Using molecular dynamics to map interaction networks in an aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetase

Long‐range functional communication is a hallmark of many enzymes that display allostery, or action‐at‐a‐distance. Many aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases can be considered allosteric, in that their trinucleotide anticodons bind the enzyme at a site removed from their catalytic domains. Such is the case with E. coli methionyl‐tRNA synthase (MetRS), which recognizes its cognate anticodon using a conserved tryptophan residue 50 Å away from the site of tRNA aminoacylation. The lack of details regarding how MetRS and tRNAMet interact has limited efforts to deconvolute the long‐range communication that occurs in this system. We have used molecular dynamics simulations to evaluate the mobility of wild‐type MetRS and a Trp‐461 variant shown previously by experiment to be deficient in tRNA aminoacylation. The simulations reveal that MetRS has significant mobility, particularly at structural motifs known to be involved in catalysis. Correlated motions are observed between residues in distant structural motifs, including the active site, zinc binding motif, and anticodon binding domain. Both mobility and correlated motions decrease significantly but not uniformly upon substitution at Trp‐461. Mobility of some residues is essentially abolished upon removal of Trp‐461, despite being tens of Ångstroms away from the site of mutation and solvent exposed. This conserved residue does not simply participate in anticodon binding, as demonstrated experimentally, but appears to mediate the protein's distribution of structural ensembles. Finally, simulations of MetRS indicate that the ligand‐free protein samples conformations similar to those observed in crystal structures with substrates and substrate analogs bound. Thus, there are low energetic barriers for MetRS to achieve the substrate‐bound conformations previously determined by structural methods. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Modeling zinc sulfhydryl bonds in zinc fingers , 2001 .

[2]  H. Inokuchi,et al.  Functional communication in the recognition of tRNA by Escherichia coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  T. Webster,et al.  Specific sequence homology and three-dimensional structure of an aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase. , 1984, Science.

[4]  T. Steitz,et al.  Insights into editing from an ile-tRNA synthetase structure with tRNAile and mupirocin. , 1999, Science.

[5]  D. Söll,et al.  Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis. , 2000, Annual review of biochemistry.

[6]  L. H. Schulman,et al.  Two separate peptides in Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase form the anticodon binding site for methionine tRNA. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[7]  L. Kelley,et al.  An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[8]  Y. Mechulam,et al.  Binding of the anticodon domain of tRNA(fMet) to Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Michael G. Rossmann,et al.  Chemical and biological evolution of a nucleotide-binding protein , 1974, Nature.

[10]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[11]  Shigeyuki Yokoyama,et al.  Structural snapshots of the KMSKS loop rearrangement for amino acid activation by bacterial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  R. Ranganathan,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. , 1999, Science.

[13]  G. Eriani,et al.  L‐Arginine recognition by yeast arginyl‐tRNA synthetase , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[14]  S. Cusack,et al.  A second class of synthetase structure revealed by X-ray analysis of Escherichia coli seryl-tRNA synthetase at 2.5 Å , 1990, Nature.

[15]  C. Carter,et al.  Computational studies of tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase: activation of ATP by induced-fit. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  O. Nureki,et al.  Crystal structure of Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase highlights species-specific features. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Y. Mechulam,et al.  Methionyl-tRNA synthetase needs an intact and mobile 332KMSKS336 motif in catalysis of methionyl adenylate formation. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  A. Lesk,et al.  Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[19]  Douglas L. Brutlag,et al.  FoldMiner and LOCK 2: protein structure comparison and motif discovery on the web , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  D. Fourmy,et al.  Methionyl-tRNA synthetase zinc binding domain. Three-dimensional structure and homology with rubredoxin and gag retroviral proteins. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Shigeyuki Yokoyama,et al.  ATP binding by glutamyl‐tRNA synthetase is switched to the productive mode by tRNA binding , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[22]  P. Schimmel,et al.  A mechanism for reducing entropic cost of induced fit in protein--RNA recognition. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[23]  S. Martinis,et al.  Enzymatic aminoacylation of sequence-specific RNA minihelices and hybrid duplexes with methionine. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Sharon Hammes-Schiffer,et al.  Impact of distal mutations on the network of coupled motions correlated to hydride transfer in dihydrofolate reductase. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Q. Cui,et al.  Reconciling the “old” and “new” views of protein allostery: A molecular simulation study of chemotaxis Y protein (CheY) , 2006, Proteins.

