Item frequency in probe-recognition memory search: Converging evidence for a role of item-response learning

In short-term probe-recognition tasks, observers make speeded old–new recognition judgments for items that are members of short lists. However, long-term memory (LTM) for items from previous lists influences current-list performance. The current experiment pursued the nature of these long-term influences—in particular, whether they emerged from item-familiarity or item-response-learning mechanisms. Subjects engaged in varied-mapping (VM) and consistent-mapping (CM) short-term probe-recognition tasks (e.g., Schneider & Shiffrin, Psychological Review, 84, 1–66, 1977). The key manipulation was to vary the frequency with which individual items were presented across trials. We observed a striking dissociation: Whereas increased presentation frequency led to benefits in performance for both old and new test probes in CM search, it resulted in interference effects for both old and new test probes in VM search. Formal modeling suggested that a form of item-response learning took place in both conditions: Each presentation of a test probe led to the storage of that test probe—along with its associated “old” or “new” response—as an exemplar in LTM. These item-response pairs were retrieved along with current-list items in driving observers’ old-– recognition judgments. We conclude that item-response learning is a core component of the LTM mechanisms that influence CM and VM memory search.

[1]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Strategies and automaticity. I: Basic findings and conceptual framework , 1994 .

[2]  S. Sternberg.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 1966, Science.

[3]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[4]  Gregory E. Cox,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition An Exemplar-Familiarity Model Predicts Short-Term and Long-Term Probe Recognition Across Diverse Forms of Memory Search , 2014 .

[5]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[6]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[7]  Marc W. Howard,et al.  A distributed representation of temporal context , 2002 .

[8]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the Form of Forgetting , 1991 .

[9]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[10]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  An Exemplar-Retrieval Model of Short-term Memory Search , 2016 .

[11]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  In Defence of High-Speed Memory Scanning , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Corbin A. Cunningham,et al.  You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Familiarity and categorization processes in memory search , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. , 2011, Psychological review.

[16]  G. Logan.  Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  The structure of short-term memory scanning: an investigation using response time distribution models , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[18]  Chris Donkin,et al.  A Power-Law Model of Psychological Memory Strength in Short- and Long-Term Recognition , 2012, Psychological science.

[19]  Robert M Nosofsky,et al.  Speeded classification in a probabilistic category structure: contrasting exemplar-retrieval, decision-boundary, and prototype models. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Mechanisms of performance improvement in consistent mapping memory search automaticity or strategy shift , 1991 .

[21]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[22]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Degree of consistent training: Improvements in search performance and automatic process development , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[24]  S. Monsell.  Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[26]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .