Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. II. Dependence on spectral parameters.

This and two accompanying articles [Breebaart et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1074-1088 (2001); 110, 1105-1117 (2001)] describe a computational model for the signal processing in the binaural auditory system. The model consists of several stages of monaural and binaural preprocessing combined with an optimal detector. In the present article the model is tested and validated by comparing its predictions with experimental data for binaural discrimination and masking conditions as a function of the spectral parameters of both masker and signal. For this purpose, the model is used as an artificial observer in a three-interval, forced-choice adaptive procedure. All model parameters were kept constant for all simulations described in this and the subsequent article. The effects of the following experimental parameters were investigated: center frequency of both masker and target, bandwidth of masker and target, the interaural phase relations of masker and target, and the level of the masker. Several phenomena that occur in binaural listening conditions can be accounted for. These include the wider effective binaural critical bandwidth observed in band-widening NoS(pi) conditions, the different masker-level dependence of binaural detection thresholds for narrow- and for wide-band maskers, the unification of IID and ITD sensitivity with binaural detection data, and the dependence of binaural thresholds on frequency.

[1]  S van de Par,et al.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. III. Dependence on temporal parameters. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  A. Kohlrausch,et al.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. I. Model structure. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A. Kohlrausch,et al.  The influence of interaural stimulus uncertainty on binaural signal detection. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  S van de Par,et al.  Dependence of binaural masking level differences on center frequency, masker bandwidth, and interaural parameters. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S van de Par,et al.  The contribution of static and dynamically varying ITDs and IIDs to binaural detection. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  D. J. Breebaart,et al.  Measuring the role of masker‐correlation uncertainty in binaural masking experiments , 1999 .

[7]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Binaural and monaural auditory filter bandwidths and time constants in probe tone detection experiments. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Ag Armin Kohlrausch,et al.  Binaural signal detection with phase-shifted and time-delayed noise maskers , 1998 .

[9]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Binaural detection as a function of interaural correlation and bandwidth of masking noise: implications for estimates of spectral resolution. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S van de Par,et al.  Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Richard M. Stern,et al.  Lateralization and detection of low‐frequency binaural stimuli: Effects of distribution of internal delay , 1996 .

[12]  T Dau,et al.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Auditory filter bandwidths in binaural and monaural listening conditions. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  A Kohlrausch,et al.  Spectral integration of broadband signals in diotic and dichotic masking experiments. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[16]  J. Hall,et al.  NoSo and NoS pi thresholds as a function of masker level for narrow-band and wideband masking noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  M A Fernandes,et al.  The role of monaural frequency selectivity in binaural analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  M A Fernandes,et al.  Monaural and binaural auditory frequency resolution measured using bandlimited noise and notched-noise masking. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Differences of interaural phase and level in detection and lateralization: 250 Hz. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  P J Metz,et al.  Further results on binaural unmasking and the EC model. II. Noise band width and interaural phase. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Man Mohan Sondhi,et al.  Width of the Spectrum Effective in the Binaural Release of Masking , 1966 .

[23]  N I Durlach,et al.  Further results on binaural unmasking and the EC model. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  E. de Boer,et al.  Masking and Discrimination , 1966 .

[25]  Lloyd A. Jeffress,et al.  Effect of Bandwidth of Masking Noise on Detection of Homophasic and Antiphasic Tonal Signals , 1965 .

[26]  P B WESTON,et al.  USE OF NOISE TO ELIMINATE ONE EAR FROM MASKING EXPERIMENTS. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Ira J. Hirsh,et al.  Binaural Effects in Remote Masking , 1958 .

[28]  R. G. Klumpp,et al.  Some Measurements of Interaural Time Difference Thresholds , 1956 .