Refining multimeric protein complexes using conservation, electrostatics and probabilistic selection

We introduce a multimeric docking refinement method that uses a scoring function based on a tight coupling between evolutionary conservation, geometry and pairwise interactions. Detection of protein complexes and their structures is crucial for understanding the role of protein complexes in the basic biology of organisms. Computational methods can provide researchers with a good starting point for the analysis of protein complexes. However, computational docking methods are often not accurate and their results need to be further refined to improve interface packing. Additionally, most docking methods focus on dimers due to the exponential growth in computational complexity caused by the addition of monomeric units. Multimeric docking and refinement methods should employ efficient selection criteria to reduce the search space. The incorporation of evolutionary conservation allows us to bias our results towards possible functional interface. We combine our search with a probabilistic selection scheme that allows us to escape local energy minima. Our results suggest that our refinement scheme can efficiently handle complexes with more than 2 monomers and help biasing the results towards complexes with native interactions, filtering out false positive results. We produce structures with better IRMSDs with respect to the known complexes and lower energies than those initial docked structures.

[1]  A J Olson,et al.  Structural symmetry and protein function. , 2000, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[2]  Amarda Shehu,et al.  Refinement of docked protein complex structures using evolutionary traces , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW).

[3]  B. Donald,et al.  Structure determination of symmetric homo‐oligomers by a complete search of symmetry configuration space, using NMR restraints and van der Waals packing , 2006, Proteins.

[4]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[5]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  A family of evolution-entropy hybrid methods for ranking protein residues by importance. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  David Baker,et al.  Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Combinatorial docking approach for structure prediction of large proteins and multi-molecular assemblies , 2005, Physical biology.

[8]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  M-ZDOCK: a grid-based approach for Cn symmetric multimer docking , 2005, Bioinform..

[11]  Amarda Shehu,et al.  An Evolutionary conservation-Based Method for Refining and Reranking protein Complex Structures , 2012, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[12]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Geometry‐based flexible and symmetric protein docking , 2005, Proteins.

[14]  Yifeng D. Yang,et al.  Multi‐LZerD: Multiple protein docking for asymmetric complexes , 2012, Proteins.

[15]  Amarda Shehu,et al.  Guiding protein docking with Geometric and Evolutionary Information , 2012, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[16]  L. T. Ten Eyck,et al.  Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[17]  Trilce Estrada,et al.  Evaluation of Several Two-Step Scoring Functions Based on Linear Interaction Energy, Effective Ligand Size, and Empirical Pair Potentials for Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Geometry and Free Energy , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[18]  D. J. Price,et al.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking. , 2002, Current Opinion in Structural Biology.