Development of a Movement Quality Measurement Tool for Children

Background Pediatric physical therapists assess the quantity and quality of children's motor skills. Several quantitative motor tests are currently available, but a concise measurement tool of observable movement quality (OMQ) is lacking. Objective The purpose of this study was to develop an OMQ measurement tool for children from the perspective of pediatric physical therapists. Design A qualitative, 3-phase study involving pediatric physical therapists was conducted. Methods The first phase consisted of 7 semistructured interviews. The second phase comprised a structured meeting using a nominal group technique, with the interviewees required to identify the most relevant OMQ aspects. The third phase comprised a Delphi technique involving 61 pediatric physical therapy experts with the aim of achieving at least 80% agreement on relevance, terminology, and definitions of OMQ aspects. Results Across all 3 phases, 32 aspects based on different theoretical constructs were considered. Fifteen aspects were included in the measurement. The pediatric physical therapy experts achieved at least 80% agreement on the definitions of 14 OMQ aspects: automated movements, asymmetry in movements, variation in movements, appropriate gross motor movements, fluency of movements, reduced muscle tone, increased muscle tone, involuntary movements, accuracy, slow/delayed movements, accelerated/abrupt movements, tremors, strength regulation, and stereotyped movements. The definition of appropriate fine motor movements achieved 75% agreement. This aspect was included because gross and fine motor movements are complementary. The aspects were scored using a 5-point Likert scale, with a total score ranging from 15 to 75 and with a higher score indicating a better OMQ. Conclusion The OMQ scale, a concise measurement tool with 15 defined aspects, was developed. Content validity was obtained, but before the OMQ scale can be used in clinical practice, studies on reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness are needed.

[1]  E. Hemgren,et al.  Quality of motor performance in preterm and full-term 3-year-old children. , 2004, Child: care, health and development.

[2]  L. Molinari,et al.  Neuromotor development from 5 to 18 years. Part 2: associated movements. , 2001, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[3]  E. Hemgren,et al.  Deficits in motor co-ordination and attention at 3 years of age predict motor deviations in 6.5-year-old children who needed neonatal intensive care. , 2009, Child: care, health and development.

[4]  S. Gordon,et al.  The Nominal Group Technique: A useful concensus methodology in physiotherapy research , 2004 .

[5]  S. Campbell,et al.  Construct validity of the test of infant motor performance. , 1995, Physical therapy.

[6]  Andrew K. Brown,et al.  Recommendations for musculoskeletal ultrasonography by rheumatologists: setting global standards for best practice by expert consensus. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  A. Bos,et al.  Quality of general movements in preterm infants with transient periventricular echodensities , 1998, Acta paediatrica.

[8]  R. Oostendorp,et al.  A model to predict motor performance in preterm infants at 5 years. , 2009, Early human development.

[9]  J. Jolles,et al.  Quality of movement as predictor of ADHD: results from a prospective population study in 5‐ and 6‐year‐old children , 2002, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[10]  J. Richards,et al.  Agreement between physiotherapists on quality of movement rated via videotape , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[11]  M. D. de Villiers,et al.  The Delphi technique in health sciences education research , 2005, Medical teacher.

[12]  Theresa M. Holmgren,et al.  Supervised strengthening exercises versus home-based movement exercises after arthroscopic acromioplasty: a randomized clinical trial. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  Mijna Hadders-Algra,et al.  Variation and Variability: Key Words in Human Motor Development , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[14]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Motor Learning and Performance , 1991 .

[15]  B. Hopkins,et al.  A method to assess the development of muscle power in preterms after term age. , 1992, Neuropediatrics.

[16]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[17]  Donna J. Cech,et al.  Functional movement development : across the life span , 1995 .

[18]  G. Gard,et al.  An eye for movement quality: A phenomenological study of movement quality reflecting a group of physiotherapists' understanding of the phenomenon , 2008, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[19]  Chien-Hui Lin,et al.  Development and initial validation of the Preschooler Gross Motor Quality Scale. , 2010, Research in developmental disabilities.

[20]  B. Strömberg,et al.  Structured observation of motor performance (SOMP-I) applied to preterm and full term infants who needed neonatal intensive care. A cross-sectional analysis of progress and quality of motor performance at ages 0-10 months. , 1995, Early human development.

[21]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Development of a quality-of-movement measure for children with cerebral palsy. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[22]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Task goals and change in dynamical degrees of freedom with motor learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  A. Cieza,et al.  Identification of relevant ICF categories in patients with chronic health conditions: a Delphi exercise. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[24]  Mijna Hadders-Algra,et al.  Evaluation of Neuromotor Function in Infancy–A Systematic Review of Available Methods , 2008, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[25]  B. Rösblad,et al.  The qualitative motor observations in Movement ABC: Aspects of reliability and validity , 2009 .

