Research, part of a Special Feature on Local, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Biofuels Jatropha in Mexico: Environmental and Social Impacts of an Incipient Biofuel Program

Three case studies from Mexico are presented in which the impacts of the recent introduction of jatropha cultivation for biodiesel production are examined. In Chiapas and Michoacan, local social and environmental impacts were assessed using interviews with key informants and questionnaires directed at three groups of stakeholders: jatropha cultivators, farmers in the same areas who are not cultivating jatropha, and laborers on jatropha farms. Results show that the farmers are primarily motivated to participate by the subsidies offered in a government program in the first 2 years, rather than any proven economic benefit. Our farm budget study indicated that profits would be marginal for these farmers. However, no cases of land alienation were involved, and impacts on food security and deforestation are currently not significant. Employment opportunities for landless laborers have increased in areas where jatropha is now grown. The program is only in its third year currently, so these outcomes would need to be reexamined as it develops. In Yucatan, production is mainly in the hands of commercial companies, using estates formerly under low-intensity grazing and secondary forest. A carbon balance analysis indicated that there may be a significant loss of carbon stocks associated with jatropha plantation establishment on these estates. Depending on the maturity of the forest regrowth and the intensity of jatropha production, the carbon payback period varies from 2 to 14 years, although, in some scenarios, the carbon debt may never be recovered.

[1]  Sharachchandra Lele,et al.  Jatropha plantations for biodiesel in Tamil Nadu, India: Viability, livelihood trade-offs, and latent conflict , 2010 .

[2]  Wouter Achten,et al.  Jatropha: From global hype to local opportunity , 2010 .

[3]  Nidhi Tandon The bio-fuel frenzy: what options for rural women? A case of rural development schizophrenia , 2009 .

[4]  Laura German,et al.  The Local Social and Environmental Impacts of Smallholder-Based Biofuel Investments in Zambia , 2011 .

[5]  Deborah Lawrence,et al.  Loss of carbon sequestration potential after several decades of shifting cultivation in the Southern Yucatán. , 2009 .

[6]  A. A. A. Kheira,et al.  Response of Jatropha curcas L. to water deficits: Yield, water use efficiency and oilseed characteristics , 2009 .

[7]  K. Openshaw A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise☆ , 2000 .

[8]  John F. McCarthy,et al.  Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: oil palm and agrarian change in Sumatra, Indonesia , 2010, The Journal of peasant studies.

[9]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of bioenergy , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  P. W. Gerbens-Leenes,et al.  The water footprint of biofuels from microalgae , 2013 .

[11]  K. Becker,et al.  Biofuels from Jatropha curcas oil - perspectives for tropical regions. , 2009 .

[12]  Bart Muys,et al.  Towards domestication of Jatropha curcas , 2010 .

[13]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Energy analysis of Jatropha plantation systems for biodiesel production in Thailand , 2010 .

[14]  F. Nelson,et al.  Biofuel, land access and rural livelihoods in Tanzania , 2009 .

[15]  H. Tiessen,et al.  Soil organic C sequestration and stabilization in karstic soils of Yucatan , 2003 .

[16]  Giorgos Kallis,et al.  The political ecology of Jatropha plantations for biodiesel in Tamil Nadu, India , 2010 .