Stress analyses of joint arthroplasty in the proximal humerus

Finite element stress analyses were performed on the proximal humerus before and after the simulated implantation of stemmed, metallic prosthetic components with porous sintered surfaces for direct bony attachment. Design geometries with surfaces at the prosthetic head/bone interface that were (a) convex, (b) flat, and (c) concave were studies. Analyses for each of the three geometries were conducted to reflect (a) bone ingrowth on all the prosthesis/bone surfaces and (b) bone ingrowth only along the underside of the prosthetic humeral head (assuming the stem was not coated with a porous material). Three loading conditions were used to model various degrees of abduction of the arm. Results indicated that in the normal humerus the compressive joint forces are transmitted from the articular surface through cancellous bone to the inferior cortical shell. Concentration of the rotator cuff muscles created tensile stresses in the superolateral cancellous bone and the superior cortical shell of the humerus. Results of the implanted numeral component models indicated that the use of a prosthesis with bone ingrowth along the stem would cause marked stress shielding proximally whereas the use of implants with porous ingrowth only on the underside of the humeral head replacement produced stress fields more similar to the normal humerus. The convex, flat, and concave surfaces provided similar load transfer from the component to the underlying bone in all loading cases. Other prosthetic head designs that may offer better initial stability produced stress fields similar to those of existing prostheses.

[1]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  E Y Chao,et al.  A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  D R Carter,et al.  Stress distributions in the acetabular region--II. Effects of cement thickness and metal backing of the total hip acetabular component. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  I. Clarke,et al.  Porous ingrowth fixation of the femoral component in a canine surface replacement of the hip. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Poppen Nk,et al.  Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. , 1978 .

[6]  D. Hungerford,et al.  Preliminary experience with a total knee prosthesis with porous coating used without cement. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  R. Cofield Status of total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1977, Archives of surgery.

[8]  C. Neer,et al.  Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  C. J. De Duca,et al.  Force analysis of individual muscles acting simultaneously on the shoulder joint during isometric abduction. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  D R Carter,et al.  Stress distributions in the acetabular region--I. Before and after total joint replacement. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  A. Depalma,et al.  "Floating-socket" total shoulder replacement: anatomical, biomechanical, and surgical rationale. , 1978, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  D R Carter,et al.  Stress changes in the femoral head due to porous ingrowth surface replacement arthroplasty. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.