Spectral Libraries for SWATH‐MS Assays for Drosophila melanogaster and Solanum lycopersicum

Quantitative proteomics methods have emerged as powerful tools for measuring protein expression changes at the proteome level. Using MS‐based approaches, it is now possible to routinely quantify thousands of proteins. However, prefractionation of the samples at the protein or peptide level is usually necessary to go deep into the proteome, increasing both MS analysis time and technical variability. Recently, a new MS acquisition method named SWATH is introduced with the potential to provide good coverage of the proteome as well as a good measurement precision without prior sample fractionation. In contrast to shotgun‐based MS however, a library containing experimental acquired spectra is necessary for the bioinformatics analysis of SWATH data. In this study, spectral libraries for two widely used models are built to study crop ripening or animal embryogenesis, Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) and Drosophila melanogaster, respectively. The spectral libraries comprise fragments for 5197 and 6040 proteins for S. lycopersicum and D. melanogaster, respectively, and allow reproducible quantification for thousands of peptides per MS analysis. The spectral libraries and all MS data are available in the MassIVE repository with the dataset identifiers MSV000081074 and MSV000081075 and the PRIDE repository with the dataset identifiers PXD006493 and PXD006495.

[1]  Lars Malmström,et al.  Large-scale inference of protein tissue origin in gram-positive sepsis plasma using quantitative targeted proteomics , 2016, Nature Communications.

[2]  L. Gatto,et al.  A draft map of the mouse pluripotent stem cell spatial proteome , 2016, Nature Communications.

[3]  B. Monsarrat,et al.  Deciphering preferential interactions within supramolecular protein complexes: the proteasome case , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[4]  Gennifer E. Merrihew,et al.  Deconvolution of mixture spectra from ion-trap data-independent-acquisition tandem mass spectrometry. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  C. Robinson,et al.  Mass spectrometry guided structural biology. , 2016, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  Andrew R. Jones,et al.  ProteomeXchange provides globally co-ordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Stephen E. Stein,et al.  The Drosophila melanogaster PeptideAtlas facilitates the use of peptide data for improved fly proteomics and genome annotation , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function , 2016, Nature.

[9]  Eric W. Deutsch,et al.  A repository of assays to quantify 10,000 human proteins by SWATH-MS , 2014, Scientific Data.

[10]  Chris Sander,et al.  Human SRMAtlas: A Resource of Targeted Assays to Quantify the Complete Human Proteome , 2016, Cell.

[11]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Proteome-wide association studies identify biochemical modules associated with a wing-size phenotype in Drosophila melanogaster , 2016, Nature Communications.

[12]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Targeted Data Extraction of the MS/MS Spectra Generated by Data-independent Acquisition: A New Concept for Consistent and Accurate Proteome Analysis* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[13]  Oliver M. Bernhardt,et al.  Extending the Limits of Quantitative Proteome Profiling with Data-Independent Acquisition and Application to Acetaminophen-Treated Three-Dimensional Liver Microtissues* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[14]  Dana Pascovici,et al.  SWATH Mass Spectrometry Performance Using Extended Peptide MS/MS Assay Libraries* , 2016, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[15]  Oliver M. Bernhardt,et al.  Reproducible and Consistent Quantification of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteome by SWATH-mass spectrometry* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[16]  Kathryn S Lilley,et al.  In‐depth characterization of the tomato fruit pericarp proteome , 2017, Proteomics.

[17]  Bruno Manadas,et al.  SWATH‐MS as a tool for biomarker discovery: From basic research to clinical applications , 2017, Proteomics.

[18]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Olga T. Schubert,et al.  Systems-level Proteomics of Two Ubiquitous Leaf Commensals Reveals Complementary Adaptive Traits for Phyllosphere Colonization* , 2016, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[20]  Patrick G. A. Pedrioli,et al.  A high-quality catalog of the Drosophila melanogaster proteome , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  M. Sharon,et al.  Mass spectrometry: a technique of many faces , 2016, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[22]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Absolute Proteome Composition and Dynamics during Dormancy and Resuscitation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2015, Cell host & microbe.

[23]  J. Coon,et al.  Value of using multiple proteases for large-scale mass spectrometry-based proteomics. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[24]  Chih-Chiang Tsou,et al.  DIA-Umpire: comprehensive computational framework for data-independent acquisition proteomics , 2015, Nature Methods.

[25]  S. Russell,et al.  Analysis of Drosophila melanogaster proteome dynamics during embryonic development by a combination of label‐free proteomics approaches , 2016, Proteomics.