Optimization of reproductive effort and foraging time in mammals: The influence of resource level and predation risk

SummaryThe trade-off between fitness benefits from foraging and associated costs in terms of predation risk is analysed by a simple model which takes into account the differential predation risk for reproducing and non-reproducing individuals. The currency that animals are assumed to maximize is their expected absolute fitness (probability of survival plus half of the expected litter size) after a potential reproductive period. Depending on resource levels and predation risk, this maximization can be achieved by (1) opting for individual survival and behaving as a strict time minimizer, (2) by reproducing at the maximal rate and behaving as a strict energy maximizer or (3) by submaximal reproductive effort and a behaviour intermediate between time minimization and energy maximization. Small changes in the availability of food or cover or in the density of predators can shift the optimum from one strategy to another. The shift is particularly abrupt, if predation pressure increases and the availability of resources remains high. This could explain the spatial and temporal variation in the reproductive effort and body weight observed in boreal small mammals with sustained, multiannual population fluctuations.

[1]  H. Henttonen,et al.  Gradients in density variations of small rodents: the importance of latitude and snow cover , 1985, Oecologia.

[2]  O. Mustonen,et al.  Influence of predation risk on early development and maturation in three species of Clethrionomys voles , 1993 .

[3]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Specialist predators, generalist predators, and the microtine rodent cycle. , 1991 .

[4]  B. Hörnfeldt,et al.  Delayed Density Dependence as a Determinant of Vole Cycles , 1994 .

[5]  H. Ylönen,et al.  Behaviour of cyclic bank voles under risk of mustelid predation: do females avoid copulations? , 1994, Oecologia.

[6]  A. Houston,et al.  The Common Currency for Behavioral Decisions , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Foraging Strategies and the Avoidance of Predation by an Aquatic Insect, Notonecta Hoffmanni , 1982 .

[8]  J. S. Brown,et al.  Patch use under predation risks. I : Models and predictions , 1992 .

[9]  S. L. Lima.  Maximizing feeding efficiency and minimizing time exposed to predators: a trade-off in the black-capped chickadee , 1985, Oecologia.

[10]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Risk-sensitive foraging: A review of the theory , 1992 .

[11]  A. Järvinen.  Predation causing extended low densities in microtine cycles: implications from predation on hole-nesting passerines , 1985 .

[12]  B. Fitzgerald.  Weasel Predation on a Cyclic Population of the Montane Vole (Microtus montanus) in California , 1977 .

[13]  L. Dill,et al.  A DETERMINATION OF THE ENERGETIC EQUIVALENCE OF THE RISK OF PREDATION , 1989 .

[14]  B. Jędrzejewska,et al.  Seasonal surplus killing as hunting strategy of the weasel Mustela nivalis - test of a hypothesis , 1989 .

[15]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use predation risk. II : A test with fox squirrels, Sciurus niger , 1992 .

[16]  M. Gilpin.  Group selection in predator-prey communities. , 1975, Monographs in population biology.

[17]  E. Korpimäki,et al.  Responses of stoats and least weasels to fluctuating food abundances: is the low phase of the vole cycle due to mustelid predation? , 1991, Oecologia.

[18]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Foraging-efficiency-predation-risk trade-off in the grey squirrel , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  C. Krebs,et al.  Population Cycles in Small Mammals , 1974 .

[20]  O. Liberg,et al.  Predation as a Regulating Factor on Small Rodent Populations in Southern Sweden , 1983 .

[21]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Complex Dynamics in Ecological Time Series , 1992 .

[22]  Lauri Oksanen,et al.  Exploitation ecosystems in seasonal environments , 1990 .

[23]  Erkki Korpimäki,et al.  Population oscillations of boreal rodents: regulation by mustelid predators leads to chaos , 1993, Nature.

[24]  L. Hansson,et al.  An Interpretation of Rodent Dynamics as Due to Trophic Interactions , 1987 .

[25]  Tarja Oksanen,et al.  How much do weasels shape microtine cycles in the northern Fennoscandian taiga , 1987 .

[26]  Heikki Henttonen,et al.  Predation causing extended low densities in microtine cycles: further evidence from shrew dynamics , 1985 .

[27]  S. Erlinge.  Predation and noncyclicity in a microtine population in southern Sweden , 1987 .

[28]  P. Abrams.  Life History and the Relationship Between Food Availability and Foraging Effort , 1991 .

[29]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  A. Sih.  Optimal Behavior and Density-Dependent Predation , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[31]  P. Abrams.  Functional Responses of Optimal Foragers , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[32]  S. Fretwell,et al.  The Regulation of Plant Communities by the Food Chains Exploiting Them , 2015 .

[33]  H. Ylönen,et al.  Breeding suppression in the bank vole as antipredatory adaptation in a predictable environment , 1994, Evolutionary Ecology.

[34]  Jeffrey R. Lucas,et al.  The Role of Foraging Time Constraints and Variable Prey Encounter in Optimal Diet Choice , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[35]  L. Beukeboom.  Phenotypic fitness effects of the selfish B chromosome, paternal sex ratio (PSR) in the parasitic waspNasonia vitripennis , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[36]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Long-term microtine dynamics in north Fennoscandian tundra: the vole cycle and the lemming chaos , 1992 .

[37]  F. A. Pitelka,et al.  The Herbivore-Based Trophic System , 2004 .

[38]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Foraging Time Optimization and Interactions in Food Webs , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[39]  L. Hansson.  Predation as the factor causing extended low densities in microtine cycles , 1984 .

[40]  C. Clark,et al.  Towards a Unifield Foraging Theory , 1986 .

[41]  Jan Ekman,et al.  Exposure and time use in willow tit flocks: the cost of subordination , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  J. Valkama,et al.  Reproductive investment under fluctuating predation risk: Microtine rodents and small mustelids , 1994, Evolutionary Ecology.

[43]  Lennart Hansson.  Tracking or Delay Effects in Microtine Reproduction , 1989 .

[44]  T. S. Jensen.  Seed production and outbreaks of non-cyclic rodent populations in deciduous forests , 1982, Oecologia.

[45]  C. Magnhagen.  Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  L. Hansson.  Composition of cyclic and non-cyclic vole populations: On the causes of variation in individual quality among Clethrionomys glareolus in Sweden , 1984, Oecologia.

[47]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Surplus Killing in the Hunting Strategy of Small Predators , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[48]  A. Houston,et al.  Starvation and Predation as Factors Limiting Population Size , 1987 .

[49]  H. Ylönen.  Weasels Mustela Nivalis Suppress Reproduction in Cyclic Bank Voles Clethrionomys Glareolus , 1989 .

[50]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Reproductive Effort and Optimal Reproductive Rates in Small Rodents , 1980 .

[51]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Habitat use of small mustelids in north Fennoscandian tundra: a test of the hypothesis of patchy exploitation ecosystems , 1992 .

[52]  B. Cushing.  Estrous Mice and Vulnerability to Weasel Predation , 1985 .

[53]  B. Hörnfeldt,et al.  Effects of cyclic food supply on breeding performance in Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) , 1990 .

[54]  Heikki Henttonen,et al.  The Role of Plant Production in Microtine Cycles in Northern Fennoscandia , 1983 .

[55]  L. Hansson.  Parent-offspring correlations for growth and reproduction in the vole Clethrionomus glareolus in relation to the Chitty Hypothesis , 1988 .

[56]  T Seldal,et al.  Grazing-induced proteinase inhibitors: a possible cause for lemming population cycles , 1994 .

[57]  P. Lundberg,et al.  Diet choice and predator—prey dynamics , 1994, Evolutionary Ecology.