Dual-energy CT for the assessment of chronic myocardial infarction in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: comparison with 3-T MRI.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to compare the performance of dual-energy CT with that of 3-T MRI with late enhancement for the detection of chronic myocardial infarction during first-pass coronary CT angiography (CTA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS Thirty-six patients underwent coronary CTA for the assessment of coronary bypass graft patency on a first-generation dual-source CT scanner in dual-energy mode. Gray-scale images (100 kV, 140 kV, and blended virtual 120 kV) were assessed for areas of hypodense myocardium during the arterial phase. In addition, a color-coded map of myocardial iodine distribution was calculated from the dual-energy data for perfusion analysis. Dual-energy CT data were compared with data from 3-T MRI with late enhancement, which served as the reference standard for scar detection using the American Heart Association's 17-segment model of the left ventricle. RESULTS One hundred one (17%) of 612 myocardial segments in 22 (61%) of 36 patients showed late enhancement on MRI. Although myocardial iodine mapping was prone to artifacts, mostly arising from sternal wires (70% sensitivity), 100-kV gray-scale images showed the highest sensitivity (80%) for the detection of myocardial scar. Blended virtual 120-kV images with lower noise and higher resolution had the best diagnostic accuracy (77% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 85% positive predictive value, 96% negative predictive value, and 94% accuracy). CONCLUSION Detection of chronic myocardial infarction on color-coded iodine distribution analysis with first-generation dual-energy CT is impeded by thoracic metallic devices. This group of patients benefits more from adequate blending of high- and low-kilovoltage gray-scale images. Further technical improvements are desirable to lower artifact burden and improve sensitivity on myocardial iodine distribution mapping.

[1]  L. Zatz.  The effect of the kVp level on EMI values. Selective imaging of various materials with different kVp settings. , 1976, Radiology.

[2]  L. Haramati,et al.  CT detection of acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results , 2005, European Radiology.

[4]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  A Feasibility Study of Contrast Enhancement of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Multislice Computed Tomography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Gross Morphology in Pigs , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Elmar Spuentrup,et al.  Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[7]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. , 2005 .

[8]  C. Caussin,et al.  Late defect on delayed contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT scans in the prediction of SPECT infarct size after reperfused acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  G. Raff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Henry R. Halperin,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Multidetector Computed Tomography Viability Imaging After Myocardial Infarction: Characterization of Myocyte Death, Microvascular Obstruction, and Chronic Scar , 2006, Circulation.

[11]  R. Cury,et al.  Differentiation of recent and chronic myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[13]  Roger B. Davis,et al.  Impact of Unrecognized Myocardial Scar Detected by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Event-Free Survival in Patients Presenting With Signs or Symptoms of Coronary Artery Disease , 2006, Circulation.

[14]  Bénédicte Belge,et al.  Characterization of Acute and Chronic Myocardial Infarcts by Multidetector Computed Tomography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance , 2006, Circulation.

[15]  Philipp Bruners,et al.  Late-phase MSCT in the different stages of myocardial infarction: animal experiments , 2007, European Radiology.

[16]  Thomas J. Brady,et al.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: Evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion—Is it possible? , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[17]  C. Claussen,et al.  Sixty-four-MSCT in the characterization of porcine acute and subacute myocardial infarction: determination of transmurality in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[18]  C. Herzog,et al.  Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. , 2007, Radiology.

[19]  Philipp Bruners,et al.  Low Tube Voltage Improves Computed Tomography Imaging of Delayed Myocardial Contrast Enhancement in an Experimental Acute Myocardial Infarction Model , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[20]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Mulugeta Gebregziabher,et al.  Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience , 2008, European Radiology.

[23]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[24]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Comparison of multislice computed tomography to gated single-photon emission computed tomography for imaging of healed myocardial infarcts. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Dual-energy CT of the heart--principles and protocols. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[26]  M. Scheuering,et al.  Perfusion weighted color maps for enhanced visualization of myocardial infarction by MSCT: preliminary experience , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[27]  R. Kwong,et al.  Incidence and Prognostic Implication of Unrecognized Myocardial Scar Characterized by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Patients Without Clinical Evidence of Myocardial Infarction , 2008, Circulation.

[28]  Y. Kim,et al.  Multidetector-row computed tomographic evaluation of myocardial perfusion in reperfused chronic myocardial infarction: value of color-coded perfusion map in a porcine model , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[29]  W. Bautz,et al.  Right heart: split-bolus injection of diluted contrast medium for visualization at coronary CT angiography. , 2008, Radiology.

[30]  D. Hough,et al.  Evaluation of non-linear blending in dual-energy computed tomography. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[31]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Image quality optimization and evaluation of linearly mixed images in dual-source, dual-energy CT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[32]  N. Kachenoura,et al.  Value of multidetector computed tomography evaluation of myocardial perfusion in the assessment of ischemic heart disease: comparison with nuclear perfusion imaging , 2009, European Radiology.

[33]  R. Kim,et al.  Unrecognized Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction: Prevalence and Prognostic Significance in Patients with Suspected Coronary Disease , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[34]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[35]  R. Rubinshtein,et al.  Detection of myocardial infarction by dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography using quantitated myocardial scintigraphy as the reference standard , 2009, Heart.