Climate Change: Perceptions and Discourses of Risk

This paper discusses some of the issues that affect risk awareness with respect to climate change and what their impact has been on people's attitudes. It highlights the large gap between the scientific community and the general public in terms of their understanding, awareness and perception of risks associated with climate change. Awareness is driven both by environmental values or political and economic agendas; particularly important are worldviews and ‘myths of nature’, which have a great impact on risk perception. Attitudes are further complicated because the problem of climate change comprises a form of ‘post‐normal science’: it needs to be viewed holistically, with consideration of the feedbacks between the climate system, the human system and ecosystems; there is large uncertainty and a plurality of legitimate perspectives; and the issue is complex and difficult or impossible to fit into a traditional linear problem‐solving model. It is therefore not a rational decision for most individuals to take actions to reduce risk from climate change in the absence of collective action, yet collective action is extraordinarily difficult to achieve. The benefits of risk reduction also fall primarily upon future generations, while uncertainties mean that differences in perspective, and problems of poor communication, misinformation and unstated assumptions tend to cloud the social discourse.

[1]  Joe Smith Dangerous News: Media Decision Making about Climate Change Risk , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Willett Kempton,et al.  How the Public Views Climate Change , 1997 .

[3]  W. Adger,et al.  Eliciting Information from Experts on the Likelihood of Rapid Climate Change , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Stern Review : The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[5]  A. Leiserowitz Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values , 2006 .

[6]  Irene Lorenzoni,et al.  Dangerous Climate Change: The Role for Risk Research , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to climate change in Alberta, Canada: implications for public health policy and practice , 2004, International journal of environmental health research.

[8]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups , 2001 .

[9]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judged frequency of lethal events , 1978 .

[10]  Ingrid Leman-Stefanovic,et al.  Safeguarding our common future : rethinking sustainable development , 2000 .

[11]  Mitigating Natural Disasters: The Role Of Eco-Ethics , 2005 .

[12]  P. Slovic Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment Battlefield , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Bill Devall,et al.  Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered , 1985 .

[14]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[15]  Lawrence J. Axelrod,et al.  Perceived ecological risks of global change: A psychometric comparison of causes and consequences☆ , 1996 .

[16]  G. Backhaus Safeguarding Our Common Future: Rethinking Sustainable Development , 2002 .

[17]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Lay perspectives on global climate change1 , 1991 .

[18]  Leslie Daryl Danny Harvey,et al.  Global warming : the hard science , 2000 .

[19]  J. Shanahan,et al.  Telling Stories About Global Climate Change , 1999 .

[20]  E. Weber Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming does not Scare us (Yet) , 2006 .

[21]  L. Clarke Mission Improbable: Using Fantasy Documents to Tame Disaster , 1999 .

[22]  Dennis L. Meadows,et al.  Limits to growth : the 30-year update , 2004 .

[23]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. , 2007 .

[24]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[25]  S. Arrhenius “On the Infl uence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground” (1896) , 2017, The Future of Nature.

[26]  Sin Autor Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update , 2006 .

[27]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Abrupt climate change: can society cope? , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[28]  M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Defining Dangerous Anthropogenic Interference: The Role of Science, the Limits of Science , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[29]  J. Sterman,et al.  Cloudy Skies: Assessing Public Understanding of Global Warming , 2002 .

[30]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[31]  R. J. Bord,et al.  Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change , 1999 .

[32]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  The Perception and Valuation of the Risks of Climate Change: A Rational and Behavioral Blend , 2005 .

[33]  Anthony Patt,et al.  Using Specific Language to Describe Risk and Probability , 2003 .

[34]  L. Steg,et al.  Cultural Theory and Individual Perceptions of Environmental Risks , 2000 .

[35]  Anthony A Leiserowitz,et al.  American Risk Perceptions: Is Climate Change Dangerous? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[36]  Karl Dake Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of Risk , 1992 .

[37]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[38]  B. Wisner,et al.  At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters , 1996 .