The Role of Emergence in Service Systems

It has been recognized that a service systems perspective, informed by service-dominant logic, provides a dynamic approach for studying value cocreation. According to this view, value is the increase in the viability of the system in which actors co-create value. A construct from systems theory – emergence – can be of particular interest in contributing to and detracting from systems viability. Emergence is related to the nonlinear interactions characterizing systems’ elements that can give rise to novel and unpredictable properties not contained in the elements. This paper relates emergence to service systems based on the service-dominant logic and systems theory literature. Such issues can be useful for service science scholars to identify new research avenues for service systems.

[1]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective , 2015 .

[2]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service Ecosystems Emergence and Interaction: A Simulation Study , 2019, HICSS.

[3]  P. Davies,et al.  Conceptual Foundations of Emergence Theory , 2007 .

[4]  Arthur Peacocke,et al.  The Re-Emergence of Emergence The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion , 2007 .

[5]  F. Capra The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems , 1996 .

[6]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Service Science , 2007, Journal of Grid Computing.

[7]  T. Wolf,et al.  Emergence and self-organisation: a statement of similarities and differences , 2004 .

[8]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Collective knowledge systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[9]  Timothy O’Connor,et al.  EMERGENT PROPERTIES , 2021 .

[10]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  Viable Service Systems and Decision Making in Service Management , 2012 .

[11]  M. C. Jackson,et al.  Fifty years of systems thinking for management , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  W. Powell,et al.  Institutions , 2010 .

[13]  Francesco Polese,et al.  Smart Service Systems and Viable Service Systems: Applying Systems Theory to Service Science , 2010 .

[14]  Terrence W. Deacon,et al.  Emergence: The Hole at the Wheel’s Hub1 , 2008 .

[15]  P. Morgan THE IDEA AND PRACTICE OF SYSTEMS THINKING AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT , 2005 .

[16]  W. Ashby,et al.  Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems , 1991 .

[17]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[18]  R. Mishra,et al.  THE SELF-ORGANIZING UNIVERSE , 2022 .

[19]  Durant Drake Mind and its place in nature , 1927 .

[20]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Systems, networks, and ecosystems in service research , 2016 .

[21]  J. Crutchfield Is anything ever new?: considering emergence , 1999 .

[22]  J. D. Haan,et al.  How emergence arises , 2006 .

[23]  Linda D. Peters,et al.  The role of shared intentions in the emergence of service ecosystems , 2016 .

[24]  D. Chalmers Strong and Weak Emergence , 2006 .

[25]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[26]  Ernst von Glasersfeld,et al.  The radical constructivist view of science , 2001 .

[27]  Francesco Polese,et al.  An Introduction to the Viable Systems Approach and its Contribution to Marketing , 2012 .

[28]  Evert Gummesson,et al.  Case Theory in Business and Management: Reinventing Case Study Research , 2020 .

[29]  Gustavo Stubrich The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[30]  E. JeffreyGoldstein,et al.  Emergence as a Construct : History and Issues , 2000 .

[31]  Heiko Wieland,et al.  Toward a Service (Eco)Systems Perspective on Value Creation , 2012, Int. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. Eng. Technol..

[32]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service Ecosystem Emergence from Primitive Actors in Service Dominant Logic: An Exploratory Simulation Study , 2018, HICSS.

[33]  R. Sawyer,et al.  The Science of Social Emergence , 2009 .

[34]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Service-Dominant Logic , 2018 .

[35]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The service system is the basic abstraction of service science , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[36]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Clarifying the Concept of Smart Service System , 2018, Handbook of Service Science, Volume II.

[37]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  A service science perspective on business model innovation , 2013 .

[38]  P. Maglio,et al.  Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation , 2016 .

[39]  P. Checkland Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective a , 2000 .

[40]  John L. Casti,et al.  Complexification: Explaining a Paradoxical World Through the Science of Surprise , 1994 .

[41]  Sergio Barile,et al.  The dynamic of informative varieties in the processes of decision making , 2009 .

[42]  Ehud Meron,et al.  Pattern-formation approach to modelling spatially extended ecosystems , 2012 .

[43]  Alexandra Medina-Borja,et al.  Embedding Humans into Service Systems Analysis: The Evolution of Mathematical Thinking About Services , 2018, Handbook of Service Science, Volume II.

[44]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic 2025 , 2017 .

[45]  Jaegwon Kim,et al.  Making Sense of Emergence , 1999 .

[46]  K. Boulding General Systems Theory---The Skeleton of Science , 1956 .

[47]  Thomas Vogt,et al.  Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science , 2012 .

[48]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Advancing Service Science with Service-Dominant Logic , 2010 .

[49]  E. Mitleton-Kelly Ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures , 2003 .

[50]  Maurice Yolles,et al.  Organisations, Complexity, and Viable Knowledge Management , 2000 .

[51]  James F. Moore The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems , 1996 .

[52]  Giancarlo Nota,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of a 'T-Shaped' Knowledge: From Individuals to Cooperating Communities of Practice , 2012 .

[53]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[54]  A. Giddens Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[55]  Francesco Polese,et al.  Successful value co-creation exchanges – a VSA contribution , 2018 .

[56]  Linda D. Peters,et al.  Heteropathic versus homopathic resource integration and value co-creation in service ecosystems , 2016 .

[57]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Value cocreation and service systems (Re)formation: A service ecosystems view , 2012 .

[58]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Design (SSMED): An Emerging Discipline - Outline & References , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Serv. Sect..

[59]  R. Bhaskar Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom , 1993 .

[60]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers , 2003 .

[61]  Frank H. P. Fitzek,et al.  The Medium is the Message , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[62]  D. Sarno,et al.  Online Social Network Viability: Misinformation Management Based on Service and Systems Theories , 2018, International Journal of Business and Management.

[63]  Sarah Rothstein,et al.  Central Problems In Social Theory Action Structure And Contradiction In Social Analysis , 2016 .