When branch autonomy fails: Milton's Law of resource availability and allocation.

The branch autonomy principle states that the critical characteristics of a branch's carbohydrate economy (photosynthesis, respiration, growth, etc.) are largely independent of the tree to which the branch is attached, as long as light is the primary factor limiting photosynthesis and growth. However, this may not be generally true because in the spring, photosynthates are translocated from a tree stem into branches, and the amount of photosynthate available for translocation should be a function of the tree's canopy status. And the correlative inhibition principle states that a branch's priority for allocation of carbon and other resources is controlled not only by its own environment, but also by its position relative to other branches on the same tree. A study of the lower limit of branch growth and survival in trees of different sizes shows that the latter principle is more important: even though dominant trees have more resources to allocate, branches on suppressed trees are able to grow and produce new foliage at solar irradiances where branches on dominant trees die. Thus branches are sufficiently interdependent that a positive carbon budget by itself does not ensure branch survival; branch position relative to other branches on the same tree is also important. Other findings indicate that this result is quite general: regardless of the stress involved, a stressed branch on a tree where all other branches are also stressed does better than a similarly stressed branch on a tree where some branches are relatively unstressed. Although branch autonomy is an important and useful principle, it is not an absolute rule governing branch growth.

[1]  H. Mooney,et al.  Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy , 1985 .

[2]  B. Wilson,et al.  Apical control of branch growth and angle in woody plants. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[3]  W. Bond,et al.  The Influence of Grazing on the Evolution, Morphology and Physiology of Plants as Modular Organisms [and Discussion] , 1991 .

[4]  Erkki Haukioja,et al.  Why does a branch suffer more after branch-wide than after tree-wide defoliation ? , 1994 .

[5]  A. Novoplansky,et al.  TREE FORM: ARCHITECTURAL MODELS DO NOT SUFFICE , 1995 .

[6]  P. Larson,et al.  Redistribution of 14C-labeled reserve food in young Red Pines during shoot elongation. , 1970 .

[7]  J. Witowski Gas exchange of the lowest branches of young Scots pine: a cost-benefit analysis of seasonal branch carbon budget. , 1997, Tree physiology.

[8]  A. Takenaka,et al.  Shoot growth responses to light microenvironment and correlative inhibition in tree seedlings under a forest canopy. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[9]  D. Sprugel,et al.  Effects of light on shoot geometry and needle morphology in Abies amabilis. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[10]  Dan Cohen,et al.  Plants as competing populations of redundant organs , 1993 .

[11]  E. David Ford,et al.  The role of epicormic shoot production in maintaining foliage in old Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir) trees , 2001 .

[12]  D. Whitehead,et al.  Response of transpiration and photosynthesis to a transient change in illuminated foliage area for a Pinus radiata D. Don tree , 1996 .

[13]  F. Meinzer,et al.  Boundary layer conductance, leaf temperature and transpiration of Abies amabilis branches. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[14]  R. W. Snow Experiments on Growth and Inhibition. Part II.--New Phenomena of Inhibition , 1931 .

[15]  P. Reich,et al.  Canopy structure and vertical patterns of photosynthesis and related leaf traits in a deciduous forest , 1993, Oecologia.

[16]  Margaret C. Anderson Studies of the Woodland Light Climate: I. The Photographic Computation of Light Conditions , 1964 .

[17]  Modelling canopy growth and steady-state leaf area index in an aspen stand , 2000 .

[18]  Bart Kruijt,et al.  Acclimation of photosynthesis to light: a mechanistic approach , 1999 .

[19]  Peter Stoll,et al.  Plant foraging and dynamic competition between branches of Pinus sylvestris in contrasting light environments , 1998 .

[20]  Pauline Stenberg,et al.  Shoot structure, light interception, and distribution of nitrogen in an Abies amabilis canopy. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[21]  Alexandre Bosc,et al.  EMILION, a tree functional-structural model: Presentation and first application to the analysis of branch carbon balance , 2000 .

[22]  P. Melcher,et al.  Hydrogel Control of Xylem Hydraulic Resistance in Plants , 2001, Science.

[23]  C. Lovelock,et al.  Effects of elevated CO2 concentrations on photosynthesis, growth and reproduction of branches of the tropical canopy tree species, Luehea seemannii Tr. & Planch. , 1999 .

[24]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Growth response of branches of Picea sitchensis to four years exposure to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration , 1999 .

[25]  C. Field,et al.  Allocating leaf nitrogen for the maximization of carbon gain: Leaf age as a control on the allocation program , 1983, Oecologia.

[26]  D. Dickmann,et al.  Mobilization and Incorporation of Photoassimilated C by Growing Vegetative and Reproductive Tissues of Adult Pinus resinosa Ait. Trees. , 1970, Plant physiology.

[27]  K. Vogt,et al.  Biomass distribution and above- and below-ground production in young and mature Abiesamabilis zone ecosystems of the Washington Cascades , 1981 .

[28]  M Cline,et al.  Concepts and terminology of apical dominance. , 1997, American journal of botany.

[29]  V. Kitunen,et al.  Responses of Pinus sylvestris branches to simulated herbivory are modified by tree sink/source dynamics and by external resources , 1999 .

[30]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Models of Integrated Photosynthesis of Cells and Leaves , 1989 .

[31]  Dan Cohen,et al.  Ecological implications of correlative inhibition between plant shoots , 1989 .

[32]  Thomas M. Hinckley,et al.  THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF BRANCH AUTONOMY , 1991 .