License to Fail? How Leader Group Prototypicality Moderates the Effects of Leader Performance on Perceptions of Leadership Effectiveness

Leadership often serves as an explanatory category for performance outcomes (i.e., failure and success). This process can strengthen or weaken leadership effectiveness, because contingent on their performance leaders may gain or lose follower endorsement — the basis of leadership. Drawing on the social identity analysis of leadership, we hypothesized that leader group prototypicality and performance information interact to predict followers' perceptions of leadership effectiveness. Because group prototypical leaders are more trusted by their followers, we hypothesized that group prototypical leaders are evaluated as more effective after failure information than non-prototypical leaders. In contrast, we predicted that both prototypical and non-prototypical leaders should receive similar evaluations of leadership effectiveness after success. We found support for our predictions in a scenario experiment, a cross-sectional field study, and a laboratory experiment.

[1]  J. Habermas.  On Social Identity , 1974, Telos.

[2]  R. Lord,et al.  Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skill , 2005 .

[3]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions , 1984 .

[4]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[5]  D. Cremer,et al.  How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. , 2002 .

[6]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings: Research Findings from Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, and Human Resource Management. , 1987 .

[7]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  Social Identity and Leadership Processes in Groups , 2003 .

[8]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  Leaders and Subgroups: One of Us or One of them? , 1999 .

[9]  M. Foddy,et al.  Leadership as the outcome of self-categorization processes , 2003 .

[10]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[11]  Robin Martin,et al.  Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[14]  R. Spears,et al.  A special gift we bestow on you for being representative of us: Considering leader charisma from a self-categorization perspective. , 2006, The British journal of social psychology.

[15]  Sanford B. Ehrlich,et al.  Small Groups: Key Readings , 2006 .

[16]  R. Thurik.  Entrepreneurship, Economic Growth and Policy in Emerging Economies , 2008 .

[17]  Florence Stinglhamber,et al.  Rewarding leadership and fair procedures as determinants of self-esteem. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  P. Koellinger,et al.  Acceleration of Technology Adoption within Firms : Empirical Evidence from the Diffusion of E-business Technologies , 2008 .

[19]  R. Lord,et al.  Identity, Leadership Categorization, and Leadership Schema , 2003 .

[20]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes , 2001 .

[21]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Intergroup bias. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  R. Lord,et al.  Implicit leadership theory: A potential threat to the internal validity of leader behavior questionnaires , 1977 .

[23]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Social Identity Theory of Leadership , 2001 .

[24]  Mark R. Leary,et al.  Handbook of self and identity , 2003 .

[25]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  The effect of performance cues and leader behavior on questionnaire ratings of leadership behavior , 1978 .

[26]  J. S. Phillips,et al.  Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership , 1981 .

[27]  W. Hulsink,et al.  The Locus of Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Firms: The Importance of Social Capital and Networking in Innovative Entrepreneurship , 2008 .

[28]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[29]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Collective Identity: Group Membership and Self-Conception , 2008 .

[30]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance , 2002 .

[31]  J. Osland,et al.  Advances in Global Leadership , 2006, Advances in Global Leadership.

[32]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[33]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[34]  D. Cremer,et al.  Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach , 2001 .

[35]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[36]  J. Turner,et al.  Social Identity and the Romance of Leadership: The Importance of being Seen to be ‘Doing it for Us’ , 2001 .

[37]  S. Reid,et al.  Leadership Endorsement: The Role of Distributive and Procedural Behavior in Interpersonal and Intergroup Contexts , 1998 .

[38]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Group Prototypically and Depersonalized Attraction in Small Interactive Groups , 1993 .

[39]  M. M. Chemers.  Leadership Effectiveness: An Integrative Review , 2008 .

[40]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  Social identity, self-categorization, and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups. , 1997 .

[42]  M. Hogg,et al.  Leadership and Power: Identity Processes in Groups and Organizations , 2004 .

[43]  Edwin P. Hollander,et al.  Leaders, groups, and influence. , 1965 .

[44]  S. Reicher,et al.  On the Science of the Art of Leadership , 2003 .

[45]  David De Cremer,et al.  Charismatic Leadership and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Matter of Transforming Motives?1 , 2002 .

[46]  Philip W. Wirtz,et al.  Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability , 1994 .

[47]  Susan Elaine Murphy,et al.  Cross-cultural variations in leadership perceptions and attribution of charisma to the leader , 2003 .

[48]  B. Shamir.  Attribution of Influence and Charisma to the Leader: The Romance of Leadership Revisited1 , 1992 .

[49]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Settings , 1987 .

[50]  M. Hogg,et al.  Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda , 2004 .

[51]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  An Exploration of Cognitive Demands in Group Interaction as a Moderator of Information Processing Variables in Perceptions of Leadership , 1991 .

[52]  M. Platow,et al.  A Social Identity Analysis of Leadership Endorsement: The Effects of Leader Ingroup Prototypicality and Distributive Intergroup Fairness , 2001 .

[53]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. , 1998 .

[54]  R. J. House,et al.  The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis? , 1997 .

[55]  J. Turner.  Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. , 2010 .

[56]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[57]  M. Evans.  A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis , 1985 .

[58]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  William L. Gardner,et al.  Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance , 1999 .

[60]  C. Judd,et al.  Adjusting researchers' approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions , 2004 .

[61]  Jeffrey C. Kohles,et al.  Romance of Leadership , 2009 .

[62]  Sanford B. Ehrlich,et al.  The Romance of Leadership and The Evaluation of Organizational Performance , 1987 .

[63]  Solly Angel.  The License to Fail , 2004 .

[64]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[65]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Self-Categorization and Leadership: Effects of Group Prototypicality and Leader Stereotypicality , 1997 .

[66]  F. Reid.  Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory , 1987 .

[67]  Guido Berens,et al.  Stimulating Strategically Aligned Behaviour Among Employees , 2007 .

[68]  John C. Turner,et al.  The Role of Prototypicality in Group Influence and Cohesion: Contextual Variation in the Graded Structure of Social Categories , 1998 .

[69]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: the moderating role of leader prototypicality. , 2005 .

[70]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1962 .

[71]  Darío Páez,et al.  Social Identity: International Perspectives , 1998 .

[72]  D. Cremer,et al.  Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence , 2004 .

[73]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of need for cognitive closure , 2005 .

[74]  M. Platow,et al.  The Link between Leadership and Followership: How Affirming Social Identity Translates Vision into Action , 2001 .

[75]  Celeste P.M. Wilderom,et al.  Cultural influences on leadership and organizations : Project GLOBE , 1999 .

[76]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[77]  C. Judd,et al.  Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[79]  L. Offermann,et al.  Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. , 1990 .

[80]  E. Dijk,et al.  Who Takes the Lead in Risky Decision Making? Effects of Group Members' Risk Preferences and Prototypicality , 2000 .

[81]  Yeon Choi,et al.  On the leadership function of self-sacrifice , 1998 .

[82]  S. Reid,et al.  Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. , 1997 .

[83]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[84]  M. Hogg,et al.  A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2003 .

[85]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research , 2000 .

[86]  Freda Kemp.  Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2003 .