A review of socio-technical energy transition (STET) models

Many existing technical feasibility and modelling studies in the energy field are criticised for their limited treatment of societal actors and socio-political dynamics, poor representation of the co-evolving nature of society and technology, and hence an inability to analyse socio-technical change. At the same time, prominent conceptual frameworks of socio-technical transitions that address these elements are often found to be difficult to operationalize in quantitative energy analyses that meet policy development requirements. However a new energy modelling paradigm has started to emerge for integrating both quantitative modelling and conceptual socio-technical transitions. This paper provides a taxonomy for this new model category: ‘socio-technical energy transition’ (STET) models. A review of existing STET models and their applications to the energy supply, buildings and transport sectors is provided. Following this review, the paper reflects on the extent to which these existing quantitative models captured the variety of factors covered in socio-technical transitions theory, highlights the challenges associated with their theoretical and behavioural validation, and proposes future development priorities for STET models.

[1]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  Context-specific energy strategies: coupling energy system visions with feasible implementation scenarios. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Bert de Vries,et al.  Model projections for household energy use in India , 2011 .

[3]  Floortje Alkemade,et al.  Initial infrastructure development strategies for the transition to sustainable mobility , 2010 .

[4]  F. Geels Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective , 2010 .

[5]  Mary S. Morgan,et al.  Model Experiments and Models in Experiments , 2002 .

[6]  Semida Silveira,et al.  OSeMOSYS: The Open Source Energy Modeling System: An introduction to its ethos, structure and development , 2011 .

[7]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for transition modelling , 2008 .

[8]  Georg Papachristos,et al.  A system dynamics model of socio-technical regime transitions , 2011 .

[9]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MERGE. A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies , 1995 .

[10]  Graham Ault,et al.  Modelling generation and infrastructure requirements for transition pathways , 2013 .

[11]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Socio-Technological Regimes and Transition Contexts , 2004 .

[12]  Gönenç Yücel,et al.  An Objective-Based Perspective on Assessment of Model-Supported Policy Processes , 2009, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[13]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[14]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  Lessons from the history of technological change for clean energy scenarios and policies , 2011 .

[15]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[16]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  Computational and mathematical approaches to societal transitions , 2008, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[17]  Marina Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Analyzing sustainability transitions as a shift between socio-metabolic regimes , 2011, Environmental innovation and societal transitions.

[18]  Hans Joachim Schellnhuber,et al.  Energy systems transformation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Modelling Socio-Technical Transition Patterns and Pathways , 2008, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[20]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Making or breaking climate targets: : The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy , 2015 .

[21]  Danny Pudjianto,et al.  Linking a storyline with multiple models: A cross-scale study of the UK power system transition , 2014 .

[22]  Sukumar Natarajan,et al.  Domestic futures--Which way to a low-carbon housing stock? , 2007 .

[23]  D. Banister,et al.  Simulating early adoption of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainability , 2013 .

[24]  Gönenç Yücel,et al.  A Simulation-based Analysis of Transition Pathways for the Dutch Electricity System , 2011 .

[25]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[26]  Fabian Kesicki,et al.  Costs and potentials of reducing CO2 emissions in the UK domestic stock from a systems perspective , 2012 .

[27]  V. Barnett Which was the “Real” Kondratiev: 1925 or 1928? , 2002, Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[28]  Y. Barlas Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models , 1989 .

[29]  N. Edwards,et al.  The dynamics of technology diffusion and the impacts of climate policy instruments in the decarbonisation of the global electricity sector , 2013, 1309.7626.

[30]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[31]  Emile J.L. Chappin,et al.  Adaptation of interconnected infrastructures to climate change: A socio-technical systems perspective , 2014 .

[32]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  GEM-E3 Model Documentation , 2013 .

[33]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges Introduction to the Special Issue of The Energy Journal , 2006 .

[34]  K. Lackner,et al.  Agent-based model for electricity consumption and storage to evaluate economic viability of tariff arbitrage for residential sector demand response , 2014 .

[35]  Georg Holtz,et al.  Modelling transitions: An appraisal of experiences and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[36]  Hana Gerbelová,et al.  Electricity decarbonisation pathways for 2050 in Portugal: A TIMES (The Integrated MARKAL-EFOM System) based approach in closed versus open systems modelling , 2014 .

[37]  Hassan Qudrat-Ullah,et al.  How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model , 2010 .

[38]  W. Dolfsma,et al.  Lock-in and break-out from technological trajectories: Modeling and policy implications , 2009 .

[39]  Neil Strachan,et al.  The structure of uncertainty in future low carbon pathways , 2013 .

[40]  Daniël A. Lachman A survey and review of approaches to study transitions , 2013 .

[41]  Evelina Trutnevyte Does cost optimisation approximate the real-world energy transition? Retrospective modelling and implications for modelling the future , 2014 .

[42]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[43]  John H. Miller,et al.  Complex adaptive systems - an introduction to computational models of social life , 2009, Princeton studies in complexity.

[44]  Peter Kroes,et al.  Modelling infrastructures as socio-technical systems , 2006, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructures.

[45]  Jeroen Struben,et al.  Identifying Challenges for Sustained Adoption of Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Infrastructure , 2006 .

