Pilot-Scale Evaluation of Denitrification Drainage Bioreactors: Reactor Geometry and Performance

Denitrification drainage bioreactors are emerging as an innovative practice to address water quality concerns stemming from nitrate leaching from drained agricultural lands. Although installation of these systems has begun in farms in the midwestern United States, the understanding of their design and in-field performance remains deficient. This study utilized a set of pilot-scale drainage bioreactors to evaluate the impact of bioreactor geometry on reactor hydraulic properties and to determine nitrate removal under steady-state conditions and during a simulated storm event. Bioreactors with different cross-sectional geometries but similar depths and total volumes were evaluated. The percent reduction of the influent nitrate mass was linearly correlated to the theoretical hydraulic retention time (HRT) with 30 to 70% NO3--N removals observed within the 4 to 8 h of retention time suggested for field installations. Tracer tests revealed that in situ HRTs were at least 1.5 times larger than theoretical HRTs.

[1]  W. Robertson,et al.  In-stream bioreactor for agricultural nitrate treatment. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[2]  Matthew J. Helmers,et al.  Nitrogen Application Rate Effect on Nitrate-Nitrogen Concentration and Loss in Subsurface Drainage for a Corn-Soybean Rotation , 2008 .

[3]  S. Belkin,et al.  Biological denitrification of drinking water using newspaper , 1996 .

[4]  M. B. David,et al.  In Situ Measurements of Denitrification in Constructed Wetlands , 1999 .

[5]  M. Hirschi,et al.  Subsurface water quality from a flat tile-drained watershed in Illinois, USA , 2006 .

[6]  D. Jaynes,et al.  In situ bioreactors and deep drain-pipe installation to reduce nitrate losses in artificially drained fields. , 2008, Journal of environmental quality.

[7]  W. Robertson,et al.  WOOD-BASED FILTER FOR NITRATE REMOVAL IN SEPTIC SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[8]  J. Eheart,et al.  Estimation of flow and transport parameters for woodchip-based bioreactors: II. field-scale bioreactor , 2010 .

[9]  L. Christianson,et al.  XVII World Congress of the International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (CIGR) , 2010 .

[10]  Laura E. Christianson,et al.  Technical Note: Hydraulic Property Determination of Denitrifying Bioreactor Fill Media , 2010 .

[11]  L. Kellman.  A study of tile drain nitrate - δ15N values as a tool for assessing nitrate sources in an agricultural region , 2005, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[12]  J. Frankenberger,et al.  Nitrate leaching to subsurface drains as affected by drain spacing and changes in crop production system. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[13]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[14]  Joan García,et al.  A Quick, Low-Cost Treatment Method for Secondary Effluent Nitrate Removal through Denitrification , 2003 .

[15]  J. Eheart,et al.  Estimation of flow and transport parameters for woodchip- based bioreactors: I. laboratory-scale bioreactor , 2009 .

[16]  D. Blowes,et al.  Long‐Term Performance of In Situ Reactive Barriers for Nitrate Remediation , 2000 .

[17]  L. Schipper,et al.  Nitrate removal from groundwater and denitrification rates in a porous treatment wall amended with sawdust. , 2000 .

[18]  Jerry L. Hatfield,et al.  Water Quality in Walnut Creek Watershed: Herbicides and Nitrate in Surface Waters , 1999 .

[19]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[20]  W. Robertson,et al.  DENITRIFICATION OF AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE USING WOOD-BASED REACTORS , 2006 .

[21]  D. Blowes,et al.  Removal of agricultural nitrate from tile-drainage effluent water using in-line bioreactors , 1994 .

[22]  Gyles W. Randall,et al.  Nitrate Losses to Surface Water Through Subsurface, Tile Drainage , 2008 .

[23]  John A. Cherry,et al.  In Situ Denitrification of Septic‐System Nitrate Using Reactive Porous Media Barriers: Field Trials , 1995 .