Noncoherent block demodulation of MSK with inherent and enhanced encoding

It is shown that there is a close relation between known noncoherent minimum shift keying (MSK) demodulation structures, such as envelope and differential receivers, and schemes derived from the noncoherent maximum-likelihood block estimation (N-MLBE) principle. When the observation interval is increased, the performance of MSK with N-MLBE tends to that of binary coherently detected orthogonal binary frequency shift keying. A new demodulation strategy, reduced block noncoherent estimation (RBNE), is introduced and shown to improve the performance of noncoherent MSK, beyond that of coherently detected orthogonal FSK. When RBNE is used with MSK and the observation interval is increased, the performance approaches that of antipodal signaling. The key feature of all these structures is multisymbol noncoherent processing with exploitation of the MSK inherent coding properties induced by its phase continuity. The use of binary block codes for MSK with N-MLBE is considered. It is shown that simple binary block codes with low bandwidth expansion that exploit the inherent MSK memory can give significant gains. >

[1]  M. Simon,et al.  Differential Versus Limiter - Discriminator Detection of Narrow-Band FM , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[2]  Ghassan Kawas Kaleh,et al.  A differentially coherent receiver for minimum shift keying signal , 1989, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[3]  Harry Leib,et al.  The phase of a vector perturbed by Gaussian' noise and differentially coherent receivers , 1988, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Yoshiteru Morihiro,et al.  Differential Detection of MSK with Nonredundant Error Correction , 1979, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[5]  Harry Leib,et al.  Noncoherent block demodulation of PSK , 1990, 40th IEEE Conference on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Laurence B. Milstein,et al.  Coding and Modulation Techniques for Frequency-Hopped Spread-Spectrum Communications Over a Pulse-Burst Jammed Rayleigh Fading Channel , 1985, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[7]  Dariush Divsalar,et al.  Multiple-symbol differential detection of MPSK , 1990, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[8]  W. Osborne,et al.  Coherent and Noncoherent Detection of CPFSK , 1974, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[9]  C.-E.W. Sundberg,et al.  Performance evaluation of differential and discriminator detection of continuous phase modulation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  F. Adachi,et al.  Error-rate performance of digital FM with differential detection in land mobile radio channels , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[11]  Richard E. Blahut,et al.  Digital transmission of information , 1990 .

[12]  T. Aulin,et al.  Symbol Error Probability Behaviour for Continuous Phase Modulation with Partially Coherent Detection , 1986 .

[13]  Bixio Rimoldi,et al.  A decomposition approach to CPM , 1988, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[14]  Stephen G. Wilson,et al.  Multi-symbol detection of M-DPSK , 1989, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 1989, and Exhibition. 'Communications Technology for the 1990s and Beyond.

[15]  S. Pasupathy,et al.  Minimum shift keying: A spectrally efficient modulation , 1979, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  R. de Buda,et al.  Coherent Demodulation of Frequency-Shift Keying with Low Deviation Ratio , 1972, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[17]  J.H. Lodge,et al.  A comparison of data modulation techniques for land mobile satellite channels , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[18]  H. Suzuki Optimum Gaussian Filter for Differential Detection of MSK , 1981, IEEE Trans. Commun..