[26]  M. Mirande,et al.  The tRNA-dependent activation of arginine by arginyl-tRNA synthetase requires inter-domain communication. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  Laxmikant V. Kale,et al.  NAMD2: Greater Scalability for Parallel Molecular Dynamics , 1999 .

[28]  S. Blanquet,et al.  The mechanism of action of methionyl-tRNA synthetase from Escherichia coli. 1. Fluorescence studies on tRNAMet binding as a function of ligands, ions and pH. , 1973, European journal of biochemistry.

[29]  Y. Mechulam,et al.  Selection of suppressor methionyl-tRNA synthetases: mapping the tRNA anticodon binding site. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  A. Joshua Wand,et al.  Dynamic activation of protein function: A view emerging from NMR spectroscopy , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[31]  L. H. Schulman,et al.  Anticodon switching changes the identity of methionine and valine transfer RNAs. , 1988, Science.

[32]  J. Risler,et al.  How methionyl-tRNA synthetase creates its amino acid recognition pocket upon L-methionine binding. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Y. Mechulam,et al.  Transition state stabilization by the 'high' motif of class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: the case of Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  R. Starzyk,et al.  Insertion of new sequences into the catalytic domain of an enzyme. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[35]  Joelle N Pelletier,et al.  Protein motions promote catalysis. , 2004, Chemistry & biology.

[36]  L. H. Schulman,et al.  Arginine-395 is required for efficient in vivo and in vitro aminoacylation of tRNAs by Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[37]  L. H. Schulman,et al.  Identification of the tRNA anticodon recognition site of Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[38]  P. Schimmel,et al.  Domain-domain communication in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. , 2001, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[39]  O. Nureki,et al.  Chemical modification and mutagenesis studies on zinc binding of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  J. Barciszewski,et al.  Methionyl-tRNA synthetase. , 2001, Acta biochimica Polonica.

[41]  D E Koshland,et al.  Propagating conformational changes over long (and short) distances in proteins , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  J. Williamson Induced fit in RNA–protein recognition , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[43]  Joanne I. Yeh,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of the ligand-binding domain of a wild-type bacterial chemotaxis receptor. Structural comparison to the cross-linked mutant forms and conformational changes upon ligand binding. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[44]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[45]  D. Kern,et al.  The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[46]  C. Carter,et al.  2.9 Å crystal structure of ligand‐free tryptophanyl‐tRNA synthetase: Domain movements fragment the adenine nucleotide binding site , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[47]  R. Sharon,et al.  Accurate simulation of protein dynamics in solution. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[49]  Y. Mechulam,et al.  Mapping of the zinc binding domain of Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  Carol Beth Post,et al.  Insights into Protein Compressibility from Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2001 .

[51]  Peter L. Freddolino,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the complete satellite tobacco mosaic virus. , 2006, Structure.

[52]  J. Perona,et al.  Long-range intramolecular signaling in a tRNA synthetase complex revealed by pre-steady-state kinetics. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  P. Schimmel,et al.  Activation of microhelix charging by localized helix destabilization. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  P. Sampson,et al.  Use of analogues of methionine and methionyl adenylate to sample conformational changes during catalysis in Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  J. Perona,et al.  tRNA-dependent active site assembly in a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. , 2003, Structure.

[56]  D E Koshland,et al.  A piston model for transmembrane signaling of the aspartate receptor. , 1999, Science.

