Lessons from global trends in climate change legislation and litigation

There is no country in the world that does not have at least one law or policy dealing with climate change. The most prolific countries have well over 20, and globally there are 1,800 such laws. Some of them are executive orders or policies issued by governments, others are legislative acts passed by parliament. The judiciary has been involved in 1,500 court cases that concern climate change (over 1,100 of which in the US). We use Climate Change Laws of the World (CCLW), a publicly accessible database, to analyze patterns and trends in climate change legislation and litigation over the past 30 years. The data reveal that global legislative activity peaked around 2008-13, well before the Paris Agreement. Accounting for government effectiveness and the length of time laws have been in effect, the UK and South Korea are the most comprehensive legislators among the G20 and Spain is within the OECD. Climate change legislation is less of a partisan issue than is commonly assumed: the number of climate laws passed by governments of the left, center and right is roughly proportional to their time in office. We also find that legislative activity decreases in times of economic difficulty. Where courts have got involved, judges outside the US have ruled in favor of enhanced climate protection in 53 percent of cases (US judges are more likely to rule against climate protection).

[1]  M. Collins,et al.  Do international factors influence the passage of climate change legislation? , 2016 .

[2]  Astghik Mavisakalyan,et al.  Gender and climate change: Do female parliamentarians make difference? , 2019, European Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  J. Peel Issues in Climate Change Litigation , 2012 .

[4]  J. Setzer,et al.  Global trends in climate change litigation: 2019 snapshot , 2019 .

[5]  M. Wilensky Climate Change in the Courts: An Assessment of Non-U.S. Climate Litigation , 2015 .

[6]  N. Höhne,et al.  National climate change mitigation legislation, strategy and targets: a global update , 2018, Climate Policy.

[7]  Robert L. Glicksman,et al.  Strategies in and outcomes of climate change litigation in the United States , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[8]  K. Bouwer The Unsexy Future of Climate Change Litigation , 2018, Journal of Environmental Law.

[9]  J. Peel,et al.  Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South , 2019, American Journal of International Law.

[10]  H. Osofsky Litigation's Role in the Path of U.S. Federal Climate Change Regulation: Implications of AEP v. Connecticut , 2012 .

[11]  Justin M. Gundlach,et al.  The Status of Climate Change Litigation: A Global Review , 2017 .

[12]  E. Scotford,et al.  Probing the hidden depths of climate law: Analysing national climate change legislation , 2018, Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law.

[13]  A. McCright,et al.  The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010 , 2011 .

[14]  B. Preston Climate Change Litigation (Part 1) , 2011 .

[15]  R. Steurer,et al.  Taking stock of Climate Change Acts in Europe: living policy processes or symbolic gestures? , 2019, Climate Policy.

[16]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Environmental Concern and the Business Cycle: The Chilling Effect of Recession , 2010 .

[17]  S. Fankhauser,et al.  The impact of strategic climate legislation: evidence from expert interviews on the UK Climate Change Act , 2020 .

[18]  E. Neumayer Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries , 2003 .

[19]  E. Prescott,et al.  Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation , 1997 .

[20]  J. Setzer,et al.  Regulating climate change in the courts , 2017 .

[21]  M. Collins,et al.  The political economy of passing climate change legislation: Evidence from a survey , 2015 .

[22]  J. Ruhl,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of Climate Change in the Courts: A New Jurisprudence or Business as Usual? , 2011 .

[23]  N. Höhne,et al.  Developments in national climate change mitigation legislation and strategy , 2013 .

[24]  J. Solana Climate Litigation in Financial Markets: A Typology , 2019, Transnational Environmental Law.

[25]  N. Stern,et al.  Environmental policy and the economic downturn , 2010 .

[26]  J. Peel,et al.  Climate Change Litigation: Regulatory Pathways to Cleaner Energy , 2015 .

[27]  J. Setzer,et al.  Climate Litigation in the Global South: Constraints and Innovations , 2019, Transnational Environmental Law.

[28]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States , 2011 .

[29]  J. Rogelj,et al.  Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C , 2016, Nature.

[30]  L. Hughes The Rocky Hill decision: a watershed for climate change action? , 2019, Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law.

[31]  Baran Doda Evidence on business cycles and CO2 emissions , 2014 .

[32]  N. Carter The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy , 2001 .

[33]  James Painter,et al.  Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007–10 , 2012 .

[34]  Daniel A. Kaufmann,et al.  The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues , 2010 .

[35]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  A Global Green New Deal: Rethinking the Economic Recovery , 2010 .