The Impact of Analogies on Creative Concept Generation: Lessons From an In Vivo Study in Engineering Design

Research on innovation often highlights analogies from sources outside the current problem domain as a major source of novel concepts; however, the mechanisms underlying this relationship are not well understood. We analyzed the temporal interplay between far analogy use and creative concept generation in a professional design team's brainstorming conversations, investigating the hypothesis that far analogies lead directly to very novel concepts via large steps in conceptual spaces (jumps). Surprisingly, we found that concepts were more similar to their preceding concepts after far analogy use compared to baseline situations (i.e., without far analogy use). Yet far analogies increased the team's concept generation rate compared to baseline conditions. Overall, these results challenge the view that far analogies primarily lead to novel concepts via jumps in conceptual spaces and suggest alternative pathways from far analogies to novel concepts (e.g., iterative, deep exploration within a functional space).

[1]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[2]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An Examination of the Impact of Stimuli Type and GSS Structure on Creativity: Brainstorming Versus Non-Brainstorming Techniques in a GSS Environment , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  D. N. Perkins,et al.  Novel Remote Analogies Seldom Contribute to Discovery , 1983 .

[4]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Visual Analogy—a Strategy for Design Reasoning and Learning , 2001 .

[5]  Lauretta M. Reeves,et al.  The Role of Content and Abstract Information in Analogical Transfer , 1994 .

[6]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies , 2010 .

[8]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Mind in the World: Cognition and Practice in the Invention of the Telephone , 1997 .

[9]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Creativity's camel: The role of analogy in invention. , 1997 .

[11]  V. Goel.  Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Foundations of multidimensional scaling. , 1968, Psychological review.

[13]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Analogical Reasoning and Mental Simulation in Design: Two Strategies Linked to Uncertainty Resolution , 2009 .

[14]  Kamran Baig.  An act of creation , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities , 2009 .

[16]  J. Gero.  Computational Models of Innovative and Creative Design Processes , 2000 .

[17]  S. Parnes.  Effects of extended effort in creative problem solving. , 1961 .

[18]  Vinod Goel,et al.  The Structure of Design Problem Spaces , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[20]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[21]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Putting Blinkers on a Blind Man , 2009 .

[22]  M. Boden.  The creative mind : myths & mechanisms , 1991 .

[23]  T. Poze.  Analogical connections: the essence of creativity , 1983 .

[24]  Jyotsna Vaid,et al.  Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes , 2001 .

[25]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education , 2002 .

[26]  J. Matthews.  The Mind's Best Work , 1985 .

[27]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Inspiration peak: exploring the semantic distance between design problem and textual inspirational stimuli , 2013 .

[28]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  DEFINING AND SUPPORTING DESIGN CREATIVITY , 2006 .

[30]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design , 2008 .

[31]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Picking the right material: Cognitive processing skills and their role in creative thought. , 2003 .

[32]  John Clement,et al.  Observed Methods for Generating Analogies in Scientific Problem Solving , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[33]  M. Ruef,et al.  Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation , 2002 .

[34]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[35]  Colleen Seifert,et al.  Demystification of Cognitive Insight : Opportunistic Assimilation and the Prepared-Mind Perspective , 1995 .

[36]  R. French.  The computational modeling of analogy-making , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[38]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[39]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[40]  John S. Gero,et al.  Using analogy to extend the behaviour state space in creative design , 1999 .

[41]  D. Gentner,et al.  Learning and Transfer: A General Role for Analogical Encoding , 2003 .

[42]  K. Dunbar.  How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. , 1997 .

[43]  Laura J. Kornish,et al.  The Importance of the Raw Idea in Innovation: Testing the Sow's Ear Hypothesis , 2012 .

[44]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  USING ANALOGY TO EXTEND THE BEHAVIOUR STATE SPACE IN DESIGN , 1999 .

[45]  Kenneth J. Kurtz,et al.  Converging on a new role for analogy in problem solving and retrieval: when two problems are better than one , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[46]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Analogies and metaphors in creative design , 2008 .