[26]  B. Strömberg,et al.  Structured observation of motor performance (SOMP-I) applied to neonatally healthy fullterm infants at the ages of 0-10 months. , 1995, Early human development.

[27]  J. Piek The role of variability in early motor development , 2002 .

[28]  Stephen Langendorfer,et al.  Test of Gross Motor Development , 1986 .

[29]  C. Heriza,et al.  Measuring Infant Movement , 1987 .

[30]  Joshua Freeman,et al.  Using a modified nominal group technique as a curriculum evaluation tool. , 2004, Family medicine.

[31]  Reliability and validity of a qualitative and quantitative motor test for 5- to 6-year-old children. , 2004, European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society.

[32]  J. Darrah,et al.  Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). , 1992, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[33]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice , 2006 .

[34]  George Wright,et al.  Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory , 1991 .

[35]  Measuring infant movement. Clinical and technological assessment techniques. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[36]  G Cioni,et al.  Early neurological signs in preterm infants with unilateral intraparenchymal echodensity. , 2000, Neuropediatrics.

[37]  R. Dole,et al.  Consensus Among Experts in Pediatric Occupational and Physical Therapy on Elements of Individualized Education Programs , 2003, Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.

[38]  D. Gorga,et al.  TRENDS IN NEUROMOTOR BEHAVIOR OF PRETERM AND FULLTERM INFANTS IN THE FIRST YEAR OF LIFE: A PRELIMINARY REPORT , 1985, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[39]  S. Burge,et al.  Defining the dermatological content of the undergraduate medical curriculum: a modified Delphi study , 2006, The British journal of dermatology.

[40]  S. Gordon,et al.  The difficult patient in private practice physiotherapy: a qualitative study. , 2003, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[41]  K. Malterud Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[42]  H. Prechtl,et al.  State of the art of a new functional assessment of the young nervous system. An early predictor of cerebral palsy. , 1997, Early human development.

[43]  O. Kraus de Camargo,et al.  Video-based documentation and rating system of the motor behaviour of handicapped children treated with physiotherapy--a new outcome measure. , 1998, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[44]  Adri Hartveld MSc Mcsp Qualitative Analysis of Human Movement , 1998 .

[45]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[46]  L. DeStefano Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency , 2008 .

[47]  W. Nagler,et al.  Neuromotor development of preterm and full-term infants. , 1988, Early human development.

[48]  S. Campbell Pediatric neurologic physical therapy , 1991 .

[49]  Giovanni Cioni,et al.  An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions , 1997, The Lancet.

[50]  Mijna Hadders-Algra,et al.  Construct validity of the Infant Motor Profile: relation with prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal risk factors , 2010, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[51]  D Russell,et al.  Gross motor performance measure for children with cerebral palsy: study design and preliminary findings. , 1992, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[52]  E. Hemgren,et al.  A model for combined assessment of motor performance and behaviour in 3-year-old children. , 1999, Upsala journal of medical sciences.

[53]  B. Glaser Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Vs. Forcing , 1992 .

[54]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[55]  B. Vereijken The Complexity of Childhood Development: Variability in Perspective , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[56]  M Ryan,et al.  Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[57]  R. Garland The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is it Desirable? , 1991 .

[58]  Y. R. Burns,et al.  The Neuro-sensory Motor Developmental Assessment Part 1: Development and Administration of the Test. , 1989, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[59]  R. Brook,et al.  Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[60]  B. Touwen Examination of the child with minor neurological dysfunction , 1979 .

[61]  F. Hasson,et al.  Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[62]  L Molinari,et al.  Neuromotor development from 5 to 18 years. Part 1: timed performance. , 2001, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[63]  B. Dan,et al.  A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006 , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology. Supplement.

[64]  N. Bayley Bayley Scales of Infant Development , 1999 .

[65]  W. Fetter,et al.  Muscle power development during the first year of life predicts neuromotor behaviour at 7 years in preterm born high-risk infants. , 2002, Early human development.

[66]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  The Gross Motor Performance Measure: Validity and Responsiveness of a Measure of Quality of Movement , 1995, Physical therapy.

[67]  C. Powell The Delphi technique: myths and realities. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[68]  A. Bouma,et al.  The quality of preterm infants' spontaneous movements: an early indicator of intelligence and behaviour at school age. , 2009, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[69]  C M Goodman,et al.  The Delphi technique: a critique. , 1987, Journal of advanced nursing.

[70]  L. B. Harman,et al.  Factors That Influence the Clinical Decision Making of Novice and Experienced Physical Therapists , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[71]  M. Hadders‐Algra,et al.  The Infant Motor Profile: a standardized and qualitative method to assess motor behaviour in infancy , 2008, Developmental medicine and child neurology.