Multi-DOF Real-time Hybrid Dynamic Test of a Steel Frame Structure

The hybrid test is one of the most advanced test methods to predict the structural dynamic behavior with the interaction between a physical substructure and a numerical modeling in the hybrid control system. The purpose of this study is to perform the multi-directional dynamic test of a steel frame structure with the real-time hybrid system and to evaluate the validation of the results. In this study, FEAPH, nonlinear finite element analysis program for hybrid only, was developed and the hybrid control system was optimized. The inefficient computational time was improved with a fixed number iteration method and parallel computational techniques used in FEAPH. Furthermore, the previously used data communication method and the interface between a substructure and an analysis program were simplified in the control system. As the results, the total processing time in real-time hybrid test was shortened up to 10 times of actual measured seismic period. In order to verify the accuracy and validation of the hybrid system, the linear and nonlinear dynamic tests with a steel framed structure were carried out so that the trend of displacement responses was almost in accord with the numerical results. However, the maximum displacement responses had somewhat differences due to the analysis errors in material nonlinearities and the occurrence of permanent displacements. Therefore, if the proper material model and numerical algorithms are developed, the real-time hybrid system could be used to evaluate the structural dynamic behavior and would be an effective testing method as a substitute for a shaking table test.

[1]  Jae-Jin Lee,et al.  Single Degree of Freedom Hybrid Dynamic Test with Steel Frame Structure , 2012 .

[2]  Sehoon Kim,et al.  Real-time Structural Dynamic Test Using Parallelized Control Algorithms and Optimized Hybrid System , 2012 .

[3]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development, potential, and limitations of real–time online (pseudo–dynamic) testing , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Performance evaluation of a real‐time pseudodynamic test system , 2006 .

[5]  Pui-Shum B. Shing,et al.  Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests: Convergence and energy dissipation , 1991 .

[6]  Motohiko Hakuno,et al.  DYNAMIC DESTRUCTIVE TEST OF A CANTILEVER BEAM, CONTROLLED BY AN ANALOG-COMPUTER , 1969 .

[7]  Ulrich Füllekrug,et al.  On real-time pseudo-dynamic sub-structure testing: algorithm, numerical and experimental results , 2005 .

[8]  Dae-Sung Jung,et al.  Verification of Hybrid Structural Test Technique by Shaking Table Test of a Linear 2-Dimensional Frame Model , 2010 .

[9]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Performance of a real‐time pseudodynamic test system considering nonlinear structural response , 2007 .

[10]  Chris Thewalt,et al.  Performance Parameters for Pseudodynamic Tests , 1994 .

[11]  Victor E. Saouma,et al.  Hybrid Simulation: Theory, Implementation and Applications , 2008 .

[12]  Σταυροσ Δερμιτζακησ,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF SUBSTRUCTURING TECHNIQUES FOR ON-LINE COMPUTER CONTROLLED SEISMIC PERFORMANCE TESTING , 1985 .

[13]  Yoshikazu TAKAHASHI,et al.  AN OBJECT-ORIENTED SOFTWARE ENVIRONMENT FOR COLLABORATIVE NETWORK SIMULATION , 2002 .

[14]  Gregory L. Fenves,et al.  Object-oriented finite element programming: frameworks for analysis, algorithms and parallel computing , 1997 .

[15]  Victor E. Saouma,et al.  A computational finite‐element program for hybrid simulation , 2012 .