Product complexity and supply chain design

To assemble a product, each and every part is required. Hence, the more parts in the product, the greater the risk of disruption. Compared with retailers or assemblers of simple products, manufacturers of complex products are much more sensitive to supply chain delays. This heightened vulnerability to supply chain disruptions should lead complex product assemblers to design less risky supply chains. Supply chain design should depend on the complexity of the product assembled or manufactured. This paper models how product complexity drives the likelihood of disruption for given component supply chain reliabilities. The paper provides insights for supply chain design that comprehends the impact of product complexity.

[1]  Joel D. Wisner,et al.  Forecasting Practices In Purchasing , 1994 .

[2]  T. Kippenberger Lean production in an international supply chain , 1997 .

[3]  D. Blumenfeld Operations Research Calculations Handbook , 2001 .

[4]  Mary J. Meixell,et al.  Global supply chain design: A literature review and critique , 2005 .

[5]  Young M. Lee,et al.  Managing product availability in an assemble-to-order supply chain with multiple customer segments , 2009, OR Spectr..

[6]  I. Chen,et al.  Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements , 2004 .

[7]  Yannick Frein,et al.  An optimisation model for the design of global multi-echelon supply chains under lead time constraints , 2013 .

[8]  A.R. Barros,et al.  Toward a resilient Supply Chain with supply disturbances , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[9]  Amy Z. Zeng,et al.  Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks , 2009 .

[10]  Michael A. Hitt Relevance of Strategic Management Theory and Research for Supply Chain Management , 2011 .

[11]  D. Morris,et al.  Supplier parks in the automotive industry , 2004 .

[12]  K. Clark,et al.  Lead time in automobile product development explaining the Japanese advantage , 1989 .

[13]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  A call for theory: The maturation of the supply chain management discipline , 2011 .

[14]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Designing supply chains: Towards theory development , 2006 .

[15]  Giovanni Lucchetta,et al.  Integrated Design Analysis for Product Simplification , 2005 .

[16]  M. Holweg,et al.  Successful Build-to-Order Strategies Start With the Customer , 2001 .

[17]  Germaine H. Saad,et al.  Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains , 2005 .

[18]  Geraldo Ferrer,et al.  Value of information in remanufacturing complex products , 2004 .

[19]  S. Chopra,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning & Operation , 2007 .

[20]  Terry Williams,et al.  Operations Management: Production of Goods and Services , 1980 .

[21]  Robert R. Inman,et al.  Inventory is the flower of all evil , 1993 .

[22]  M. Fisher What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[23]  Christopher S. Tang Perspectives in supply chain risk management , 2006 .

[24]  G. Zsidisin,et al.  An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management , 2005 .

[25]  Christopher S. Tang Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions , 2006 .

[26]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Mass Customization at Hewlett-Packard : The Power of Postponement , 1999 .

[27]  Nukala Viswanadham,et al.  Robust supply chain design: a strategic approach for exception handling , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[28]  Jörn-Henrik Thun,et al.  An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry , 2011 .

[29]  D. Simchi-Levi Operations Rules: Delivering Customer Value through Flexible Operations , 2010 .

[30]  Chu‐Hua Kuei,et al.  Designing and Managing the Supply Chain Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies , 2000 .

[31]  D. Waters Supply Chain Risk Management: Vulnerability and Resilience in Logistics , 2007 .

[32]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  The product-relationship-matrix as framework for strategic supply chain design based on operations theory , 2009 .

[33]  John T. Mentzer,et al.  The new supply chain agenda : the five steps that drive real value , 2010 .

[34]  Jill Daniels,et al.  Beneath the surface. , 2002, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[35]  T. Skjøtt-Larsen,et al.  Complementary theories to supply chain management , 2007 .

[36]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Vendor Performance With Supply Risk: A Chance-Constrained DEA Approach , 2006 .

[37]  B. Tabrizi,et al.  Defining next-generation products: an inside look. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[38]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  An exploratory investigation of the effects of supply chain complexity on delivery performance , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[39]  Mark Crone,et al.  Are global supply chains too risky? : a practitioner's perspective , 2007 .

[40]  R. Henry,et al.  MAKING SENSE OF SUPPLY DISRUPTION RISK RESEARCH: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK GROUNDED IN ENACTMENT THEORY , 2011 .

[41]  David L. Levy International Sourcing and Supply Chain Stability , 1995 .

[42]  Cecil Bozarth,et al.  The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance , 2009 .