[46]  A. Grubler,et al.  The Energy Technology Innovation System , 2012 .

[47]  Jean Charles Hourcade,et al.  Macroeconomic Consistency Issues in E3 Modeling: The Continued Fable of the Elephant and the Rabbit , 2006 .

[48]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[49]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[50]  G. P. Hammond,et al.  Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK , 2008, 2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA).

[51]  Roger Fouquet,et al.  The slow search for solutions: lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service , 2010 .

[52]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  A Thousand Years of Energy Use in the United Kingdom , 1998 .

[53]  Joseph Alcamo,et al.  Chapter Six The SAS Approach: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge in Environmental Scenarios , 2008 .

[54]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Dynamics of energy technologies and global change , 1999 .

[55]  J. Skea,et al.  Policies and practices for a low-carbon society , 2008 .

[56]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Spatial diffusion of biogas technology in Switzerland: a GIS-based multi-agent simulation approach. , 2009 .

[57]  Gerard P.J. Dijkema,et al.  On the Impact of CO2 Emission-Trading on Power Generation Emissions , 2009 .

[58]  F. Bass A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[59]  Dennis Anderson,et al.  Combining Energy Technology Dynamics and Macroeconometrics: The E3MG Model , 2006 .

[60]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Infrastructure investment for a transition to hydrogen automobiles , 2010 .

[61]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .

[62]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  The impact of near-term climate policy choices on technology and emission transition pathways , 2015 .

[63]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2013 , 2013 .

[64]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Characterising performance of environmental models , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[65]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  A (computational) social science perspective on societal transitions , 2008, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[66]  Ruud Kempener,et al.  A complex systems approach to planning, optimization and decision making for energy networks , 2008 .

[67]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Seven Centuries of Energy Services: The Price and Use of Light in the United Kingdom (1300-2000)1 , 2006 .

[68]  Robert J. Lempert,et al.  Carrots and sticks for new technology: Abating greenhouse gas emissions in a heterogeneous and uncertain world , 2000 .

[69]  Céline Guivarch,et al.  Exploring the potential for energy conservation in French households through hybrid modeling , 2012 .

[70]  Jim Petrie,et al.  Design and Analysis of Bioenergy Networks , 2009 .

[71]  Dominik E. Reusser,et al.  Lessons for model use in transition research : a survey and comparison with other research areas , 2015 .

[72]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[73]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  Technological Change and International Trade -Insights from REMIND-R , 2010 .

[74]  Koen Steemers,et al.  Modelling domestic energy consumption at district scale: A tool to support national and local energy policies , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[75]  F. Geels Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[76]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future , 2013 .

[77]  Peter Godfrey-Smith,et al.  The strategy of model-based science , 2007 .

[78]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Agent-based modeling of climate policy: An introduction to the ENGAGE multi-level model framework , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[79]  Gerardo Marletto,et al.  Car and the city: Socio-technical transition pathways to 2030 , 2014 .

[80]  D. Gibbs,et al.  Towards a sustainable economy? Socio-technical transitions in the green building sector , 2014 .

[81]  A. S. uiterkamp,et al.  Environmental Literacy in Science and Society , 2013 .

[82]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Social Influence, Consumer Behavior, and Low-Carbon Energy Transitions , 2012 .

[83]  Denis Fan,et al.  CASCADE: An Agent Based Framework For Modeling The Dynamics Of Smart Electricity Systems , 2013 .

[84]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A transitions model for sustainable mobility , 2009 .

[85]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[86]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[87]  Céline Guivarch,et al.  2°C or Not 2°C? , 2013 .

[88]  Jeroen Struben,et al.  Essays on transition challenges for alternative propulsion vehicles and transportation systems , 2006 .

[89]  Celine Guivarch,et al.  2C or Not 2C? , 2012 .

[90]  Audley Genus,et al.  Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions , 2008 .

[91]  Robert Sitton,et al.  New York and London , 2014 .

[92]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[93]  René Kemp,et al.  The Dutch energy transition approach , 2010 .

[94]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  An Exploratory Analysis of the Dutch Electricity System in Transition , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of PICMET '11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET).

[95]  David Infield,et al.  The evolution of electricity demand and the role for demand side participation, in buildings and transport , 2013 .

[96]  John D. Sterman,et al.  All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist† , 2002 .

[97]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[98]  Robert J Lempert,et al.  A new decision sciences for complex systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[99]  George Papachristos,et al.  Towards multi-system sociotechnical transitions: why simulate , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[100]  Patrick E. Meyer,et al.  Modeling technology diffusion of complementary goods: The case of hydrogen vehicles and refueling infrastructure , 2009, Technovation.

[101]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars—Part II: Forecasting effects of feebates based on energy-efficiency , 2009 .

[102]  Gönenç Yücel,et al.  Extent of inertia caused by the existing building stock against an energy transition in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[103]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Technological transformations and long waves , 1989 .

[104]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  Modeling transitions in the California light-duty vehicles sector to achieve deep reductions in transportation greenhouse gas emissions. , 2012 .

[105]  Antoine Mandel,et al.  A multi-agent model of several economic regions , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[106]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004) , 2007 .

