Measuring the Contribution of Workers' Health and Psychosocial Work‐Environment on Production Efficiency

Increasingly many firms have started to implement programs intended to improve the workers' health and the psychosocial work-environment, as well as other attributes of labor quality. Motivated by the need for evaluating to what extent the programs affect a firm's productivity performance, this study discusses a model for analyzing the contribution of labor quality attributes toward firm productivity. To assess the contribution from the labor quality attributes, we model firm productivity as the outcome of two separate processes within a firm: the physical production process and the labor quality process. Firm productivity is measured by a Malmquist-like productivity index and is computed by Data Envelopment Analysis. Based on bootstrap methods we analyze potential statistical bias and provide bias-corrected productivity estimates. The labor quality attributes are first modeled at an individual worker level as latent variables using Item Response Theory, and then aggregated to a firm-level. The model is empirically validated using data from three manufacturing plants that participated in a coordinated worksite health promotion program. Over a 4-year period (2000�2003), we observed a general improvement in efficiency of 2�5%, half of which could be attributed to an improvement in workers' health and psychosocial work-environment. A key benefit with the model is that it is practical, easy to implement, and very fast to compute. The model also constructively contributes to the discourse on sustainability by providing a framework for deriving meaningful metrics and providing tangible measurements on the effect of sustainability-related issues.

[1]  R. Färe,et al.  Measuring Plant Capacity, Utilization and Technical Change: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[2]  L. Pizzi,et al.  Health-Related Workplace Productivity Measurement: General and Migraine-Specific Recommendations from the ACOEM Expert Panel , 2003, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[3]  D. Luenberger Benefit functions and duality , 1992 .

[4]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  FEAR: A software package for frontier efficiency analysis with R , 2008 .

[5]  M. L. Karlsson,et al.  The Effects of Psychosocial Work Factors on Production Loss, and the Mediating Effect of Employee Health , 2010, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[6]  M. Thomas The Value of Item Response Theory in Clinical Assessment: A Review , 2011, Assessment.

[7]  Sandra Sülz,et al.  Modeling and notation of DEA with strong and weak disposable outputs , 2011, Health care management science.

[8]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  A Simon Pickard,et al.  Psychometric Comparison of the Standard EQ-5D to a 5 Level Version in Cancer Patients , 2007, Medical care.

[11]  Kevin D. Frick,et al.  A Review of Health-Related Workplace Productivity Loss Instruments , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[12]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[13]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[15]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[16]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[17]  C. Björklund,et al.  A comprehensive workplace intervention and its outcome with regard to lifestyle, health and sick leave: the AHA study. , 2008, Work.

[18]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Some Problems with the Ferrier/Hirschberg Bootstrap Idea , 1997 .

[19]  Fredrik Ødegaard,et al.  Measuring Worksite Health Promotion Programs: an application of Structural Equation Modeling with ordinal data , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[20]  Mark A. Huselid The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[21]  Dimitris Rizopoulos,et al.  ltm: An R Package for Latent Variable Modeling and Item Response Analysis , 2006 .

[22]  Robert A. Stine,et al.  An Introduction to Bootstrap Methods , 1989 .

[23]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Performance of the Bootstrap for DEA Estimators and Iterating the Principle , 2011 .

[24]  Steven P Reise,et al.  Item response theory and clinical measurement. , 2009, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[25]  M. Lundström,et al.  An Index Approach For The Measurement Of Patient Benefits From Surgery — Illustrated In The Case Of Cataract Extraction , 1998 .

[26]  Magnus Tambour,et al.  Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA network model , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[28]  Dennis E. Blumenfeld,et al.  Impact of Absenteeism on Assembly Line Quality and Throughput , 2009 .

[29]  W. Taylor,et al.  Using Rasch analysis to compare the psychometric properties of the Short Form 36 physical function score and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[30]  S. Malmquist Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[31]  Matthew S. Johnson,et al.  Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Item Response Models in R , 2007 .

[32]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Leâ Opold Simar,et al.  A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models , 2000 .

[34]  S. Afriat Efficiency Estimation of Production Function , 1972 .

[35]  Rohit Verma,et al.  MULTIPLE RATERS IN SURVEY‐BASED OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND TUTORIAL , 2000 .

[36]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[37]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity and quality changes in Swedish pharmacies , 1995 .