Differential Object Marking

[1]  Andrew Spencer,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Case , 2008 .

[2]  Colette G. Craig.  The structure of Jacaltec , 1977 .

[3]  E. Woolford,et al.  Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[4]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Case and licensing , 2000 .

[5]  Paul Kroeger,et al.  Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog , 1992 .

[6]  Irene Heim,et al.  Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs , 1992, J. Semant..

[7]  Vladimir P. Nedjalkov,et al.  Contrasting the absolutive in Chuckchee , 1987 .

[8]  Joseph E. Emonds,et al.  The invisible category principle6 , 1987 .

[9]  Beth Levin,et al.  Dative verbs: A crosslinguistic perspective , 2008 .

[10]  D. Adger,et al.  Predication and Equation , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[11]  E. Battistella.  The Logic of Markedness , 1996 .

[12]  A. Kratzer.  Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[13]  A. Kroch,et al.  Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[14]  Julie Anne Legate,et al.  Morphological and Abstract Case , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[15]  Sandra Chung,et al.  The Design of Agreement: Evidence from Chamorro , 1998 .

[16]  Dovid Katz.  Grammar of the Yiddish Language , 1987 .

[17]  Georgette Ioup,et al.  Specificity and the interpretation of quantifiers , 1977, Linguistics and Philosophy.

[18]  Horst Isenberg.  Das direkte Objekt im Spanischen , 1968 .

[19]  Sander Lestrade,et al.  The Space of Case , 2007 .

[20]  Moshe Taube.  The Usual Suspects: Slavic, Yiddish, and the Accusative Existentials and Possessives in Modern Hebrew , 2015 .

[21]  T. Stowell,et al.  Distributivity and Negation: The Syntax of Each and Every , 1997 .

[22]  Jóhanna Barðdal.  The rise of Dative Substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar account , 2011 .

[23]  Maureen Weissenreider.  Exceptional Uses of the Accusative a , 1985 .

[24]  R. Larson.  On the double object construction , 1988 .

[25]  Sandra Chung.  Identifiability and Null Objects in Chamorro , 1984 .

[26]  Barry J. Blake,et al.  A Kalkatungu grammar , 1979 .

[27]  Norvin Richards,et al.  Lardil “Case Stacking” and the Timing of Case Assignment , 2013 .

[28]  M. Krifka.  The Origins of Telicity , 1998 .

[29]  Cliff Goddard,et al.  Case systems and case marking in Australian languages: A new interpretation , 1982 .

[30]  Olga Kagan,et al.  Genitive objects, existence and individuation , 2010 .

[31]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  Markedness, Grammar, People, and the World , 1986 .

[32]  Erich R. Round.  Kayardild morphology, phonology and morphosyntax , 2009 .

[33]  Idan Landau,et al.  Possessor raising and the structure of VP , 1999 .

[34]  Veerle van Geenhoven,et al.  On the property analysis of opaque complements , 2005 .

[35]  Louise McNally,et al.  Bare plurals in Spanish are interpreted as properties. , 2004 .

[36]  Olga Kagan.  Semantics of Genitive Objects in Russian , 2013 .

[37]  Brenda Laca,et al.  Sobre el uso del acusativo preposicional en español , 1987 .

[38]  Gabi Danon,et al.  Syntactic definiteness in the grammar of Modern Hebrew , 2001 .

[39]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies , 1966 .

[40]  André Meinunger,et al.  Datives and other cases : between argument structure and event structure , 2006 .

[41]  David R. Dowty.  Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[42]  Asya Pereltsvaig,et al.  The Tatar DP , 2015, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[43]  Reinhard Blutner,et al.  Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation , 2000, J. Semant..

[44]  Esther Torrego Salcedo,et al.  El complemento directo preposicional , 1999 .

[45]  George Fowler,et al.  Oblique Passivization in Russian , 1996 .

[46]  Barbara Citko,et al.  Small clauses reconsidered: Not so small and not all alike , 2008 .

[47]  J. Maling.  Dative: The heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case, grammatical functions, and thematic roles , 2001 .

[48]  Kristina Sands.  Complement Clauses and Grammatical Relations in Finnish , 2011 .

[49]  S. H. Kellogg,et al.  Grammar of the Hindi Language , 1989 .

[50]  H. de Hoop,et al.  Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation , 1996 .

[51]  Norvin Richards,et al.  Lardil "Case Stacking" and the Structural/Inherent Case Distinction , 2007 .

[52]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity1 , 2008, Journal of Linguistics.

[53]  Klaus von Heusinger,et al.  The case of accusative embedded subjects in Mongolian , 2011 .

