Adaptation of the European Commission-recommended user testing method to patient medication information leaflets in Japan

Background The safe use of drugs relies on providing accurate drug information to patients. In Japan, patient leaflets called Drug Guide for Patients are officially available; however, their utility has never been verified. This is the first attempt to improve Drug Guide for Patients via user testing in Japan. Purpose To test and improve communication of drug information to minimize risk for patients via user testing of the current and revised versions of Drug Guide for Patients, and to demonstrate that this method is effective for improving Drug Guide for Patients in Japan. Method We prepared current and revised versions of the Drug Guide for Patients and performed user testing via semi-structured interviews with consumers to compare these versions for two guides for Mercazole and Strattera. We evenly divided 54 participants into two groups with similar distributions of sex, age, and literacy level to test the differing versions of the Mercazole guide. Another group of 30 participants were divided evenly to test the versions of the Strattera guide. After completing user testing, the participants evaluated both guides in terms of amount of information, readability, usefulness of information, and layout and appearance. Participants were also asked for their opinions on the leaflets. Results Response rates were 100% for both Mercazole and Strattera. The revised versions of both Guides were superior or equal to the current versions in terms of accessibility and understandability. The revised version of the Mercazole guide showed better ratings for readability, usefulness of information, and layout (p<0.01) than did the current version, while that for Strattera showed superior readability and layout (p<0.01). Conclusion User testing was effective for evaluating the utility of Drug Guide for Patients. Additionally, the revised version had superior accessibility and understandability.

[1]  Lauren McCormack,et al.  Consumer Understanding, Preferences, and Responses to Different Versions of Drug Safety Messages in the United States: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Drug Safety.

[2]  Michiko Yamamoto,et al.  [Drug information for patients (Package Leaflets), and user testing in EU]. , 2015, Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan.

[3]  P. Aslani,et al.  The design and user-testing of a question prompt list for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder , 2014, BMJ Open.

[4]  P. Knapp,et al.  Can user testing of a clinical trial patient information sheet make it fit-for-purpose? - a randomized controlled trial , 2011, BMC medicine.

[5]  Peter Knapp,et al.  "User-testing" as a method for testing the fitness-for-purpose of written medicine information. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[6]  D. Raynor,et al.  Key Principles to Guide Development of Consumer Medicine Information—Content Analysis of Information Design Texts , 2009, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[7]  Peter Knapp,et al.  The role and value of written information for patients about individual medicines: a systematic review , 2007, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[8]  Joerg Fuchs,et al.  Inappropriate dosage instructions in package inserts. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[9]  P. Aslani,et al.  Consumer opinions on medicines information and factors affecting its use — an Australian experience , 2002 .

[10]  A. Fujimura,et al.  Benefits of Providing Information about Drug Therapy to Patients , 1995 .