A systems approach to flood vulnerability

ABSTRACT Flood vulnerability is an internationally important problem with no easy solution. In this paper it is argued that vulnerability is an emergent output of interacting human and engineering components, and that to make further progress on usefully deploying the concept, a systems approach is needed. The existing state of the art in Flood Vulnerability Indices is blended with a constraints-based systems engineering approach called an Abstraction Hierarchy. Four existing towns were modelled using this approach, and the impact of a 1–200 year flood was assessed, by focusing on the key interactions within the model. As the flood waters progressively removed physical objects in the system, higher-level processes and functions became systematically degraded. Via this process, the modelled towns were revealed to be low on exposure, high on susceptibility, but low on resilience. This is one of eight vulnerability types possible. Different flood risk solutions can be associated with different vulnerability types. Comparing these outputs to real-life policy and practice reveals some interesting areas of mismatch.

[1]  Martijn Gough Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[2]  Ioana Popescu,et al.  Application of a coastal modelling code in fluvial environments , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Ioana Popescu,et al.  Parametric and physically based modelling techniques for flood risk and vulnerability assessment: A comparison , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  Robyn Hopcroft,et al.  Work Domain Analysis: Theoretical Concepts and Methodology , 2005 .

[5]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  A dynamic assessment tool for exploring and communicating vulnerability to floods and climate change , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Nicolas G. Wright,et al.  Reducing the complexity of the flood vulnerability index , 2010 .

[7]  J. Chaplin Dictionary of psychology , 1975 .

[8]  Aleksandra Kazmierczak,et al.  Surface water flooding risk to urban communities: Analysis of vulnerability, hazard and exposure , 2011 .

[9]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[10]  James P. Lewis,et al.  Development in Disaster-Prone Places: Studies of Vulnerability , 1999 .

[11]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[12]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[13]  Ning Li,et al.  A relative vulnerability estimation of flood disaster using data envelopment analysis in the Dongting Lake region of Hunan , 2013 .

[14]  池谷 壽夫,et al.  Vulnerability: reflections on a new ethical foundation for law and politics , 2013 .

[15]  A. E. Risø,et al.  The Human Data Processor an a System Component , 2007 .

[16]  N. Wright,et al.  Flood vulnerability indices at varying spatial scales. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  Neelam Naikar Work Domain Analysis: Concepts, Guidelines, and Cases , 2013 .

[18]  Linda J. Sorensen,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Coping with Complexity , 2010 .

[19]  H. Kundel,et al.  Measurement of observer agreement. , 2003, Radiology.

[20]  A. E. K. R. Risø-M The human data processor as a system component. Bits and pieces of a model , 2007 .

[21]  swright National Risk Register of Civil Emergencies , 2015 .

[22]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[23]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Command and control in emergency services operations: a social network analysis , 2006, Ergonomics.

[24]  David A. Winkler,et al.  Classification of emergence and its relation to self-organization , 2008, Complex..

[25]  Jaroslav Mysiak,et al.  Assessing Direct and Indirect Economic Impacts of a Flood Event Through the Integration of Spatial and Computable General Equilibrium Modelling , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  E. Glover DICTIONARY OF PSYCHOLOGY , 1959 .

[27]  Anne van der Veen,et al.  Economic Hotspots: Visualizing Vulnerability to Flooding , 2005 .

[28]  J. Rassmusen,et al.  Information Processing and Human - Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[29]  N.A. Stanton,et al.  Levels of abstraction in human supervisory control teams , 2006, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..