Expected efficiency based on directional distance function in data envelopment analysis

Abstract Directional distance function (DDF), an evaluation technique that estimates relative efficiency of a decision making unit (DMU) along a pre-determined direction vector that is not restricted by the radial direction, has been widespread in productive efficiency research over the past two decades. A key challenge in DDF applications, however, is to decide on an appropriate (or the best) direction along which to measure efficiency. To circumvent this issue, we build on the DDF model and propose expected efficiency in efficiency estimation. Expected efficiency is defined as the mean value of all relative efficiency scores of a DMU along all directions. When calculating the overall relative efficiency score of a DMU, the expected efficiency model incorporates all possible directions rather than choosing a particular direction. As such, the expected efficiency approach extends DDF from a single direction to all directions. Some benefits of the expected efficiency approach include (1) relieving a decision maker of the burden of determining a particular directional vector among many choices; (2) overcoming a decision maker’s subjectivity in the direction selection; (3) resolving the sensitivity issue caused by choosing different directions; and (4) ensuring that all DMUs are estimated in a consistent and equitable manner. Our study contributes to productive efficiency research and data envelopment analysis by introducing a new efficiency estimate that does not need to rely on one specific direction. Using two examples, we demonstrate the validity and the robustness of expected efficiency as an alternative efficiency estimate.

[1]  Marvin B. Lieberman,et al.  Assessing the Resource Base of Japanese and U.S. Auto Producers: A Stochastic Frontier Production Function Approach , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  The directional distance function and the translation invariance property , 2016 .

[3]  Chulwoo Baek,et al.  The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[4]  Mette Asmild,et al.  Measuring Inefficiency Via Potential Improvements , 2003 .

[5]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  A non-radial directional distance method on classifying inputs and outputs in DEA: Application to banking industry , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  Child maturation, time-invariant, and time-varying inputs: their interaction in the production of child human capital , 2012 .

[7]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Statistical inference for DEA estimators of directional distances , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Ke Wang,et al.  On selecting directions for directional distance functions in a non-parametric framework: a review , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[9]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Measuring the industrial performance of Chinese cities by data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[10]  Jie Wu,et al.  Extended secondary goal models for weights selection in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[11]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[13]  Jens J. Krüger,et al.  Technical efficiency of automobiles: A nonparametric approach incorporating carbon dioxide emissions , 2014 .

[14]  Ning Zhang,et al.  A note on the evolution of directional distance function and its development in energy and environmental studies 1997–2013 , 2014 .

[15]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A note on the application of the data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection , 2009 .

[17]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models , 1995, Oper. Res. Lett..

[18]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[19]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[20]  C. Kao,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[21]  Vicente Vargas,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMENTARIES OWNERSHIP, ORGANIZATION, AND PRIVATE FIRMS’ EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES , 2003 .

[22]  Dong-Woon Noh,et al.  Approximating pollution abatement costs via alternative specifications of a multi-output production technology: a case of the US electric utility industry. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Empirical tools to assess the sensitivity of directional distance functions to direction selection , 2012 .

[25]  R. Färe,et al.  Directional output distance functions: endogenous directions based on exogenous normalization constraints , 2013 .

[26]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[27]  Jens J. Krüger,et al.  Radar scanning the world production frontier , 2016 .

[28]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  Rules Versus Discretion: The Productivity Consequences of Flexible Regulation , 2001 .

[29]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[30]  Panagiotis D. Zervopoulos,et al.  Estimating the technical efficiency of health care systems: A cross-country comparison using the directional distance function , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Necmi Kemal Avkiran,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of network DEA: NSBM versus NRAM , 2012, Appl. Math. Comput..

[33]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  The directional distance function and measurement of super-efficiency: an application to airlines data , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[34]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[35]  George Emm. Halkos,et al.  A conditional directional distance function approach for measuring regional environmental efficiency: Evidence from UK regions , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Joe Zhu Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure , 1996 .

[37]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[38]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Production Frontier Methodologies and Efficiency as a Performance Measure in Strategic Management Research , 2013 .

[39]  D. Luenberger Benefit functions and duality , 1992 .

[40]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[41]  Jie Wu,et al.  Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights , 2013 .

[42]  John S. Liu,et al.  A survey of DEA applications , 2013 .

[43]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  Finding the most efficient DMUs in DEA: An improved integrated model , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[44]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016 , 2018 .

[45]  R. Shepherd Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .