Different Levels Of Knowledge Transfer In Building A Globally Competitive Technology Transfer Network

The University Technology Enterprise Network (UTEN), which was launched in March 2007, includes 15 Portuguese Universities and select international partners in a 5-Year program funded by the Portuguese government. Participants in this program included, The Innovation, Creativity, Capital (IC²) Institute at The University of Texas at Austin, The Portuguese National Science Foundation (FCT), Portuguese Technology Transfer Officers (TTOs), and select international partners. The main objective is to accelerate the development of a sustainable, globally competitive, professional technology transfer and commercialization network within Portugal to increase Portugal’s international competitiveness in university–based science and technology transfer and commercialization. To study and explicate key knowledge transfer issues of this project, we use the Knowledge Spiral Model (Nonaka and Takeouchi, 1995) which is based on the distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge theory developed by Poloanyi (1966). Within the Knowledge Spiral Model there are four types of knowledge transformation: 1) Socialization: From tacit to tacit. 2) Externalization: From tacit to explicit. 3) Combination: From explicit to explicit. 4) Internalization: From explicit to tacit. In the UTEN Program, there are specific set of activities and programs related to each of the Knowledge Spiral’s Model four groups of knowledge transformation. These UTEN activities include: International Workshops, Training Weeks, On-the-Job-Training, International Internships, and In-Situ (In-Situation) Training.

[1]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[2]  Hiroyuki Itami.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[3]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[4]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  Deep Smarts: How to Cultivate and Transfer Enduring Business Wisdom , 2005 .

[5]  R. Reich.  The Work of Nations , 2006 .

[6]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[7]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[8]  Verna Allee,et al.  The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence , 1997 .

[9]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[10]  P. Drucker.  Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[11]  Karl-Erik Sveiby.  The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[12]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Knowledge as a New Form of Capital , 1989 .

[13]  Otto Wassermann,et al.  The Intelligent Enterprise , 2001 .

[14]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[15]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[16]  Debra M. Amidon,et al.  Innovation Strategy for the Knowledge Economy , 1997 .

[17]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Developing a Knowledge Strategy , 1999 .

[18]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[19]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .