Optimal compressed sensing reconstructions of fMRI using 2D deterministic and stochastic sampling geometries

BackgroundCompressive sensing can provide a promising framework for accelerating fMRI image acquisition by allowing reconstructions from a limited number of frequency-domain samples. Unfortunately, the majority of compressive sensing studies are based on stochastic sampling geometries that cannot guarantee fast acquisitions that are needed for fMRI. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive optimization framework that can be used to determine the optimal 2D stochastic or deterministic sampling geometry, as well as to provide optimal reconstruction parameter values for guaranteeing image quality in the reconstructed images.MethodsWe investigate the use of frequency-space (k-space) sampling based on: (i) 2D deterministic geometries of dyadic phase encoding (DPE) and spiral low pass (SLP) geometries, and (ii) 2D stochastic geometries based on random phase encoding (RPE) and random samples on a PDF (RSP). Overall, we consider over 36 frequency-sampling geometries at different sampling rates. For each geometry, we compute optimal reconstructions of single BOLD fMRI ON & OFF images, as well as BOLD fMRI activity maps based on the difference between the ON and OFF images. We also provide an optimization framework for determining the optimal parameters and sampling geometry prior to scanning.ResultsFor each geometry, we show that reconstruction parameter optimization converged after just a few iterations. Parameter optimization led to significant image quality improvements. For activity detection, retaining only 20.3% of the samples using SLP gave a mean PSNR value of 57.58 dB. We also validated this result with the use of the Structural Similarity Index Matrix (SSIM) image quality metric. SSIM gave an excellent mean value of 0.9747 (max = 1). This indicates that excellent reconstruction results can be achieved. Median parameter values also gave excellent reconstruction results for the ON/OFF images using the SLP sampling geometry (mean SSIM > =0.93). Here, median parameter values were obtained using mean-SSIM optimization. This approach was also validated using leave-one-out.ConclusionsWe have found that compressive sensing parameter optimization can dramatically improve fMRI image reconstruction quality. Furthermore, 2D MRI scanning based on the SLP geometries consistently gave the best image reconstruction results. The implication of this result is that less complex sampling geometries will suffice over random sampling. We have also found that we can obtain stable parameter regions that can be used to achieve specific levels of image reconstruction quality when combined with specific k-space sampling geometries. Furthermore, median parameter values can be used to obtain excellent reconstruction results.

[1]  Bernd Girod,et al.  What's wrong with mean-squared error? , 1993 .

[2]  Yasser M Kadah,et al.  Deconvolution‐interpolation gridding (DING): Accurate reconstruction for arbitrary k‐space trajectories , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Martin A Lindquist,et al.  Rapid three-dimensional functional magnetic resonance imaging of the initial negative BOLD response. , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[4]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Compressed-Sensing MRI With Random Encoding , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Jesse Tanguay,et al.  A theoretical comparison of x-ray angiographic image quality using energy-dependent and conventional subtraction methods. , 2011, Medical physics.

[6]  K Sekihara,et al.  Detecting cortical activities from fMRI time‐course data using the music algorithm with forward and backward covariance averaging , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Galen Reeves,et al.  “Compressed” compressed sensing , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[8]  W. Manning,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[10]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Compressed sensing in dynamic MRI , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  ProblemsPer Christian HansenDepartment The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems , 2000 .

[12]  S. T. Nichols,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of several partial fourier reconstruction algorithms used in mri , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Andreas Greiser,et al.  Efficient k‐space sampling by density‐weighted phase‐encoding , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[15]  P. J. Huber The 1972 Wald Lecture Robust Statistics: A Review , 1972 .

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Bo Liu,et al.  Sparsesense: Application of compressed sensing in parallel MRI , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[18]  R R Edelman,et al.  Comparison of the BOLD‐ and EPISTAR‐technique for functional brain imaging by using signal detection theory , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  D. Peters,et al.  Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  S C Strother,et al.  Commentary and Opinion: I. Principal Component Analysis, Variance Partitioning, and “Functional Connectivity” , 1995, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[21]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Improved k–t BLAST and k–t SENSE using FOCUSS , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  Direct search algorithms for optimization calculations , 1998, Acta Numerica.

[24]  R. Nowak,et al.  Generalized likelihood ratio detection for fMRI using complex data , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  R B Buxton,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Andy M. Yip,et al.  Recent Developments in Total Variation Image Restoration , 2004 .

[28]  H. Knutsson,et al.  Detection of neural activity in functional MRI using canonical correlation analysis , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Sparse MRI Reconstruction via Multiscale L0-Continuation , 2007, 2007 IEEE/SP 14th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing.

[30]  W. Perman,et al.  Improved detectability in low signal-to-noise ratio magnetic resonance images by means of a phase-corrected real reconstruction. , 1989, Medical physics.