The Benefit of a Single-Leg Strength Training Program for the Muscles around the Untrained Ankle: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Severe ankle injuries can require extended periods of immobilization that adversely affect the strength of the ankle muscles. We have investigated a single-leg strength training program of the muscles surrounding the ankle to determine if it produces a crossover benefit for the contralateral ankle muscles. Twenty subjects without any history of ankle injuries were randomly divided into a control and a training group. Both groups underwent isokinetic testing of the ankle muscles at the beginning and end of an 8-week period. The control group maintained normal activities between the tests. Half of the training group trained the dominant leg only and the other half trained the nondominant leg only for the 8-week period, three times per week. The subjects who trained the dominant leg improved peak torque values by 8.5% in the trained leg and 1.5% in the untrained leg. Similarly, the subjects who trained the nondominant leg improved peak torque values by 9.3% in the trained leg and 3.5% in the untrained leg. In contrast, the control group showed no significant change in peak torque, power, or endurance between the initial and final tests. With improvements in peak torque as high as 40% in the trained leg and a crossover benefit of 19% in the untrained leg in eccentric inversion, this strength training technique deserves further investigation in an injured population where the benefits may be more substantial.

[1]  R. P. Mack Ankle injuries in athletics. , 1982, Clinics in sports medicine.

[2]  F. A. Hellebrandt,et al.  The influence of unilateral exercise on the contralateral limb. , 1947, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  R. Salter,et al.  The Effects of Continuous Compression on Living Articular Cartilage: An Experimental Investigation , 1960 .

[4]  R. C. Lehman,et al.  Electrical stimulation versus voluntary exercise in strengthening thigh musculature after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[5]  J. Steadman,et al.  Rehabilitation of the knee. , 1989, Clinics in sports medicine.

[6]  S L Woo,et al.  Effects of Immobilization on Joints , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  J. Garrick,et al.  The epidemiology of foot and ankle injuries in sports. , 1989, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery.

[8]  W. Enneking,et al.  The intra-articular effects of immobilization on the human knee. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  C. Anderson,et al.  DEGENERATION OF IMMOBILIZED KNEE JOINTS IN RATS; HISTOLOGICAL AND AUTORADIOGRAPHIC STUDY. , 1965, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  T. Häggmark,et al.  Cylinder or mobile cast brace after knee ligament surgery , 1979, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  M IKAI,et al.  Some factors modifying the expression of human strength. , 1961, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  T. Ashikaga,et al.  Transcutaneous muscle stimulation to retard disuse atrophy after open meniscectomy. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  P. Renström,et al.  Treatment for acute tears of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. Operation, cast, or early controlled mobilization. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  B. Beynnon,et al.  on the strength, power and endurance of the contralateral leg A randomized, controlled study using isometric and concentric isokinetic training , 1992 .

[15]  M. Järvinen,et al.  Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Knee Ligament Injuries , 1990, Sports Medicine.

[16]  L G Shaver,et al.  Effects of training on relative muscular endurance in ipsilateral and contralateral arms. , 1970, Medicine and science in sports.