Masticatory features, EMG activity and muscle effort of subjects with different facial patterns.

It has been suggested that craniofacial morphology plays an important role in masticatory function, however, there are controversies and unsolved questions that still require elucidation. The aims of this study were to evaluate masticatory performance, mandibular movement, electromyographic (EMG) activity and muscle effort of masseter and anterior temporal muscles during mastication. Seventy-eight dentate subjects were selected and divided into three groups according to vertical facial pattern: brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial. Silicon-based material was used for chewing tests. Masticatory performance was determined by a 10-sieve method, and masticatory movements during mastication were assessed using a 3D mandibular tracking device. Electromyographic activities of masseter and anterior temporal muscles were evaluated during mastication, and muscle effort was calculated by the percentage of activity required for mastication based on maximum muscle effort. Data were analysed using anova and anova on-ranks tests. Dolichofacial subjects presented significantly poorer masticatory performance (6·64±2·04; 4·33±0·70 and 3·67±0·63), slower rate of chewing (1·34±0·27, 1·18±0·22 and 1·21±0·20 cycles per second) and larger posterior displacement during mastication (6·22±2·18; 5·18±1·87 and 5·13±1·89) than meso- and brachyfacial individuals, respectively. No statistical difference was detected among groups for the other masticatory movement parameters. There was no difference in absolute EMG amplitudes of masseter and anterior temporal muscles during mastication among groups, but the relative effort of both muscles was higher in dolichofacial, followed by meso- and brachyfacial subjects (masseter: 39·34± 2·25; 36·87±4·05 and 33·33±4·15; anterior temporal: 38·12±1·61; 38·20±8·01 and 35·75±2·48). It was concluded that the vertical facial pattern influences masticatory performance, mandibular movement during mastication and the effort masticatory muscles required for chewing.

[1]  F C van Ginkel,et al.  A comparison of human jaw muscle cross-sectional area and volume in long- and short-face subjects, using MRI. , 2008, Archives of oral biology.

[3]  Y. Igarashi,et al.  Association between food mixing ability and mandibular movements during chewing of a wax cube. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[4]  M. Bakke,et al.  Temporomandibular disorders in relation to craniofacial dimensions, head posture and bite force in children selected for orthodontic treatment. , 2001, European journal of orthodontics.

[5]  S. Ogston,et al.  A Test for Occlusal Function , 1987, British journal of orthodontics.

[6]  S. Kiliaridis,et al.  Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children , 2008, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[7]  S. Tecco,et al.  Electromyographic activity of masticatory, neck and trunk muscles of subjects with different mandibular divergence. A cross-sectional evaluation. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  K. Tanne,et al.  Masticatory muscle activity in children and adults with different facial types. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  J. Paphangkorakit,et al.  Determination of chewing efficiency using muscle work. , 2008, Archives of oral biology.

[10]  G. Throckmorton,et al.  Biomechanics of differences in lower facial height. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[11]  T. van Eijden,et al.  Contribution of Jaw Muscle Size and Craniofacial Morphology to Human Bite Force Magnitude , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[12]  R. Dr Orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning for patients with clefts of lip and palate. , 1966 .

[13]  A. van der Bilt,et al.  Comminution of two artificial test foods by dentate and edentulous subjects. , 1992, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[14]  D. O. Tosello,et al.  Electromyographic activity of masseter and temporal muscles with different facial types. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[15]  G. Carlsson,et al.  Relationship of masticatory mandibular movements to masticatory performance of dentate adults: a method study. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[16]  Jeryl D English,et al.  Maximum bite force, muscle efficiency and mechanical advantage in children with vertical growth patterns. , 2003, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  Mauro Farella,et al.  Habitual daily masseter activity of subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology. , 2005, European journal of oral sciences.

[18]  E. G. Mota,et al.  Maximum occlusal force and medial mandibular flexure in relation to vertical facial pattern: a cross-sectional study , 2007, Head & face medicine.

[19]  K. Koyano,et al.  Characteristics of masticatory movement in relation to inclination of occlusal plane. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[20]  Mauro Farella,et al.  Masseter thickness, endurance and exercise-induced pain in subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology. , 2003, European journal of oral sciences.

[21]  J. Abbink,et al.  Oral physiology and mastication , 2006, Physiology & Behavior.

[22]  E. Tanaka,et al.  Correlation between maximum bite force and craniofacial morphology of young adults in Indonesia. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.