Municipal street maintenance can be either performed by a local authority or by a private provider through public–private partnership (PPP) or outsourcing. The choice of either alternative requires proof of economic efficiency at the planning phase of these services. The economic model presented in this paper outlines the basis for the comprehensive probabilistic comparison of the economic efficiency of two approaches: (1) self-performance (public sector delivery) and (2) performance by a private provider (PPP delivery). Based on clear system boundaries, the net present values of the two alternatives are addressed, including possible risk costs. The results of the efficiency comparison are then evaluated using the net present value difference axiom and the net present value efficiency axiom. To ensure that the short-term effects of privatizing or outsourcing street maintenance services are not overrated and the long-term economic efficiency is maintained, the analysis must cover at least two long-term periods.
[1]
Mervyn K. Lewis,et al.
Accounting for Public Private Partnerships
,
2002
.
[2]
Halim A. Boussabaine,et al.
Whole Life-Cycle Costing
,
2004
.
[3]
Xueqing Zhang.
Public Clients' Best Value Perspectives of Public Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Development
,
2006
.
[4]
David Heald,et al.
Value for money tests and accounting treatment in PFI schemes
,
2003
.
[5]
Donald G. Newnan.
Engineering Economic Analysis
,
2017
.
[6]
Mervyn K. Lewis,et al.
Are Public Private Partnerships value for money?
,
2005
.
[7]
Xueqing Zhang,et al.
Factor Analysis of Public Clients’ Best-Value Objective in Public–Privately Partnered Infrastructure Projects
,
2006
.