Three-Dimensional CSEM Modelling on Unstructured Tetrahedral Meshes Using Edge Finite Elements

The last decade has been a period of rapid growth for electromagnetic methods (EM) in geophysics, mostly because of their industrial adoption. In particular, the marine controlled-source electromagnetic method (CSEM) has become an important technique for reducing ambiguities in data interpretation in hydrocarbon exploration. In order to be able to predict the EM signature of a given geological structure, modelling tools provide us with synthetic results which we can then compare to real data. On the other hand and among the modelling methods for EM based upon 3D unstructured meshes, the Nedelec Edge Finite Element Method (EFEM) offers a good trade-off between accuracy and number of degrees of freedom, i.e. size of the problem. Furthermore, its divergence-free basis is very well suited for solving Maxwell’s equation. On top of that, we present the numerical formulation and results of 3D CSEM modelling using the Parallel Edge-based Tool for Geophysical Electromagnetic Modelling (PETGEM) on unstructured tetrahedral meshes. We validated our experiments against quasi-analytical results in canonical models.

[1]  Changsoo Shin,et al.  Three‐dimensional modelling of controlled‐source electromagnetic surveys using an edge finite‐element method with a direct solver , 2014 .

[2]  Hongzhu Cai,et al.  3D controlled-source electromagnetic modeling in anisotropic medium using edge-based finite element method , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[3]  Kerry Key,et al.  Marine Electromagnetic Studies of Seafloor Resources and Tectonics , 2011, Surveys in Geophysics.

[4]  Leonard J. Srnka,et al.  Special Section — Marine Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Methods An introduction to marine controlled-source electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration , 2007 .

[5]  Jian-Ming Jin,et al.  The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics , 1993 .

[6]  Vladimir Puzyrev,et al.  Edge-based electric field formulation in 3D CSEM simulations: A parallel approach , 2015, 2015 International Conference and Workshop on Computing and Communication (IEMCON).

[7]  S. Constable.  Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration , 2010 .

[8]  Lucy MacGregor,et al.  Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas , 2002 .

[9]  Chester J. Weiss,et al.  Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods: Insights from 1D modeling , 2006 .

[10]  Jelena Koldan.  Numerical solution of 3-D electromagnetic problems in exploration geophysics and its implementation on massively parallel computers , 2013 .

[11]  Kerry Key,et al.  The feasibility of reservoir monitoring using time-lapse marine CSEM , 2009 .

[12]  Kerry Key,et al.  1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers , 2009 .

[13]  Karsiti,et al.  1 D Modeling of Controlled-Source Electromagnetic ( CSEM ) Data using Finite Element Method for Hydrocarbon Detection in Shallow Water , 2011 .

[14]  Guillaume Houzeaux,et al.  A parallel finite-element method for three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic forward modelling , 2013 .

[15]  José María Cela,et al.  A Parallel Tool for Numerical Approximation of 3D Electromagnetic Surveys in Geophysics , 2016, Computación y Sistemas.

[16]  Carretera de Valencia,et al.  The finite element method in electromagnetics , 2000 .

[17]  J. Shadid,et al.  Three‐dimensional wideband electromagnetic modeling on massively parallel computers , 1996 .

[18]  Steven Constable,et al.  Marine electromagnetic methods—A new tool for offshore exploration , 2006 .

[19]  Mikhail Boulaenko,et al.  Marine CSEM Technology—The Luva Case , 2007 .

[20]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Three-dimensional induction logging problems, Part 2: A finite-difference solution , 2002 .