Evaluation of planning policy for protecting green infrastructure from loss and degradation due to residential encroachment

Abstract Studies indicate substantial degradation and loss of urban green infrastructure area following adjacent residential development. A content analysis of Ontario’s most authoritative policy documents was performed to determine whether they had policy goals, objectives and tools for protecting designated green infrastructure from the negative impacts of residential encroachment. Results indicate few policy goals, or measurable objectives. Furthermore, few policy tools sought to limit residential encroachment within green infrastructure following point of development. Existing local government policy tools were narrowly focused on establishing boundary structures and education programs among adjacent residents, without specifying impacts of concern. Policies requiring the monitoring of impacts and tools for their mitigation were missing. Long-term protection policy goals, measurable policy objectives, and effective policy tools are required to limit the anticipated negative impacts associated with residential encroachment following development. Where impacts are uncertain, monitoring policies are required to test and improve policy effectiveness. Furthermore, adaptive management policies are required to protect essential ecosystem services from unanticipated long term impacts, such as those arriving with climate change.

[1]  G. Matlack Sociological edge effects: Spatial distribution of human impact in suburban forest fragments , 1993 .

[2]  Andy Clayden,et al.  Design with Microclimate: The Secret to Comfortable Outdoor Spaces , 2012 .

[3]  Sean A. Parks,et al.  Reserve Size, Local Human Density, and Mammalian Extinctions in U.S. Protected Areas , 2002 .

[4]  Kenneth W. Potter,et al.  MODELED IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT TYPE ON RUNOFF VOLUME AND INFILTRATION PERFORMANCE 1 , 2004 .

[5]  Robert D. Brown,et al.  The housing-forest interface: Testing structural approaches for protecting suburban natural systems following development , 2010 .

[6]  M. Hermy,et al.  Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders , 2004 .

[7]  Barriers to the effective planning and management of residential encroachment within urban forest edges: A Southern Ontario, Canada case study , 2014 .

[8]  Renae N Stenhouse,et al.  Fragmentation and internal disturbance of native vegetation reserves in the Perth metropolitan area, Western Australia , 2004 .

[9]  Robert D. Brown,et al.  Effects of recreational use impacts on hiking experiences in natural areas , 2003 .

[10]  R. Bagnall A study of human impact on an urban forest remnant: Redwood Bush, Tawa, near Wellington, New Zealand , 1979 .

[11]  R. Ricard,et al.  Defining urban forestry – A comparative perspective of North America and Europe , 2006 .

[12]  Peter Vogt,et al.  A National Assessment of Green Infrastructure and Change for the Conterminous United States Using Morphological Image Processing , 2010 .

[13]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Songbird and Medium‐Sized Mammal Communities Associated with Exurban Development in Pitkin County, Colorado , 2001 .

[14]  Robert B. Olshansky,et al.  Land Use Planning for Seismic Safety: The Los Angeles County Experience, 1971–1994 , 2001 .

[15]  D. Cole Backcountry impact management: Lessons from research , 1994 .

[16]  Andrew J. Hansen,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXURBAN DEVELOPMENT ON BIODIVERSITY: PATTERNS, MECHANISMS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS , 2005 .

[17]  A. Kaźmierczak,et al.  Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review , 2007 .

[18]  M. Moran Influence of adjacent land use on understory vegetation of New York forests , 1984 .

[19]  Ruth DeFries,et al.  Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  Y. Leung,et al.  Spatial strategies for managing visitor impacts in National Parks , 1999 .

[21]  Christine M. Schonewald,et al.  Patterns of human disturbance and response by small mammals and birds in chaparral near urban development , 1998, Urban Ecosystems.

[22]  D. Theobald,et al.  Residential Development Encroachment on U.S. Protected Areas , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  Mark Hostetler,et al.  Conserving urban biodiversity? Creating green infrastructure is only the first step , 2011 .

[24]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations , 2009 .

[25]  M. Bruce Beck Vulnerability of water quality in intensively developing urban watersheds , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  Clas Florgård,et al.  Residents' use of remnant natural vegetation in the residential area of Järvafältet, Stockholm. , 2006 .

[27]  G. Xie,et al.  The economic benefits of rainwater-runoff reduction by urban green spaces: a case study in Beijing, China. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Michael Hough,et al.  Cities and natural process , 1994 .

[29]  Clas Florgård Long-term changes in indigenous vegetation preserved in urban areas. , 2000 .

[30]  Volker Meyer,et al.  Integrated urban flood risk assessment – adapting a multicriteria approach to a city , 2009 .

[31]  E. Revilla,et al.  Edge‐Core Effects and the Effectiveness of Traditional Reserves in Conservation: Eurasian Badgers in Doñana National Park , 2001 .

[32]  Robert L. Glicksman Ecosystem Resilience to Disruptions Linked to Global Climate Change: An Adaptive Approach to Federal Land Management , 2009 .

[33]  Kathryn G. Arano,et al.  Linking urban forests and urban tourism: a case of Savannah, Georgia. , 2010 .

[34]  D. Cole Effects of three seasons of experimental trampling on five montane forest communities and a grassland in western Montana, USA. , 1987 .

[35]  J. Jokimäki,et al.  ARTIFICIAL NEST PREDATION AND ABUNDANCE OF BIRDS ALONG AN URBAN GRADIENT , 2000 .

[37]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[38]  David J. Nowak,et al.  People and Trees: Assessing the US Urban Forest Resource , 2001 .

[39]  D. M. Sharpe,et al.  Fate of natural vegetation during urban development of rural landscapes in Southeastern Wisconsin , 1986 .

[40]  S. Hall,et al.  Residential landscapes as social-ecological systems: a synthesis of multi-scalar interactions between people and their home environment , 2011, Urban Ecosystems.

[41]  W. Seidling Räumliche Struktur einer subspontanen Population von Taxus baccata-Jungpflanzen , 1999 .

[42]  David Styles,et al.  Importance of spatial and temporal patterns for assessment of risk of diffuse nutrient emissions to surface waters , 2005 .

[43]  Robert D. Brown,et al.  Effectiveness of Boundary Structures in Limiting Residential Encroachment into Urban Forests , 2012 .

[44]  Curtis H. Flather,et al.  Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  M. Pettersson,et al.  Adaptive capacity of legal and policy frameworks for biodiversity protection considering climate change , 2013 .

[46]  Evaluation of planning and management approaches for limiting residential encroachment impacts within forest edges: A Southern Ontario case study , 2012, Urban Ecosystems.

[47]  P. Eagles,et al.  Effects of Residential Development on Forest-Dwelling Neotropical Migrant Songbirds , 1995 .

[48]  Edward L. Thackston,et al.  Housing Density and Bacterial Loading in Urban Streams , 1999 .

[49]  D. Nowak,et al.  Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. , 2002, Environmental pollution.