Dynamic interplays between memory systems depend on practice: The hippocampus is not always the first to provide solution

Previous studies showed that the optimization of behavioral performance through extended training depends on a switch from hippocampus-based memory to striatum-based habit. Here we investigate whether the amount of training within one learning session influences the retention of memory for hippocampal versus striatal strategies. Mice were trained to search for a submerged cue-marked platform which remained in the same spatial location in the water-maze for each of three training regimens (4, 12 or 22 trials). Subsequently, they were either tested for retention of memory 1 h or 24 h later on a probe test or killed at different time points over a 7-h period to determine the kinetic of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation in both memory systems. During the probe test mice had to choose between a submerged platform located in the same position as during the acquisition phase (spatial solution) and a platform marked by the cue but located in the opposite quadrant of the pool (cue-guided solution). Results showed that the animals first preferred the cue-marked platform, which represents a strategy that was selectively impaired by lesions of the dorsolateral caudate-putamen. With further practice, or context pre-exposure, animals transiently favored the hippocampus-dependent place solution but finally, both strategies became interchangeable and insensitive to either lesion. CREB phosphorylation increased in both memory systems following acquisition but training-dependent changes selectively occurred in the hippocampus wherein biphasic activation was initiated by the four-trial training and blocked by training for 22 trials. These findings indicate that learning in one session consists of three acquisition stages with parallel engagement of multiple memory systems at the beginning of learning. They suggest, however, that, in a later phase, dynamic interplays promote the use of the most adapted brain system depending on practice and this is accompanied by specific patterns of CREB phosphorylation in the hippocampus.

[1]  M. Packard.  Glutamate infused posttraining into the hippocampus or caudate-putamen differentially strengthens place and response learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Killcross,et al.  Inactivation of the infralimbic prefrontal cortex reinstates goal-directed responding in overtrained rats , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  M. Petrides,et al.  Cognitive Strategies Dependent on the Hippocampus and Caudate Nucleus in Human Navigation: Variability and Change with Practice , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Multiple memory systems: The power of interactions , 2004, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[5]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Inactivation of Hippocampus or Caudate Nucleus with Lidocaine Differentially Affects Expression of Place and Response Learning , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[6]  J. Guillou,et al.  Differential Activation of Adenylyl Cyclases by Spatial and Procedural Learning , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Jaffard,et al.  Intrahippocampal injections of cysteamine improve the retention of a bar-pressing task in mice , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  M. Packard,et al.  Affective modulation of multiple memory systems , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  J. Frey,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Brief Acute Stress on Cellular Signaling and Hippocampal LTP , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  P. Holland.  Event representation in Pavlovian conditioning: Image and action , 1990, Cognition.

[11]  E. Tolman.  There is more than one kind of learning. , 1949, Psychological review.

[12]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Double dissociation of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on acquisition of two water maze tasks: further evidence for multiple memory systems. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  B. Bontempi,et al.  Time-dependent reorganization of brain circuitry underlying long-term memory storage , 1999, Nature.

[14]  Paul E. Gold,et al.  Coordination of multiple memory systems , 2004, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[15]  L. H. Hicks.  Effects of Overtraining on Acquisition and Reversal of Place and Response Learning , 1964 .

[16]  R. Morris.  Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat , 1984, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  J L McGaugh,et al.  Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide-mediated disruption of hippocampal cAMP response element binding protein levels impairs consolidation of memory for water maze training. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  B. Bontempi,et al.  Sites of Neocortical Reorganization Critical for Remote Spatial Memory , 2004, Science.

[19]  P. Colombo,et al.  Cognitive Strategy-Specific Increases in Phosphorylated cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein and c-Fos in the Hippocampus and Dorsal Striatum , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Grillner,et al.  Mechanisms for selection of basic motor programs – roles for the striatum and pallidum , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  E. Kandel,et al.  CREB, memory enhancement and the treatment of memory disorders: promises, pitfalls and prospects , 2003, Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.

[22]  J. Frey,et al.  Plasticity-specific phosphorylation of CaMKII, MAP-kinases and CREB during late-LTP in rat hippocampal slices in vitro , 2005, Neuropharmacology.

[23]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Parallel information processing in the water maze: evidence for independent memory systems involving dorsal striatum and hippocampus. , 1994, Behavioral and neural biology.

[24]  I Izquierdo,et al.  Involvement of hippocampal cAMP/cAMP-dependent protein kinase signaling pathways in a late memory consolidation phase of aversively motivated learning in rats. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  George Paxinos,et al.  The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 2001 .

[26]  Y. Dudai,et al.  Differential Pattern of cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein Activation in the Rat Brain after Conditioned Aversion as a Function of the Associative Process Engaged: Taste versus Context Association , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  M Krug,et al.  Direct Evidence for Biphasic cAMP Responsive Element-Binding Protein Phosphorylation during Long-Term Potentiation in the Rat Dentate Gyrus In Vivo , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Clark,et al.  Rats depend on habit memory for discrimination learning and retention. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[29]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Guillén Fernández,et al.  Interaction between the Human Hippocampus and the Caudate Nucleus during Route Recognition , 2004, Neuron.

[31]  E. Kandel,et al.  Impaired Bidirectional Synaptic Plasticity and Procedural Memory Formation in Striatum-Specific cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein-Deficient Mice , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  B. Ritchie,et al.  Studies in spatial learning; place performance and the acquisition of place dispositions. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[33]  E. Nestler,et al.  The many faces of CREB , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  H. Viola,et al.  Detection of novelty, but not memory of spatial habituation, is associated with an increase in phosphorylated cAMP response element‐binding protein levels in the hippocampus , 2004, Hippocampus.

[35]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Multiple Parallel Memory Systems in the Brain of the Rat , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[36]  M. Fanselow.  Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning , 1990 .

[37]  N. Mons,et al.  CREB antisense oligodeoxynucleotide administration into the dorsal hippocampal CA3 region impairs long- but not short-term spatial memory in mice. , 2006, Learning & memory.

[38]  E. Tolman,et al.  Studies in spatial learning; place learning versus response learning. , 1946, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  R Hen,et al.  5-HT1B Receptor Knock-Out Mice Exhibit Increased Exploratory Activity and Enhanced Spatial Memory Performance in the Morris Water Maze , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Jeansok J Kim,et al.  Multiple brain-memory systems: the whole does not equal the sum of its parts , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  J. W. Rudy,et al.  The Role of the Dorsal Hippocampus in the Acquisition and Retrieval of Context Memory Representations , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  B. Balleine,et al.  Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates , 1998, Neuropharmacology.

[43]  P. E. Gold,et al.  Switching Memory Systems during Learning: Changes in Patterns of Brain Acetylcholine Release in the Hippocampus and Striatum in Rats , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  N. White,et al.  Parallel Information Processing in the Dorsal Striatum: Relation to Hippocampal Function , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Gernot Riedel,et al.  Foreground contextual fear memory consolidation requires two independent phases of hippocampal ERK/CREB activation. , 2006, Learning & memory.

[46]  D. Moncada,et al.  Phosphorylation state of CREB in the rat hippocampus: A molecular switch between spatial novelty and spatial familiarity? , 2006, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[47]  R. Jaffard,et al.  Stimulation of hippocampal adenylyl cyclase activity dissociates memory consolidation processes for response and place learning. , 2006, Learning & memory.

[48]  P. Frankland,et al.  The organization of recent and remote memories , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[49]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Information acquired by the hippocampus interferes with acquisition of the amygdala‐based conditioned‐cue preference in the rat , 1995, Hippocampus.