Bridging Distance and Culture With a Cyberspace Method of Qualitative Analysis

This article describes a qualitative research method that weds the cyberspace technology of e-mail with a phenomenological research approach. Examples are provided from 2 separate data sets. One data set explored the meaning of health for Japanese elders; the second explored Chinese nurses' experience of taking care of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lessons learned while using the cyberspace method are discussed, including guidance for organizing a long-distance research team, the central place of trust, and the time when e-mail communication demands to be supplemented with face-to-face interaction. The potential for bridging distance and culture with this cyberspace method is introduced for consideration and critique.

[1]  Paul Hemp The DHL EuroCup: shots on goal. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[2]  A. Cotton The Discursive Field of Web‐Based Health Research: Implications for Nursing Research in Cyberspace , 2003, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[3]  A. V. Kaam Existential Foundations of Psychology , 1967 .

[4]  J. Graham,et al.  The Chinese negotiation. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[5]  M. Ruffin On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.

[6]  Ook Lee,et al.  Cultural Differences in E-Mail Use of Virtual Teams: A Critical Social Theory Perspective , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  Faculty and Student Experiences With Web-based Discussion Groups in a Large Lecture Setting , 2003, Nurse educator.

[8]  S. Ludington-Hoe,et al.  A successful long-distance research collaboration. , 1996, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[9]  J. Murray-García,et al.  Cultural Humility Versus Cultural Competence: A Critical Distinction in Defining Physician Training Outcomes in Multicultural Education , 1998, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[10]  J. Norris One-to-One Teleapprenticeship as a Means for Nurses Teaching and Learning Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming , 2002, Nursing science quarterly.

[11]  G. M. Miyashiro,et al.  [The illness narratives: suffering, healing and the human condition]. , 1991, Cadernos de saude publica.

[12]  J. Mackie,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioural Science , 1965 .

[13]  Stuart Myerburg,et al.  Measurement Issues Related to Data Collection on the World Wide Web , 2003, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[14]  Lessons learned as a research assistant studying ambulatory blood pressure in elderly Japanese stroke patients. , 2003, Nursing & health sciences.

[15]  M. Sandelowski,et al.  Devices and Desires: Gender, Technology and American Nursing , 2002, Nursing History Review.

[16]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[17]  L. Degner,et al.  Feasibility of using a computer-assisted intervention to enhance the way women with breast cancer communicate with their physicians. , 2002, Cancer nursing.

[18]  S. Turkle Technology and human vulnerability. A conversation with MIT's Sherry Turkle. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[19]  W. Galston Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , 1996 .

[20]  John L. Locke The de-voicing of society : why we don't talk to each other anymore , 1998 .

[21]  Initiating a Dialogue on Universal Problems-Cultural Solutions: Response to Patricia R. Underwood , 2000 .

[22]  S. LaCoursiere Research Methodology for the Internet: External Validity (Generalizability) , 2003, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[23]  Expressing health experience through embodied language. , 2002, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[24]  I. Graham,et al.  Multidisciplinary Cross-National Studies: A Commentary on Issues of Collaboration, Methodology, Analysis, and Publication , 2003, Qualitative health research.

[25]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Trauma in Real Time: Talking and Avoiding Online Conversations About the Death of Princess Diana , 2002 .