Measuring personal networks with daily contacts: a single-item survey question and the contact diary

Abstract This paper examines two extreme approaches that are alternatives to measure egocentric networks with network generators. The single-item approach to measure daily contacts differentiates the individuals effectively, corresponds closely with complex network measures, and reveals well how individuals vary in both expressive and instrumental returns, as supported by 14 large-scale probability surveys from three Chinese societies over a decade. This paper also draws upon three sets of sophisticated contact diaries, which yielded rich data about the circumstance of each contact, the alter's characteristics and the ego–alter relationship. Along with the diary approach, which offers sophisticated data about contacts, ties and networks, the single-item survey approach is another extreme yet straightforward measure of daily contacts.

[1]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[2]  M.P.J. van der Gaag.  Proposals for the measurement of individual social capital , 2003 .

[3]  B. Erickson.  Culture, Class, and Connections , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Alain Degenne.  Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[5]  D. Kahneman.  Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[6]  Christopher McCarty,et al.  Eliciting representative samples of personal networks , 1997 .

[7]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Estimating the size of personal networks , 1990 .

[8]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[9]  R. Alba,et al.  Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. , 1974 .

[10]  M. Kochen,et al.  Contacts and influence , 1978 .

[11]  Nan Lin,et al.  Access to occupations through social ties , 1986 .

[12]  T. Snijders,et al.  Prologue to the Measurement of Social Capital , 1999, The Tocqueville Review.

[13]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  A Procedure for Surveying Personal Networks , 1978 .

[14]  C. McCarty,et al.  COMPARING FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING PERSONAL SOCIAL NETWORKS , 1990 .

[15]  Markku Lonkila,et al.  Social Networks in Post-Soviet Russia. Continuity and Change in the Everyday Life of St. Petersburg Teachers , 1999 .

[16]  T. Snijders,et al.  Proposals for the measurement of individual social capital , 2003 .

[17]  N. Milburn.  To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. , 1983 .

[18]  B. Wellman.  The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network items and the general social survey , 1984 .

[20]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Interviewer effects in measuring network size using a single name generator , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[21]  K. Campbell,et al.  Name generators in surveys of personal networks , 1991 .

[22]  P. Killworth,et al.  The reversal small-world experiment , 1978 .

[23]  B. Erickson,et al.  The distribution of gendered social capital in Canada , 2004 .

[24]  Ralph Arnote,et al.  Hong Kong (China) , 1996, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project.