Robust and general method for determining surface fluid flow boundary conditions in articular cartilage contact mechanics modeling.

Contact detection in cartilage contact mechanics is an important feature of any analytical or computational modeling investigation when the biphasic nature of cartilage and the corresponding tribology are taken into account. The fluid flow boundary conditions will change based on whether the surface is in contact or not, which will affect the interstitial fluid pressurization. This in turn will increase or decrease the load sustained by the fluid phase, with a direct effect on friction, wear, and lubrication. In laboratory experiments or clinical hemiarthroplasty, when a rigid indenter or metallic prosthesis is used to apply load to the cartilage, there will not be any fluid flow normal to the surface in the contact region due to the impermeable nature of the indenter/prosthesis. In the natural joint, on the other hand, where two cartilage surfaces interact, flow will depend on the pressure difference across the interface. Furthermore, in both these cases, the fluid would flow freely in non-contacting regions. However, it should be pointed out that the contact area is generally unknown in advance in both cases and can only be determined as part of the solution. In the present finite element study, a general and robust algorithm was proposed to decide nodes in contact on the cartilage surface and, accordingly, impose the fluid flow boundary conditions. The algorithm was first tested for a rigid indenter against cartilage model. The algorithm worked well for two-dimensional four-noded and eight-noded axisymmetric element models as well as three-dimensional models. It was then extended to include two cartilages in contact. The results were in excellent agreement with the previous studies reported in the literature.

[1]  W. A. Hodge,et al.  Contact pressures in the human hip joint measured in vivo. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  Effect of dynamic loading on the frictional response of bovine articular cartilage. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  M. Holmes Finite deformation of soft tissue: analysis of a mixture model in uni-axial compression. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Warner Finite element biphasic modelling of articular cartilage : an investigation into crystal induced damage. , 2000 .

[6]  William R. Taylor,et al.  A method for determining contact between a non-porous surface and articular cartilage in a biphasic FE model , 2001 .

[7]  Robert L Spilker,et al.  A Lagrange multiplier mixed finite element formulation for three-dimensional contact of biphasic tissues. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  Van C. Mow,et al.  Recent Developments in Synovial Joint Biomechanics , 1980 .

[9]  G. Ateshian,et al.  Rolling resistance of articular cartilage due to interstitial fluid flow , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Effect of fluid boundary conditions on joint contact mechanics and applications to the modeling of osteoarthritic joints. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  Walter Herzog,et al.  An improved solution for the contact of two biphasic cartilage layers , 1997 .

[12]  M J Rudert,et al.  Indentation assessment of biphasic mechanical property deficits in size-dependent osteochondral defect repair. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Compressive properties of mouse articular cartilage determined in a novel micro-indentation test method and biphasic finite element model. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  V. Mow The Role of Lubrication in Biomechanical Joints , 1969 .

[15]  Gerard A. Ateshian,et al.  The Role of Interstitial Fluid Pressurization and Surface Porosities on the Boundary Friction of Articular Cartilage , 1998 .

[16]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Erratum: “Effect of Fluid Boundary Conditions on Joint Contact Mechanics and Applications to the Modelling of Osteoarthritic Joints,” J. Biomech. Eng., 126(2), pp. 220–225 , 2005 .

[17]  V C Mow,et al.  A finite element analysis of the indentation stress-relaxation response of linear biphasic articular cartilage. , 1992, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  Robert L. Spilker,et al.  A contact finite element formulation for biological soft hydrated tissues , 1998 .

[19]  R W Mann,et al.  Cartilage stresses in the human hip joint. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[20]  D. Dowson,et al.  The effect of stationary loading on the friction and boundary lubrication of articular cartilage in the mixed lubrication regime , 1995 .

[21]  W M Lai,et al.  Boundary conditions at the cartilage-synovial fluid interface for joint lubrication and theoretical verifications. , 1989, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  Jack L. Lewis,et al.  Poroviscoelastic cartilage properties in the mouse from indentation. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  J. G. Andrews,et al.  A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  R W Mann,et al.  Contact pressures from an instrumented hip endoprosthesis. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  W. Herzog,et al.  Finite Element Simulation of Location- and Time-Dependent Mechanical Behavior of Chondrocytes in Unconfined Compression Tests , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.