Signpost: Scalable MU-MIMO Signaling with Zero CSI Feedback

Poor scalability is a long standing problem in multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO) networks: in order to select concurrent uplink users with strong channel orthogonality and thus high total capacity, channel state information (CSI) feedback from users is required. However, when the user population is large, the overhead from CSI feedback can easily overwhelm the actual channel time spent on data transmission. Moreover, due to spontaneous uplink traffic, uplink user selection cannot rely on the access point's central assignment and needs a distributed realization instead, which makes the problem even more challenging. In this paper, we propose a fully scalable and distributed uplink MU-MIMO protocol called Signpost. Firstly, Signpost is scalable, i.e., it achieves zero CSI overhead by exploiting a novel orthogonality evaluation mechanism that enables each user to speculate its orthogonality to other users, using its own CSI only. Secondly, Signpost realizes distributed user selection through a two-dimensional prioritized contention mechanism, which can single out the best users efficiently by utilizing both the time and frequency domain resources. The contention mechanism includes a unique collision recovery scheme, which enables Signpost to achieve a collision probability as low as one-tenth compared with traditional 802.11-like mechanism. Software-radio based implementation and testbed experimentation show that Signpost significantly outperforms state-of-the-art user selection methods under various traffic patterns and node mobility.

[1]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Argos: practical many-antenna base stations , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[2]  Huadong Ma,et al.  On Coverage Problems of Directional Sensor Networks , 2005, MSN.

[3]  Yi Liu,et al.  A low complexity user scheduling algorithm for uplink multiuser MIMO systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Voon Chin Phua,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1999 .

[5]  Kang G. Shin,et al.  NEMOx: scalable network MIMO for wireless networks , 2013, MobiCom.

[6]  Tianxiong Ji,et al.  Low Complex User Selection Strategies for Multi-User MIMO Downlink Scenario , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[7]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Fixed point analysis of single cell IEEE 802.11e WLANs: uniqueness, multistability and throughput differentiation , 2005, SIGMETRICS '05.

[8]  Eytan Modiano,et al.  Efficient Scheduling of Multi-User Multi-Antenna Systems , 2006, 2006 4th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks.

[9]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Shifting the MIMO Paradigm , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  Mohsen Guizani,et al.  Double proportional fair user pairing algorithm for uplink virtual MIMO systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Srihari Nelakuditi,et al.  No time to countdown: migrating backoff to the frequency domain , 2011, MobiCom.

[12]  Sachin Katti,et al.  Strider: automatic rate adaptation and collision handling , 2011, SIGCOMM.

[13]  Andrzej Duda,et al.  Idle sense: an optimal access method for high throughput and fairness in rate diverse wireless LANs , 2005, SIGCOMM '05.

[14]  David Wetherall,et al.  Predictable 802.11 packet delivery from wireless channel measurements , 2010, SIGCOMM '10.

[15]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Distortion-Aware Concurrent Multipath Transfer for Mobile Video Streaming in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[16]  Ming-Syan Chen,et al.  Rate Adaptation for 802.11 Multiuser MIMO Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[17]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Low Complexity User Selection Algorithms for Multiuser MIMO Systems with Block Diagonalization , 2006, Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005..

[18]  Candice King,et al.  Fundamentals of wireless communications , 2013, 2014 67th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers.

[19]  Kate Ching-Ju Lin,et al.  Random access heterogeneous MIMO networks , 2011, SIGCOMM.

[20]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Multi-Antenna Downlink Channels with Limited Feedback and User Selection , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  P. Samundiswary,et al.  Performance Analysis of IEEE 802 , 2013 .

[22]  Xinyu Zhang,et al.  Adaptive feedback compression for MIMO networks , 2013, MobiCom.

[23]  Kate Ching-Ju Lin,et al.  Leader-Contention-Based User Matching for 802.11 Multiuser MIMO Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[24]  Dina Katabi,et al.  Interference alignment and cancellation , 2009, SIGCOMM '09.

[25]  Candice King,et al.  Fundamentals of wireless communications , 2013, 2013 IEEE Rural Electric Power Conference (REPC).

[26]  Edward W. Knightly,et al.  Design and experimental evaluation of multi-user beamforming in wireless LANs , 2010, MobiCom.

[27]  Devavrat Shah,et al.  Spinal codes , 2012, CCRV.

[28]  Ashutosh Sabharwal,et al.  Beamforming on mobile devices: a first study , 2011, MobiCom '11.

[29]  A. Girotra,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802 . 11 Distributed Coordination Function , 2005 .

[30]  Wei Wang,et al.  SAM: enabling practical spatial multiple access in wireless LAN , 2009, MobiCom '09.

[31]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  On the capacity of MIMO broadcast channels with partial side information , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[32]  Xinyu Zhang,et al.  Scalable user selection for MU-MIMO networks , 2014, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.