Iterative blind deconvolution in magnetic resonance brain perfusion imaging

In first pass magnetic resonance brain perfusion imaging, arterial input functions are used in the deconvolution of the observed contrast concentrations to obtain quantitative hemodynamic parameters. Ideally, arterial input functions should be measured in each imaged voxel to eliminate the effects of delay and dispersion of the contrast agent from the injection site. An approach based on iterative blind deconvolution with the Richardson–Lucy algorithm is proposed for the simultaneous estimation of voxel‐specific arterial input functions and voxel‐specific tissue residue functions. An extended contrast concentration model was used to separate the first pass bolus from additional recirculation and leakage signals. The extended model was evaluated using in vivo data. Computer simulations examined the feasibility of iterative blind deconvolution in perfusion imaging. Preliminary in vivo results from a patient with fibromuscular dysplasia showed territories with delayed/dispersed arterial input functions that coincided with the location of territories supplied by collateral circulation as described from the complete radiologic examination. Higher flow values and shorter mean transit times compared to conventional methods were obtained in these areas, suggesting that the effects of dispersion were minimized. The in vivo estimated arterial input functions visualized the patient's blood supply patterns as a function of time. Magn Reson Med, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  B. Rosen,et al.  Tracer arrival timing‐insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion‐weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block‐circulant deconvolution matrix , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[5]  Peter Reimer,et al.  Cerebral MR Perfusion Imaging: Principles and Current Applications , 2000 .

[6]  Fumiaki Tsumuraya,et al.  Deconvolution based on the Wiener–Lucy chain algorithm: an approach to recover local information losses in the deconvolution procedure , 1996 .

[7]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C (2nd ed.): the art of scientific computing , 1992 .

[8]  B. Rosen,et al.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  T. M. Cannon,et al.  Blind deconvolution through digital signal processing , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  D. A. Fish,et al.  Blind deconvolution by means of the Richardson-Lucy algorithm. , 1995 .

[12]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edition , 1992 .

[13]  A. Oppenheim,et al.  Nonlinear filtering of multiplied and convolved signals , 1968 .

[14]  B. C. McCallum Blind deconvolution by simulated annealing , 1990 .

[15]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Measuring blood volume and vascular transfer constant from dynamic, T  2* ‐weighted contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Leif Østergaard,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Perfusion-Weighted Imaging of Acute Cerebral Infarction: Effect of the Calculation Methods and Underlying Vasculopathy , 2002, Stroke.

[17]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  C. Rasmussen,et al.  Perfusion quantification using Gaussian process deconvolution , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  M. Viergever,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  T J Holmes,et al.  Blind deconvolution of quantum-limited incoherent imagery: maximum-likelihood approach. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  William H. Richardson,et al.  Bayesian-Based Iterative Method of Image Restoration , 1972 .

[22]  Hongguang Bi,et al.  When Does the Richardson-Lucy Deconvolution Converge ? , 1994 .

[23]  J. C. Dainty,et al.  Iterative blind deconvolution method and its applications , 1988 .

[24]  L. Lucy An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions , 1974 .

[25]  M A Viergever,et al.  Simultaneous quantitative cerebral perfusion and Gd‐DTPA extravasation measurement with dual‐echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[27]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[28]  E F Halpern,et al.  Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. , 1994, Radiology.