Opening angles and material properties of the early embryonic chick brain.

Mechanical forces play an important role during brain development. In the early embryo, the anterior end of the neural tube enlarges and differentiates into the major brain subdivisions, including three expanding vesicles (forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain) separated by two constrictions. Once the anterior neuropore and the spinal neurocoel occlude, the brain tube undergoes further regional growth and expansion in response to increasing cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Although this is known to be a response to mechanical loads, the mechanical properties of the developing brain remain largely unknown. In this work, we measured regional opening angles (due to residual stress) and stiffness of the embryonic chick brain during Hamburger-Hamilton stages 11-13 (approximately 42-51 h incubation). Opening angles resulting from a radial cut on transverse brain slices were about 40-110 deg (depending on region and stage) and served as an indicator of circumferential residual stress. In addition, using a custom-made microindentation device and finite-element models, we determined regional indentation stiffness and material properties. The results indicate that the modulus is relatively independent of position and stage of development with the average shear modulus being about 220 Pa for stages 11-13 chick brains. Information on the regional material properties of the early embryonic brain will help illuminate the process of early brain morphogenesis.

[1]  Larry A. Taber,et al.  Theoretical study of Beloussov’s hyper-restoration hypothesis for mechanical regulation of morphogenesis , 2008, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[2]  R. Jelínek,et al.  The pressure of encephalic fluid in chick embryos between the 2nd and 6th day of incubation. , 1968, Physiologia Bohemoslovaca.

[3]  Larry A Taber,et al.  On the effects of residual stress in microindentation tests of soft tissue structures. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  J. van Dommelen,et al.  The influence of test conditions on characterization of the mechanical properties of brain tissue. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  Larry A Taber,et al.  Material properties and residual stress in the stage 12 chick heart during cardiac looping. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  David F Meaney,et al.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Michael L. Levitan,et al.  Internal luminal pressure during early chick embryonic brain growth: descriptive and empirical observations. , 2005, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[8]  Michael L. Levitan,et al.  Brain expansion in the chick embryo initiated by experimentally produced occlusion of the spinal neurocoel , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[9]  L. Wolpert Developmental Biology , 1968, Nature.

[10]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  A. McCulloch,et al.  Stress-dependent finite growth in soft elastic tissues. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  G. Schoenwolf,et al.  Neural tube occlusion precedes rapid brain enlargement. , 1984, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[13]  L. Taber,et al.  Mechanical Asymmetry in the Embryonic Chick Heart During Looping , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Larry A Taber,et al.  Cardiac looping in experimental conditions: Effects of extraembryonic forces , 2002, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[15]  G. C. Rogers,et al.  Microtubule motors in mitosis , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Karol Miller,et al.  Brain mechanics For neurosurgery: modeling issues , 2002, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[17]  A. Gefen,et al.  Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat. , 2003, Journal of neurotrauma.

[18]  G. Schoenwolf,et al.  Quantification of the initial phases of rapid brain enlargement in the chick embryo. , 1986, The American journal of anatomy.

[19]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[20]  S. Margulies,et al.  Age-dependent material properties of the porcine cerebrum: effect on pediatric inertial head injury criteria. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Renato Perucchio,et al.  Modeling Heart Development , 2000 .

[22]  Y C Fung,et al.  Change of Residual Strains in Arteries due to Hypertrophy Caused by Aortic Constriction , 1989, Circulation research.

[23]  C. Gans,et al.  Biomechanics: Motion, Flow, Stress, and Growth , 1990 .

[24]  Ronan O'Rahilly,et al.  The growth of the human brain during the embryonic period proper , 1981, Anatomy and Embryology.

[25]  M. Prange,et al.  Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  M. E. Desmond,et al.  Embryonic brain enlargement requires cerebrospinal fluid pressure. , 1977, Developmental biology.