The preliminary design optimization of multi-stage spur gear reduction units has been a subject of considerable interest, since many high-performance power transmission applications (e.g., automotive and aerospace) require high-performance gear reduction units. There are multiple objectives in the optimal design of multi-stage spur gear reduction unit, such as minimizing the volume and maximizing the surface fatigue life. It is reasonable to formulate the design of spur gear reduction unit as a multi-objective optimization problem, and find an appropriate approach to solve it. In this paper an interactive physical programming approach is developed to place physical programming into an interactive framework in a natural way. Class functions, which are used to represent the designer’s preferences on design objectives, are fixed during the interactive physical programming procedure. After a Pareto solution is generated, a preference offset is added into the class function of each objective based on whether the designer would like to improve this objective or sacrifice the objective so as to improve other objectives. The preference offsets are adjusted during the interactive physical programming procedure, and an optimal solution that satisfies the designer’s preferences is supposed to be obtained by the end of the procedure. An optimization problem of three-stage spur gear reduction unit is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
[1]
Hyeon Chang Choi,et al.
Prediction of residual stress distribution in multi-stacked thin film by curvature measurement and iterative FEA
,
2005
.
[2]
Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.
RELIABILITY AND REDUNDANCY APPORTIONMENT OPTIMIZATION USING INTERACTIVE PHYSICAL PROGRAMMING
,
2004
.
[3]
Wei Chen,et al.
Exploration of the effectiveness of physical programming in robust design
,
2000
.
[4]
Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.
Concept optimization for mechanical product using Genetic Algorithm
,
2005
.
[5]
Robert C. Juvinall,et al.
Fundamentals of machine component design
,
1983
.
[6]
Achille Messac,et al.
Physical programming - Effective optimization for computational design
,
1996
.
[7]
Amit Shukla,et al.
Tradeoff analysis in minimum volume design of multi-stage spur gear reduction units
,
2000
.
[8]
Dong-Hoon Choi,et al.
A new decomposition method for parallel processing multi-level optimization
,
2002
.
[9]
Dong-Hoon Choi,et al.
Adaptive parallel decomposition for multidisciplinary design
,
2004
.
[10]
A. Messac,et al.
Mathematical and Pragmatic Perspectives of Physical Programming
,
2001
.