Dynamic and adaptive policy models for coalition operations

It is envisioned that the success of future military operations depends on the better integration, organizationally and operationally, among allies, coalition members, inter-agency partners, and so forth. However, this leads to a challenging and complex environment where the heterogeneity and dynamism in the operating environment intertwines with the evolving situational factors that affect the decision-making life cycle of the war fighter. Therefore, the users in such environments need secure, accessible, and resilient information infrastructures where policy-based mechanisms adopt the behaviours of the systems to meet end user goals. By specifying and enforcing a policy based model and framework for operations and security which accommodates heterogeneous coalitions, high levels of agility can be enabled to allow rapid assembly and restructuring of system and information resources. However, current prevalent policy models (e.g., rule based event-condition-action model and its variants) are not sufficient to deal with the highly dynamic and plausibly non-deterministic nature of these environments. Therefore, to address the above challenges, in this paper, we present a new approach for policies which enables managed systems to take more autonomic decisions regarding their operations.

[1]  Emil C. Lupu,et al.  Ponder2: A Policy System for Autonomous Pervasive Environments , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems.

[2]  Weili Han,et al.  A survey on policy languages in network and security management , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[3]  Emil C. Lupu,et al.  The Ponder Policy Specification Language , 2001, POLICY.

[4]  A. Pohl,et al.  Policy-based self-management of industrial service systems , 2006, 2006 4th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics.

[5]  Dakshi Agrawal,et al.  Policy-based validation of SAN configuration , 2004, Proceedings. Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, 2004. POLICY 2004..

[6]  Julie A. McCann,et al.  A survey of autonomic computing—degrees, models, and applications , 2008, CSUR.

[7]  Emil C. Lupu,et al.  Self-Managed Cell: A Middleware for Managing Body-Sensor Networks , 2007, 2007 Fourth Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services (MobiQuitous).

[8]  Elisa Bertino,et al.  X-GTRBAC: an XML-based policy specification framework and architecture for enterprise-wide access control , 2005, TSEC.

[9]  Dinesh Verma,et al.  An autonomic approach for managing security and identity management policies in enterprises , 2006, J. High Speed Networks.

[10]  Andreas Matheus,et al.  How to Declare Access Control Policies for XML Structured Information Objects using OASIS' eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Jorge Lobo,et al.  Policy-based management of networked computing systems , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Thierry Turletti,et al.  A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[13]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  A policy language for a pervasive computing environment , 2003, Proceedings POLICY 2003. IEEE 4th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks.

[14]  M. J. Maullo,et al.  Policy management: an architecture and approach , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 1st International Workshop on Systems Management.

[15]  Tien Pham,et al.  Policy enabled interconnection of sensor networks using a message queue infrastructure , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[16]  Dinesh C. Verma,et al.  Simplifying network administration using policy-based management , 2002, IEEE Netw..

[17]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  KAoS policy and domain services: toward a description-logic approach to policy representation, deconfliction, and enforcement , 2003, Proceedings POLICY 2003. IEEE 4th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks.

[18]  Wamberto Weber Vasconcelos,et al.  OWL-POLAR: Semantic Policies for Agent Reasoning , 2010, SEMWEB.

[19]  Andrea Westerinen,et al.  Policy Core Information Model - Version 1 Specification , 2001, RFC.