Digitally enabling social networks: resolving IT–culture conflict

Digitally enabled social networks, encompassing social media applications such as wikis, blogs and social networking sites, have the potential to dramatically change organizational culture by building communities, promoting information sharing and fostering collaboration. Although organizational social media site (hereinafter SMS) implementations are proliferating, these technologies often do not harmoniously combine with traditional organizational cultures. To shed light on social media's impact on organizational life, this paper draws on an interpretive case study to investigate a global security company's efforts to implement a digitally enabled social network as part of a cultural change effort. Conceptually, based on the theory of IT–culture conflict, this paper underscores the interplay between organizational culture and technology. Our study finds that conflicts can arise between employees' workplace values and the values they ascribe to social media. This can result in an IT–culture system conflict, which organizations can address using policy‐based, socialization‐based and leadership‐based mechanisms aimed at bringing cultural values and social media site values into alignment.

[1]  Yong Tan,et al.  Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from YouTube , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[3]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Cultural differences in the online behavior of consumers , 2002, CACM.

[4]  James Bennett,et al.  Workplace impact of social networking , 2010 .

[5]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Grounded theorizing for electronically mediated social contexts , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Min Zheng,et al.  Experimental Study of a Self-Tuning Algorithm for DBMS Buffer Pools , 2005, J. Database Manag..

[7]  S. O'Donohoe,et al.  Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies , 2008 .

[8]  K. Riemer,et al.  Corporate Social Networking Sites – Modes of Use and Appropriation through Co-Evolution , 2009 .

[9]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Groups Formation and Operations in the Web 2.0 Environment and Social Networks , 2008 .

[10]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..

[11]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[12]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[13]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  P. Gamble,et al.  Executive Values and Decision Making: The Relationship of Culture and Information Flows , 1999 .

[16]  L. Lawley Corporate Blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk , 2006 .

[17]  D. Leidner,et al.  Individual and organizational effectiveness: perspectives on the impact of ESS in multinational organizations , 1996 .

[18]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[19]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Management Practices , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Corporate wiki users: results of a survey , 2006, WikiSym '06.

[21]  C. Wagner,et al.  Supporting knowledge management in organizations with conversational technologies: Discussion forums, weblogs, and wikis , 2005 .

[22]  K. Weick Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies , 1990 .

[23]  Patty Hnatiuk,et al.  Culture and Leadership. , 2005 .

[24]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Assimilating Generation Y IT New Hires into USAA's Workforce: The Role of an Enterprise 2.0 System , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[25]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin , 2009, GROUP.

[27]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[29]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Responding to the (almost) unknown: Social representations and corporate policies of social media , 2010, ICIS.

[30]  D. Denyer,et al.  “Social”, “Open” and “Participative”? Exploring Personal Experiences and Organisational Effects of Enterprise2.0 Use , 2011 .

[31]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[33]  Stephen J. Andriole,et al.  Business impact of Web 2.0 technologies , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[34]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[35]  Christoph Scholz,et al.  The Symbolic Value of Computerized Information Systems , 1990 .

[36]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  How Large U.S. Companies Can Use Twitter and Other Social Media to Gain Business Value , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[37]  Drew L. Harris,et al.  Organizational communication satisfaction in the virtual workplace , 2005 .

[38]  Blake Ives,et al.  Harnessing the Power of the Crowds with Corporate Social Networking Tools: How IBM Does It , 2009, MIS Q. Executive.

[39]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[40]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems innovation among organizations , 1994 .

[41]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[42]  John Gallaugher,et al.  Social Media and Customer Dialog Management at Starbucks , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[43]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Rituals in Information System Design , 1984, MIS Q..

[44]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[45]  Penny Candace Deans,et al.  The Impact of Social Media on C-level Roles , 2011, MIS Q. Executive.

[46]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Performing catharsis: The use of online discussion forums in organizational change , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[47]  Bala Iyer,et al.  Innovation Impacts of Using Social Bookmarking Systems , 2011, MIS Q..

[48]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[49]  Eldon Y. Li,et al.  Understanding Web 2.0 service models: A knowledge-creating perspective , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[50]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[51]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Motivations for social networking at work , 2008, CSCW.

[52]  A. Madill,et al.  Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[53]  Tero Ojanpera,et al.  The power of collective intelligence , 2011, 2011 IEEE Technology Time Machine Symposium on Technologies Beyond 2020.

[54]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[55]  Joachim Kimmerle,et al.  Using wikis for organizational learning: functional and psycho‐social principles , 2009 .

[56]  R. Coombs,et al.  Culture, Control and Competition; Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Information Technology in Organizations , 1992 .