[57]  Shigeyuki Yokoyama,et al.  Structural basis for anticodon recognition by discriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[58]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[59]  H. Berendsen,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR MACROMOLECULAR DYNAMICS AND CONSTRAINT DYNAMICS , 1977 .

[60]  L. H. Schulman,et al.  Activation of methionine by Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[61]  S. Martinis,et al.  Microhelix aminoacylation by a class I tRNA synthetase. Non-conserved base pairs required for specificity. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[62]  Olivier Poch,et al.  Partition of tRNA synthetases into two classes based on mutually exclusive sets of sequence motifs , 1990, Nature.

[63]  O. Nureki,et al.  Structural basis for anticodon recognition by methionyl-tRNA synthetase , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[64]  Molecular Dynamics Simulations Show That Bound Mg2+ Contributes to Amino Acid and Aminoacyl Adenylate Binding Specificity in Aspartyl-tRNA Synthetase through Long Range Electrostatic Interactions* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[65]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[66]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  A Survey of Recent Advances in Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms , 1983, Comput. J..

[67]  D. Moras,et al.  Structural and functional considerations of the aminoacylation reaction. , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[68]  Y. Mechulam,et al.  Lysine 335, part of the KMSKS signature sequence, plays a crucial role in the amino acid activation catalysed by the methionyl-tRNA synthetase from Escherichia coli. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[69]  R Giegé,et al.  The 2.0 A crystal structure of Thermus thermophilus methionyl-tRNA synthetase reveals two RNA-binding modules. , 2000, Structure.

[70]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[71]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? , 2004, Proteins.

[72]  S Cusack,et al.  The 2 Å crystal structure of leucyl‐tRNA synthetase and its complex with a leucyl‐adenylate analogue , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[73]  S. Blanquet,et al.  The amino acid activation reaction catalyzed by methionyl-transfer rna synthetase: evidence for synergistic coupling between the sites for methionine adenosine and pyrophosphate. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  Angelo Carotti,et al.  Three‐dimensional model of the human aromatase enzyme and density functional parameterization of the iron‐containing protoporphyrin IX for a molecular dynamics study of heme‐cysteinato cytochromes , 2006, Proteins.

[75]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[76]  S. Cusack,et al.  Class I tyrosyl‐tRNA synthetase has a class II mode of cognate tRNA recognition , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[77]  T. Simonson,et al.  Free‐Energy Simulations and Experiments Reveal Long‐Range Electrostatic Interactions and Substrate‐Assisted Specificity in an Aminoacyl‐tRNA Synthetase , 2006, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[78]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  W F van Gunsteren,et al.  A molecular dynamics study of the C-terminal fragment of the L7/L12 ribosomal protein. Secondary structure motion in a 150 picosecond trajectory. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[80]  L. H. Schulman,et al.  tRNA recognition site of Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[81]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[82]  P. Dessen,et al.  Sequence similarities among the family of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. , 1986, Biochimie.

[83]  J. Risler,et al.  Crystallographic study at 2.5 A resolution of the interaction of methionyl-tRNA synthetase from Escherichia coli with ATP. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[84]  Stacy T. Knutson,et al.  Mutations in α‐helical solvent‐exposed sites of eglin c have long‐range effects: Evidence from molecular dynamics simulations , 2005 .

[85]  R. Starzyk,et al.  Evidence for dispensable sequences inserted into a nucleotide fold. , 1987, Science.

[86]  Y. Mechulam,et al.  Crucial role of an idiosyncratic insertion in the Rossman fold of class 1 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: the case of methionyl-tRNA synthetase. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[87]  B. Mikami,et al.  Domain closure mechanism in transferrins: new viewpoints about the hinge structure and motion as deduced from high resolution crystal structures of ovotransferrin N-lobe. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[88]  S. Kearsley On the orthogonal transformation used for structural comparisons , 1989 .

[89]  Dino Moras,et al.  tRNA aminoacylation by arginyl‐tRNA synthetase: induced conformations during substrates binding , 2000, The EMBO journal.