Primary investigation to leveraging effect of using ethanol fuel on reducing gasoline fuel consumption

Abstract Ethanol has been used as an alternative fuel or fuel addicts in spark ignition (SI) engines for years. However, the existing methods of using ethanol fuel, such as blending gasoline and ethanol, pure ethanol and by-fuel of ethanol or gasoline do not make the best use of ethanol’s potentials in improving engine performance. Compared with gasoline fuel, ethanol fuel possesses greater octane number and latent heat of vaporization, which allow higher compression ratio and consequently lead to the increased thermal efficiency. Ethanol fuel’s higher combustion velocity could also help increase the combustion efficiency and minimize the energy loss. This paper reports our preliminary investigation to the leveraging effect of using ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on reducing the consumption of gasoline fuel. Experiments were conducted on a YBR250 engine which was a single cylinder SI engine modified to be equipped with EDI + GPI. At each of the four designated engine speeds, the engine load was set to be either medium or light and the ethanol/gasoline energy ratio (EER) was varied from 0% to 60.1%. The rate of the total heating energy of two fuels was kept constant in one of the two engine load conditions. Experimental results were analyzed and discussed in terms of engine performance, in-cylinder combustion characteristics and engine emissions. They showed certain leveraging effect of using ethanol fuel by the increased BMEP, volumetric efficiency and thermal efficiency and reduced NO with the increase of EER.

[1]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Effects of Combustion Phasing, Relative Air-fuel Ratio, Compression Ratio, and Load on SI Engine Efficiency , 2006 .

[2]  G. Zhu,et al.  Combustion characteristics of a single-cylinder spark ignition gasoline and ethanol dual-fuelled engine , 2010 .

[3]  Chang-Gi Kim,et al.  Performance and exhaust emission characteristics of a spark ignition engine using ethanol and ethanol-reformed gas , 2010 .

[4]  Jim S. Cowart,et al.  An Experimental and Modeling Investigation into the Comparative Knock and Performance Characteristics of E85, Gasohol [E10] and Regular Unleaded Gasoline [87 (R+M)/2] , 2007 .

[5]  Jeffrey Naber,et al.  Combustion and Emissions Characterization of Soy Methyl Ester Biodiesel Blends in an Automotive Turbocharged Diesel Engine , 2009 .

[6]  Wayne Moore,et al.  Investigation of Knock Limited Compression Ratio of Ethanol Gasoline Blends , 2010 .

[7]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Calculations Of Knock Suppression in Highly Turbocharged Gasoline/Ethanol Engines Using Direct Ethanol Injection , 2006 .

[8]  L. Bromberg,et al.  Direct Injection Ethanol Boosted Gasoline Engines: Biofuel Leveraging For Cost Effective Reduction of Oil Dependence and CO2 Emissions , 2005 .

[9]  Guohong Tian,et al.  Effect of spark timing and load on a DISI engine fuelled with 2,5-dimethylfuran , 2011 .

[10]  Guohong Tian,et al.  Dual-injection: The flexible, bi-fuel concept for spark-ignition engines fuelled with various gasoline and biofuel blends , 2011 .

[11]  Hongming Xu,et al.  Laminar Burning Velocities of 2,5-Dimethylfuran Compared with Ethanol and Gasoline , 2010 .

[12]  Hongming Xu,et al.  Combustion performance of bio-ethanol at various blend ratios in a gasoline direct injection engine , 2011 .

[13]  Yukihiro Tsukasaki,et al.  Feasibility Study of Ethanol Applications to A Direct Injection Gasoline Engine , 2007 .

[14]  A. Ota,et al.  The Effect of Ethanol Fuel on a Spark Ignition Engine , 2006 .

[15]  Robert Albert Stein,et al.  Optimal Use of E85 in a Turbocharged Direct Injection Engine , 2009 .