Learner control and personal learning environment: a challenge for instructional design

In an increasingly networked and technologically mediated world, people need to continuously update their knowledge and skill base, so as to be able to self-direct their intentional learning projects. In addition to teaching domain-specific knowledge and skills, the role of higher education should be reorganizing current teaching and studying practices in a way that allows students to take control over their projects and environments. Contemporary models of instructional design consider a learning environment as a predefined element in instruction created and controlled by an educational authority. On the other hand an emerging personal learning environment (PLE) discourse emphasizes learner control over an environment. However, current interpretations of PLEs leave other instructional functions unattended. The article proposes an elaborated understanding of PLE, one which integrates important instructional functions of learner control. The theoretical framework presented in this article is inspired by conceptual ideas developed within the iCamp ( www.icamp.eu) project. The article illustrates the line of argumentation with students experiences gathered from a pilot course taught at Tallinn University, Estonia.

[1]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Instructional Design and Development of Learning Communities: An Invitation to a Dialogue. , 1995 .

[2]  Edilson Arenas,et al.  Personal learning environments implications and challenges , 2008 .

[3]  Fridolin Wild,et al.  Designing for Change: Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments , 2008 .

[4]  C. McLoughlin,et al.  Who is in Control? Defining Interactive Learning Environments , 2022 .

[5]  Graham Attwell,et al.  Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? , 2007 .

[6]  Arvid Staupe,et al.  The PLExus Prototype: A PLE realized as Topic Maps , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007).

[7]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  The Personal Learning Environment and the human condition: from theory to teaching practice , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[8]  Philip C. Candy,et al.  Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[9]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the Dominant Design of Educational Systems , 2006, EC-TEL Workshops.

[10]  Andrew S. Gibbons,et al.  Coming at Design from a Different Angle: Functional Design , 2009 .

[11]  Mark van Harmelen,et al.  Personal Learning Environments , 2006, ICALT.

[12]  Patrick Alan Danaher,et al.  Lifelong learning : reflecting on successes and framing futures : keynote and refereed papers from the 5th International Lifelong Learning Conference, Yeppoon, Central Queensland, Australia, 16 - 19 June 2008 , 2008 .

[13]  Carol E. Kasworm,et al.  The Development of Adult Learner Autonomy and Self-Directedness in Distance Education. , 1992 .

[14]  S. Slater,et al.  Learning to change , 1995 .

[15]  M. Kringelbach.  Learning to Change , 2004, PLoS biology.

[16]  Kai Pata,et al.  Distributed Learning Environments and Social Software: In Search for a Framework of Design , 2009 .

[17]  Ralph G. Brockett,et al.  Self-Direction in Adult Learning , 1991 .

[18]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  What Is Instructional-Design Theory and How Is It Changing? , 1999 .

[19]  M. Kerres.  Microlearning as a challenge for instructional desi gn , 2006 .

[20]  Scott Wilson,et al.  Towards a reference model for the personal learning environment , 2006 .

[21]  D. Brien,et al.  The Australian postgraduate writing network developing a collaborative learning environment for higher degree students and their supervisors , 2008 .

[22]  Jason Huett,et al.  Learning and Instructional Technologies for the 21st Century , 2009 .

[23]  D. Jonassen.  Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? , 1991 .