[54]  Erica C. García,et al.  La mejor palabra es la que no se habla , 1995 .

[55]  Comrie Bernard.  Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[56]  Sandro Zucchi.  INCOMPLETE EVENTS, INTENSIONALITY AND IMPERFECTIVE ASPECT , 1999 .

[57]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Information structure and sentence form , 1994 .

[58]  In Que Lee,et al.  Dative constructions and case theory in Korean , 1997 .

[59]  William A. Foley,et al.  The Languages of New Guinea , 2000 .

[60]  Vera Lee-Schoenfeld,et al.  German possessor datives: raised and affected , 2006 .

[61]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[62]  Claudia Maienborn.  A Discourse-Based Account of Spanish ser/estar , 2005 .

[63]  Stephen Wechsler,et al.  The domain of direct case assignment , 1996 .

[64]  Ann M. Cooreman,et al.  Transitivity and discourse continuity in Chamorro narratives , 1987 .

[65]  A. Davison.  Syntactic markedness and the definition of sentence topic , 1984 .

[66]  Jeffrey Heath,et al.  Basic materials in Ritharngu: Grammar, texts, and dictionary , 1980 .

[67]  Michael B Smith,et al.  The polysemy of German es, iconicity, and the notion of conceptual distance , 2002 .

[68]  Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin,et al.  The Syntax of Romanian , 1993 .

[69]  R. Freeze.  EXISTENTIALS AND OTHER LOCATIVES , 1992 .

[70]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  The Informational Component , 1990 .

[71]  A. Pereltsvaig.  On the nature of intra-clausal relations : a study of copular sentences in Russian and Italian , 2001 .

[72]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  The Grammar of Accusative Case in Kannada , 2006 .

[73]  Edith A. Moravcsik,et al.  Universals of human language , 1978 .

[74]  Michael Silverstein,et al.  Case marking and the nature of language , 1981 .

[75]  Maureen Weissenrieder,et al.  Variable Uses of the Direct-Object Marker A , 1990 .

[76]  Michael C. Shapiro,et al.  Outline of Hindi Grammar , 1974 .

[77]  Zeno Vendler,et al.  Verbs and Times , 1957, The Language of Time - A Reader.

[78]  Ljudmila Geist,et al.  The argument structure of predicate adjectives in Russian , 2010 .

[79]  David Magier.  The transitivity prototype: evidence from Hindi , 1987 .

[80]  Maureen Weissenrieder,et al.  A Functional Approach to the Accusative A , 1991 .

[81]  P. Boersma,et al.  Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[82]  E. Battistella.  Markedness: The Evaluative Superstructure of Language , 1990 .

[83]  A. Wierzbicka.  Case marking and human nature , 1981 .

[84]  Anne Vainikka,et al.  The Finnish accusative: Long-distance case assignment under agreement , 2014 .

[85]  T. Reinhart.  Quantifier Scope: How labor is Divided Between QR and Choice Functions , 1997 .

[86]  Paul Kiparsky,et al.  Structural case in finnish , 2001 .

[87]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Interpreting uninterpretable features , 2003 .

[88]  A. Kratzer.  Scope or Pseudoscope? Are there Wide-Scope Indefinites? , 1998 .

[89]  Andrej Malchukov,et al.  On fluid differential case marking: A bidirectional OT approach , 2007 .

[90]  Maria Cristina Cuervo,et al.  Datives at large , 2003 .

[91]  L. McNally.  Existential Sentences without Existential Quantification , 1998 .

[92]  Gemma Rigau,et al.  Some remarks on the nature of strong pronouns in null-subject languages , 1986 .

[93]  Andrew Chesterman,et al.  On Definiteness: On Definiteness , 1991 .

[94]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[95]  Klaus von Heusinger,et al.  Specificity and Definiteness in Sentence and Discourse Structure , 2002, J. Semant..

[96]  Masako Ueda.  Set-membership interpretations and the genitive of negation , 1993 .

[97]  Jaklin Kornfilt,et al.  Scrambling, Subscrambling, and Case in Turkish , 2008 .

[98]  T. Mohanan.  Argument structure in Hindi , 1994 .

[99]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  The Theta System – an overview , 2003 .

[100]  L. H. Babby.  Case, prequantifiers, and discontinuous agreement in Russian , 1987 .

[101]  T. Givón,et al.  Topic continuity in discourse : a quantitative cross-language study , 1983 .

[102]  Anthony Rodrigues Aristar.  Marking and Hierarchy Types and the Grammaticalization of Case-Markers , 1997 .