[47]  R. Spencer.  Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration , 2008 .

[48]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  The Roles of Similarity in Transfer: Separating Retrievability From Inferential Soundness , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  David W. Rosen,et al.  The effects of biological examples in idea generation , 2010 .

[50]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Biomimetic Concept Generation Applied to Design for Remanufacture , 2002 .

[51]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design. , 1997 .

[52]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views , 1994 .

[53]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[54]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[55]  R. Oppenheimer.  Analogy in science. , 1956 .

[56]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Activating Cross-Boundary Knowledge: The Role of Simmelian Ties in the Generation of Innovations , 2010 .

[57]  Ashish Sood,et al.  Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation , 2005 .

[58]  John S. Gero,et al.  Computational models of creative design IV , 1999 .

[59]  Ron Thompson,et al.  Usefulness of the Ideation Principle of Extended Effort in Real World Professional and Managerial Creative Problem Solving , 1986 .

[60]  Ross A. Malaga.  The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[61]  D. Schacter.  The seven sins of memory. Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[62]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[63]  Roger E. Beaty,et al.  Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. , 2012 .

[64]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The role and impact of mental simulation in design , 2009 .

[65]  Benjamin F. Jones.  The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[66]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. , 1997 .

[67]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why we’re so smart , 2003 .

[68]  K. Dunbar.  The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. , 2001 .

[69]  J. Gero,et al.  Mutation and analogy to support creativity in computer-aided design , 2014 .

[70]  D. Gentner,et al.  Advances in Analogy Research: Integration of Theory and Data from the Cognitive, Computational, and Neural Sciences , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[71]  L. Shu,et al.  Investigating effects of oppositely related semantic stimuli on design concept creativity , 2012 .

[72]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas , 2007 .

[73]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[74]  W. Gordon.  Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity , 1961 .

[75]  B. Ross.  This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. , 1987 .

[76]  Michael C. Quick,et al.  Invention and evolution — design in nature and engineering , 1995 .

[77]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  ANALOGICAL REMINDING: A GOOD MATCH IS HARD TO FIND. , 1985 .

[78]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[79]  Robert W. Weisberg,et al.  On “Out-of-the-Box” Thinking in Creativity , 2009 .

[80]  D. Gentner,et al.  Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[81]  Yoon-jung Huh,et al.  Study on Creativity of Game Graphics , 2012 .

[82]  Erik Kaestner,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 2016 .

[83]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler , 1997 .

[84]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Computational models of analogy. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[85]  W. Newstetter,et al.  Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education , 2001 .

[86]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[87]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[88]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Supporting Innovation by Promoting Analogical Reasoning , 2009 .

[89]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Less is more original , 2007 .

[90]  K. Dunbar,et al.  Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[91]  Eric F. Rietzschel,et al.  What are we talking about, when we talk about creativity? Group creativity as a multifaceted, multistage phenomenon , 2009 .

[92]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  "Putting Blinkers on a Blind Man": Providing Cognitive Support for Creative Processes with Environmental Cues , 2009 .

[93]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  A Social-Cognitive Framework of Multidisciplinary Team Innovation , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[94]  K. Dunbar,et al.  How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[95]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  Spontaneous Access and Analogical Incubation Effects , 2005 .

[96]  C. Schunn,et al.  Priming, analogy, and awareness in complex reasoning , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[97]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[98]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. , 1997 .

[99]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Understanding Invention as a Cognitive Process: The Case of Thomas Edison and Early Motion Pictures, 1888-91 , 1990 .

[100]  D. Perkins.  Creativity: Beyond the Darwinian paradigm , 1994 .

[101]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[102]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[103]  Andrew B. Hargadon.  Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation , 2002 .

[104]  Mark T. Keane.  On Retrieving Analogues When Solving Problems , 1987 .

[105]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Reviving Inert Knowledge: Analogical Abstraction Supports Relational Retrieval of Past Events , 2009, Cogn. Sci..