Understanding student input for tutorial dialogue in procedural domains

We present an analysis of student language input in a corpus of tutoring dialogue in the domain of symbolic differentiation. Our focus on procedural tutoring makes the dialogue comparable to collaborative problem-solving (CPS). Existing CPS models describe the process of negotiating plans and goals, which also fits procedural tutoring. However, we provide a classification of student utterances and corpus annotation which shows that approximately 28% of non-trivial student language in this corpus is not accounted for by existing models, and addresses other functions, such as evaluating past actions or correcting mistakes. Our analysis can be used as a foundation for improving models of tutoring dialogue.

[1]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Nate Blaylock.  A Collaborative Problem-Solving Model of Dialogue , 2005, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[3]  Joel A. Michael,et al.  Classifying Student Initiatives and Tutor Responses in Human Keyboard-to-Keyboard Tutoring Sessions , 2002 .

[4]  Reva Freedman,et al.  What Should the Tutor Do When the Student Cannot Answer a Question? , 1999, FLAIRS Conference.

[5]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.

[6]  Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová,et al.  Analysis of Mixed Natural and Symbolic Input in Mathematical Dialogs , 2004, ACL.

[7]  B. Bloom.  The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[8]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Karen E. Lochbaum,et al.  A Collaborative Planning Model of Intentional Structure , 1998, CL.

[10]  Claus Zinn,et al.  The Role of Initiative in Tutorial Dialogue , 2003, EACL.

[11]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skills , 1978, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Claus Zinn,et al.  Using dialogue to learn math in the LeActiveMath project , 2006 .

[13]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Building a Bridge between Intelligent Tutoring and Collaborative Dialogue Systems , 2001 .

[14]  James Ong,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Procedural Task Training of Remote Payload Operations at NASA , 2000 .

[15]  Claus Zinn.  Supporting Tutorial Feedback to Student Help Requests and Errors in Symbolic Differentiation , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[16]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  An Artificial Discourse Language for Collaborative Negotiation , 1994, AAAI.

[18]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[19]  Brady Clark,et al.  Advantages of Spoken Language Interaction in Dialogue-Based Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[20]  C. Stasz,et al.  Tutoring Techniques in Algebra , 1990 .

[21]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor: A simulation of a human tutor , 1999, Cognitive Systems Research.