Next-generation tools for evolutionary invasion analyses

Evolutionary invasion analysis is a powerful technique for modelling in evolutionary biology. The general approach is to derive an expression for the growth rate of a mutant allele encoding some novel phenotype, and then to use this expression to predict long-term evolutionary outcomes. Mathematically, such ‘invasion fitness’ expressions are most often derived using standard linear stability analyses from dynamical systems theory. Interestingly, there is a mathematically equivalent approach to such stability analyses that is often employed in mathematical epidemiology, and that is based on so-called ‘next-generation’ matrices. Although this next-generation matrix approach has sometimes also been used in evolutionary invasion analyses, it is not yet common in this area despite the fact that it can sometimes greatly simplify calculations. The aim of this article is to bring the approach to a wider evolutionary audience in two ways. First, we review the next-generation matrix approach and provide a novel, and easily intuited, interpretation of how this approach relates to more standard techniques. Second, we illustrate next-generation methods in evolutionary invasion analysis through a series of informative examples. Although focusing primarily on evolutionary invasion analysis, we provide several insights that apply to biological modelling in general.

[1]  Steven A. Frank,et al.  Models of Parasite Virulence , 1996, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[2]  M Gyllenberg,et al.  On fitness in structured metapopulations , 2001, Journal of mathematical biology.

[3]  Troy Day,et al.  A Biologist's Guide to Mathematical Modeling in Ecology and Evolution , 2007 .

[4]  J. S. GALE,et al.  Logic of animal conflict , 1975, Nature.

[5]  J. Watmough,et al.  Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[6]  On Net Reproductive Rate and the Timing of Reproductive Output , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[7]  L. Wahl,et al.  Perspectives on the basic reproductive ratio , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  S. Otto,et al.  Chapter 12: Evolutionary Invasion Analysis , 2007 .

[10]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[11]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  On evolutionarily stable life histories, optimization and the need to be specific about density dependence , 1995 .

[12]  N. Stenseth,et al.  On evolutionarily stable strategies , 1984 .

[13]  I. Eshel Evolutionary and continuous stability , 1983 .

[14]  U. Dieckmann The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution , 1996 .

[15]  Klaus Dietz,et al.  The concept of RO in epidemic theory , 1996 .

[16]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[17]  J. Metz,et al.  The enigma of frequency-dependent selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  A. Nold Heterogeneity in disease-transmission modeling , 1980 .

[19]  O. Diekmann,et al.  On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations , 1990, Journal of mathematical biology.

[20]  D. E. Matthews Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[21]  R M May,et al.  Coevolution of hosts and parasites , 1982, Parasitology.

[22]  P. Driessche,et al.  A graph-theoretic method for the basic reproduction number in continuous time epidemiological models , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[23]  P. Abrams,et al.  Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits , 1993, Evolutionary Ecology.

[24]  Peter D. Taylor,et al.  Evolutionary stability in one-parameter models under weak selection , 1989 .

[25]  Abrams Modelling the adaptive dynamics of traits involved in inter‐ and intraspecific interactions: An assessment of three methods , 2001 .

[26]  W. Hamilton Extraordinary Sex Ratios , 1967 .

[27]  Barbara Boldin,et al.  Introducing a Population into a Steady Community: The Critical Case, the Center Manifold, and the Direction of Bifurcation , 2006, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[28]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Mathematical models in biology , 2005, Classics in applied mathematics.

[29]  G A Parker,et al.  Evolutionary Stable Strategies , 1984, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[30]  N. Mideo,et al.  Virulence evolution and the trade‐off hypothesis: history, current state of affairs and the future , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[31]  E. Seneta Non-negative matrices;: An introduction to theory and applications , 1973 .

[32]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[33]  M. Baalen Coevolution of recovery ability and virulence , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.