Use of multiple wearable inertial sensors in upper limb motion tracking.

This paper presents a new human motion tracking system using two wearable inertial sensors that are placed near the wrist and elbow joints of the upper limb. Each inertial sensor consists of a tri-axial accelerometer, a tri-axial gyroscope and a tri-axial magnetometer. The turning rates of the gyroscope were utilised for localising the wrist and elbow joints on the assumption that the two upper limb segment lengths are known a priori. To determine the translation and rotation of the shoulder joint, an equality-constrained optimisation technique is adopted to find an optimal solution, incorporating measurements from the tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope. Experimental results demonstrate that this new system, compared to an optical motion tracker, has RMS position errors that are normally less than 0.01 m, and RMS angle errors that are 2.5-4.8 degrees .

[1]  John J. Craig Zhu,et al.  Introduction to robotics mechanics and control , 1991 .

[2]  Michael Zyda,et al.  Inertial and magnetic posture tracking for inserting humans into networked virtual environments , 2001, VRST '01.

[3]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Applications of wearable inertial sensors in estimation of upper limb movements , 2006, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[4]  Hendrik Johannes Luinge,et al.  Inertial sensing of human movement , 2002 .

[5]  Christopher Eccleston,et al.  Does technology have a role to play in assisting stroke therapy?: A review of practical issues for practitioners , 2006 .

[6]  Peter H Veltink,et al.  Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[8]  Cuthbert Daniel,et al.  Fitting Equations to Data: Computer Analysis of Multifactor Data , 1980 .

[9]  M A Koopmanschap,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of integrated stroke services. , 2005, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[10]  D. Wade,et al.  Recent advances in rehabilitation , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robotic devices for physical rehabilitation of stroke patients: fundamental requirements, target therapeutic techniques, and preliminary designs , 1996 .

[12]  H. Busser,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of physical activity in working situations, a validation study. , 1998, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[13]  J. Saunders,et al.  The major determinants in normal and pathological gait. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  J. Callaghan Medical engineering & physics. , 2005, Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference.

[15]  Roland R Roy,et al.  Rehabilitative therapies after spinal cord injury. , 2006, Journal of neurotrauma.

[16]  U. Wyss,et al.  Review of arm motion analyses , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[17]  G M Lyons,et al.  A description of an accelerometer-based mobility monitoring technique. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  V Popescu,et al.  Virtual reality-based orthopedic telerehabilitation. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  P H Veltink,et al.  Detection of static and dynamic activities using uniaxial accelerometers. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  G. Schmidt,et al.  Inertial sensor technology trends , 2001 .

[22]  R. V. van Lummel,et al.  The accuracy of measuring the kinematics of rising from a chair with accelerometers and gyroscopes. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  G. Harris,et al.  An upper extremity kinematic model for evaluation of hemiparetic stroke. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  N. Hogan,et al.  Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  J. Cauraugh,et al.  Two Coupled Motor Recovery Protocols Are Better Than One: Electromyogram-Triggered Neuromuscular Stimulation and Bilateral Movements , 2002, Stroke.