[103]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[104]  Eser Erguvanh,et al.  Case Marking in Turkish Indefinite Object Constructions , 1994 .

[105]  Tania Ionin,et al.  This is Definitely Specific: Specificity and Definiteness in Article Systems , 2006 .

[106]  Judith Aissen.  On the syntax of obviation , 1997 .

[107]  ЕЛЕНА ВИКТОРОВНА ПАДУЧЕВА.  О СЕМАНТИЧЕСКОМ ПОДХОДЕ К СИНТАКСИСУ И ГЕНИТИВНОМ СУБЪЕКТЕ ГЛАГОЛА БЬТЬ , 1992 .

[108]  T. Zimmermann.  On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs , 1992 .

[109]  Nora C. England,et al.  Ergativity in Mamean (Mayan) Languages , 1983, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[110]  A. Belletti.  The case of unacussatives , 1988 .

[111]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[112]  Nomi Erteschik-Shir,et al.  Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface , 2007 .

[113]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Icelandic Case and the Structure of Events , 2002 .

[114]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy , 2003 .

[115]  David Pesetsky,et al.  Paths and categories , 1982 .

[116]  C. Ruiz.  El complemento directo preposicional: estado de la cuestión y bibliografía comentada , 1995 .

[117]  T. Givón.  The pragmatics of de-transitive voice , 1994 .

[118]  B. Blake.  Case by Barry J. Blake , 2001 .

[119]  Andrej Malchukov,et al.  Tense, aspect, and mood based differential case marking , 2011 .

[120]  Anne Marjatta Vainikka,et al.  Deriving syntactic representations in Finnish , 1989 .

[121]  Louise McNally,et al.  Bare nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan1 , 2010, Journal of Linguistics.

[122]  Ilse Depraetere,et al.  On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity , 1995 .

[123]  P. Strawson.  III.—ON REFERRING , 1950 .

[124]  Donka F. Farkas.  Direct and Indirect Object Reduplication in Romanian , 1978 .

[125]  Anthony Rodrigues Aristar.  The relationship between dative and locative : Kuryłowicz's argument from a typological perspective , 1996 .

[126]  David Pesetsky,et al.  Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation , 1998 .

[127]  Shin Fukuda,et al.  Object Case and Event Type: Accusative-Dative Object Case Alternation in Japanese , 2007 .

[128]  Klaus von Heusinger,et al.  Verbal semantics and the diachronic development of DOM in Spanish , 2008 .

[129]  Udo Klein,et al.  Case and referential properties , 2011 .

[130]  Tonia Bleam,et al.  The role of semantic type in differential object marking , 2005 .

[131]  J. T. de Jong,et al.  The case of bound pronouns in peripheral Romance , 1996 .

[132]  Heidi Harley,et al.  A force-theoretic framework for event structure , 2015, Linguistics and Philosophy.

[133]  Peter Austin,et al.  Case marking in Southern Pilbara languages , 1981 .

[134]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[135]  G. Corbett,et al.  Predicate nouns in Russian , 2008 .

[136]  J. Haiman,et al.  Iconicity in Syntax , 1987 .

[137]  Shobhana Lakshmi Chelliah,et al.  Introduction: The role of semantic, pragmatic and discourse factors in the development of case , 2009 .

[138]  Alice Davison,et al.  Structural Case, Lexical Case and the Verbal Projection , 2004 .

[139]  Mürvet Enç.  The semantics of specificity , 1991 .

[140]  Michael B Smith,et al.  The Conceptual Structure of German Impersonal Constructions , 2005, Journal of Germanic Linguistics.

[141]  R. Jackendoff.  The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in english , 1996 .

[142]  Andrej L. Malchukov,et al.  Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking , 2008 .

[143]  B. Partee,et al.  EXISTENTIAL SENTENCES, BE, AND THE GENITIVE OF NEGATION IN RUSSIAN , 2002 .

[144]  Gillian Catriona Ramchand.  Licensing of Instrumental Case in Hindi/Urdu Causatives , 2011 .

[145]  Tej K. Bhatia,et al.  Punjabi: A Cognitive-Descriptive Grammar , 2013 .

[146]  Olga Kagan.  On Speaker Identifiability , 2011 .

[147]  Leonard H. Babby,et al.  The Deep Structure of Adjectives and Participles in Russian. , 1973 .

[148]  Klaus von Heusinger,et al.  Affectedness and Differential Object Marking in Spanish , 2011 .

[149]  James W. Gair,et al.  Colloquial Sinhalese Clause Structures , 1970 .

[150]  Andrew Chesterman.  On Definiteness by Andrew Chesterman , 1991 .