[107]  J. Sterman,et al.  Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems , 2006 .

[108]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field. , 2015 .

[109]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Conceptualizing, Observing, and Influencing Social-Ecological Transitions , 2009 .

[110]  A. Wright,et al.  Targeting household energy-efficiency measures using sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[111]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Nearly perfect and poles apart: investment strategies into the UK power system until 2050 , 2013 .

[112]  I. Otto,et al.  Turn down the heat : Why a 4°c warmer world must be avoided , 2012 .

[113]  F. Geels,et al.  Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways , 2010 .

[114]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges , 2014 .

[115]  F. Geels The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[116]  Emile J.L. Chappin,et al.  Simulating Energy Transitions , 2011 .

[117]  Emile J.L. Chappin,et al.  An agent-based model of transitions in consumer lighting: Policy impacts from the E.U. phase-out of incandescents , 2013 .

[118]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process , 1940 .

[119]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Transition to sustainable development in the UK housing sector: From case study to model implementation , 2008 .

[120]  Emile J.L. Chappin,et al.  Transition and transformation: A bibliometric analysis of two scientific networks researching socio-technical change , 2014 .

[121]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Discovering plausible energy and economic futures under global change using multidimensional scenario discovery , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[122]  P. Haan,et al.  How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars—Part I: Model structure, simulation of bounded rationality, and model validation , 2009 .

[123]  C. Folke,et al.  Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience , 1998 .

[124]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales , 2012 .

[125]  Ralph Horne,et al.  Low carbon, water-efficient house retrofits: an emergent niche? , 2014 .

[126]  N. Edwards Mitigation: Plausible mitigation targets , 2011 .

[127]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Methodological review of UK and international low carbon scenarios , 2010 .

[128]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[129]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[130]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  Towards a low-carbon economy: scenarios and policies for the UK , 2011 .

[131]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  The allure of energy visions: Are some visions better than others? , 2014 .

[132]  D. Charlier,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of environmental public policy measures on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the French residential sector , 2012 .

[133]  D. Vuuren,et al.  The Emissions Gap Report 2012 , 2012 .

[134]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Pathways to Deep Decarbonization: Interim 2014 Report , 2014 .

[135]  Marko Aunedi,et al.  Smart control for minimizing distribution network reinforcement cost due to electrification , 2013 .

[136]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Model projections for household energy use in developing countries , 2012 .

[137]  Jiahai Yuan,et al.  Delivering power system transition in China , 2012 .

[138]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  The journey towards decarbonization: Exploring socio-technical transitions in the electricity sector in the province of Ontario (1885–2013) and potential low-carbon pathways , 2014 .

[139]  Salman Kahrobaee,et al.  Multiagent study of smart grid customers with neighborhood electricity trading , 2014 .

[140]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  A Critical Survey of Agent-Based Wholesale Electricity Market Models , 2008 .

[141]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[142]  Subhes C. Bhattacharyya,et al.  A review of energy system models , 2010 .

[143]  P. Allen,et al.  Modelling sustainable energy futures for the UK , 2014 .

[144]  Céline Guivarch,et al.  Comparing and Combining Energy Saving Policies: Will Proposed Residential Sector Policies Meet French Official Targets? , 2011 .

[145]  M. Strubegger,et al.  User's Guide for MESSAGE III , 1995 .

[146]  K. Araújo The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities , 2014 .

[147]  Martino Tran,et al.  Technology-behavioural modelling of energy innovation diffusion in the UK , 2012 .

[148]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Experiments with a Hybrid CGE-MARKAL Model1 , 2006 .

[149]  Gregor Betz What’s the Worst Case? The Methodology of Possibilistic Prediction , 2010 .

[150]  Kenneth Bernard Karlsson,et al.  Energy Scenarios: A Review of Methods, Uses and Suggestions for Improvement , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[151]  Sonja J. Vermeulen,et al.  Climate change, food security and small-scale producers: Analysis of findings of the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2014 .

[152]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[153]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[154]  Otto Rentz,et al.  Market penetration of fuel cell vehicles – Analysis based on agent behaviour , 2008 .

[155]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges Introduction to the Special Issue of The Energy Journal , 2006 .

[156]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Statistical Simulation to Estimate Uncertain Behavioral Parameters of Hybrid Energy-Economy Models , 2012, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[157]  S. Iniyan,et al.  A review of energy models , 2006 .

[158]  Will McDowall,et al.  Exploring possible transition pathways for hydrogen energy: A hybrid approach using socio-technical scenarios and energy system modelling , 2014 .

[159]  Robert Lowe,et al.  An exploration of the technical feasibility of achieving CO2 emission reductions in excess of 60% within the UK housing stock by the year 2050 , 2005 .

[160]  Gerard P.J. Dijkema,et al.  Agent-based modeling of energy infrastructure transitions , 2008 .

[161]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[162]  G. Pess,et al.  Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Pathways to Resilient Salmon Ecosystems Evolutionary History, Habitat Disturbance Regimes, and Anthropogenic Changes: What Do These Mean for Resilience of Pacific Salmon Populations? , 2009 .