How Context-Aware Are Extant BPM Methods? - Development of an Assessment Scheme

Context awareness is vital for business process management (BPM) success. Although many academics have called for context-aware BPM, current BPM research and practice do not seem to sufficiently account for various contexts. To examine whether this statement holds true, we developed an assessment scheme that enables determining to which extent existing BPM methods can be applied in various contexts. We identified 25 exemplary BPM methods based on a structured literature review and rated them according to their applicability to different context dimensions, i.e., goal, process, organization and environment dimension. Our results indicate that most BPM methods are rather context-independent, i.e., they are not geared to specific contexts. Accordingly, the investigated BPM methods follow a one-size-fits-all approach and practitioners have no guidance on how to tailor BPM in their organizations. In particular, there is a lack of BPM methods for explorative purposes as well as for knowledge- and creativity-intense business processes. In the digital age, which is characterized by volatility and high pressure for innovation, these domains are very important. Our research is a first step toward context-aware BPM methods and structured guidance for organizations regarding the systematic selection and configuration of BPM methods.

[1]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process , 2009, ECIS.

[2]  Antonello Cammarano,et al.  Open innovation scorecard: a managerial tool , 2017, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[3]  Florian Johannsen,et al.  Wand and Weber's good decomposition conditions for BPMN: An interpretation and differences to Event-Driven Process Chains , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[4]  Eva-Maria Kern,et al.  Surveys in business process management - a literature review , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[5]  Maximilian Röglinger,et al.  Process improvement through economically driven routing of instances , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[6]  Jan Recker,et al.  Ten principles of good business process management , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[7]  Marcelo Fantinato,et al.  Dynamic product line for Business Process Management , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[8]  Jan Recker,et al.  Contextualisation of business processes , 2008, Int. J. Bus. Process. Integr. Manag..

[9]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  On the role of context in business process management , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[10]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[11]  Armando Calabrese,et al.  Combining modelling and simulation approaches: How to measure performance of business processes , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[12]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[13]  Farzad Soltani,et al.  Fuzzy model on selecting processes in Business Process Reengineering , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[14]  Rita Lavikka,et al.  A process for building inter-organizational contextual ambidexterity , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[15]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[16]  Jan Recker,et al.  Which cultural values matter to business process management?: Results from a global Delphi study , 2013, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[17]  Janina Fengel,et al.  Semantic technologies for aligning heterogeneous business process models , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[18]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Frameworks for Business Process Management: A Taxonomy for Business Process Management Cases , 2018, Business Process Management Cases.

[19]  R. Likert.  “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Towards a Business Process Management Maturity Model , 2005, ECIS.

[21]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  BPM for change management: two process diagnosis techniques , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[22]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[24]  Jantima Polpinij,et al.  Mining business rules from business process model repositories , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[25]  Raffaele Fiorentino,et al.  Operations strategy: a firm boundary-based perspective , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[26]  Jan Recker,et al.  The quest for organizational flexibility: Driving changes in business processes through the identification of relevant context , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[27]  Kyösti Pennanen,et al.  The value space: how firms facilitate value creation , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[28]  Alex Miller,et al.  Using information-processing theory to understand planning/performance relationships in the context of strategy , 1999 .

[29]  W.M.P. van der Aalst,et al.  Business Process Management: A Comprehensive Survey , 2013 .

[30]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Proposals for Future BPM Research Directions , 2014, AP-BPM.

[31]  Carla Schwengber ten Caten,et al.  Assessment model for organizational business process maturity with a focus on BPM governance practices , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[32]  Flávia Maria Santoro,et al.  Ownership relevance in aspect-oriented business process models , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[33]  Qing Hu,et al.  Implications of the fit between organizational structure and ERP: A structural contingency theory perspective , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[34]  Daniel Pacheco Lacerda,et al.  A process improvement approach based on the Value Stream Mapping and the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[35]  Bill Karakostas,et al.  A framework to capture and reuse process knowledge in business process design and execution using social tagging , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[36]  Maximilian Röglinger,et al.  How to Exploit the Digitalization Potential of Business Processes , 2018, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[37]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Business Process Management in the Digital Age , 2017 .

[38]  T. S. Ragu-Nathan,et al.  The Q-Sort Method: Assessing Reliability And Construct Validity Of Questionnaire Items At A Pre-Testing Stage , 2002 .

[39]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Three-Point Likert Scales Are Good Enough , 1971 .

[40]  Stijn Viaene,et al.  From business process management to customer process management , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[41]  Manfred A. Jeusfeld,et al.  Enterprise Modeling for Business Agility , 2018, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[42]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  What does it take to implement open innovation? Towards an integrated capability framework , 2017, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[43]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Comprehensible Predictive Models for Business Processes , 2016, MIS Q..

[44]  Ali Khosravi,et al.  Business process rearrangement and renaming: A new approach to process orientation and improvement , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[45]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[46]  Axel Winkelmann,et al.  Detecting potential weaknesses in business processes: An exploration of semantic pattern matching in process models , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[47]  João Barata,et al.  MUVE IT: reduce the friction in business processes , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[48]  P. Harmon.  The State of Business Process Management , 2013 .

[49]  Maximilian Röglinger,et al.  Interview with Michael Rosemann on ambidextrous business process management , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[50]  Hanêne Ben-Abdallah,et al.  A methodology for the semantic and structural restructuring of BPMN models , 2017, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[51]  Flávia Maria Santoro,et al.  Exploring location-dependency in process modeling , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..