Well-being and performance at work: a new approach favourable to the optimal functioning of workers through virtuous organisational practice

Purpose The post-COVID-19 era is characterised in the professional field by a deterioration in the psychological health of employees and by “The Great Resignation”. These phenomena require managers to rethink both organisational and HR strategies to protect their workers’ health, to retain them in their job and, in fine, to ensure the sustainability of the organisation. However, studies have demonstrated that high performance work systems (HPWS), which are currently the dominant approach in human resource management, are related to an intensification of work and consequently a deterioration of employees’ health (conflicting outcomes perspective). At the same time, workers’ well-being has been shown to be associated with numerous organisational outcomes, such as individual performance. However, relatively few articles have investigated win–win organisational practices or programmes that promote the well-being and consequently performance of workers. These include virtuous organisational practices (VOPs), which specifically aim to enhance employees’ well-being, considered not as a means to an end, but as an end in itself (mutual gains perspective). This paper aims to develop the general hypothesis that VOPs could increase employees’ performance by protecting their health and thus offer an alternative to HPWS. Design/methodology/approach We review relevant current research on psychological well-being and work performance and present innovative systems of organisational practices such as VOPs that create psychologically healthy workplaces and enhance workers’ optimal functioning (well-being and performance). Findings Based on theoretical arguments and empirical studies, we hypothesise that alternative practices such as VOPs can increase employees’ performance while protecting their health and encouraging them to stay in the organisation. Research limitations/implications After this review, we discuss future avenues for research to encourage the scientific community to test this hypothesis. Practical implications Finally, we make a number of specific recommendations about how to (1) appraise, design and implement VOPs, (2) enhance organisational communication and managerial adherence to VOPs, and (3) train managers in R.I.G.H.T leadership behaviours. Originality/value Presentation of an original approach in this research field: the VOPs.

[1]  Fadi-Joseph Lahiani,et al.  A New Gain Spiral at Work: Relationships between Virtuous Organizational Practices, Psychological Capital, and Well-Being of Workers , 2023, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  H. Jeffrey,et al.  Post pandemic “revenge travel”: developing organizations to address staff shortage , 2022, Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal.

[3]  Fadi-Joseph Lahiani,et al.  Virtuous Organizational Practices: A New Construct and a New Inventory , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[4]  Meng Xi,et al.  Feeling anxious and abusing low performers: A multilevel model of high performance work system and abusive supervision , 2021, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[5]  E. Kelloway,et al.  R.I.G.H.T. leadership: Scale development and validation of a psychologically healthy leadership model , 2021, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration.

[6]  Sun Jiandong,et al.  Double-Edged Sword Effect of High-Performance Work System on Employee Well-Being—Moderating Effect of Union Practice , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[7]  Jamie A. Gruman,et al.  A balanced view of mindfulness at work , 2021, Organizational Psychology Review.

[8]  Saeed Pahlevan Sharif,et al.  The relationship between abusive supervision, psychological ownership, and quality of nursing care: The mediating role of job satisfaction. , 2021, Perspectives in psychiatric care.

[9]  A. Isham,et al.  Worker wellbeing and productivity in advanced economies: Re-examining the link , 2021 .

[10]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Do high-performance work systems harm employees’ health? An investigation of service-oriented HPWS in the Chinese healthcare sector , 2021, The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

[11]  Jae Hong Kim,et al.  Does employee satisfaction influence customer satisfaction? Assessing coffee shops through the service profit chain model , 2021 .

[12]  Malgorzata W. Kozusznik,et al.  Revisiting the Happy-Productive Worker Thesis from a Eudaimonic Perspective: A Systematic Review , 2021, Sustainability.

[13]  Allison S. Gabriel,et al.  Employee Physical Activity: A Multidisciplinary Integrative Review , 2021 .

[14]  M. Sharma,et al.  Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: A Meta-Analysis , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[15]  J. Polo,et al.  Meta-analysis and Scientific Mapping of Well-being and Job Performance , 2020, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[16]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Job satisfaction and firm performance: Can employees’ job satisfaction change the trajectory of a firm’s performance? , 2020 .

[17]  Panagiotis V. Kloutsiniotis,et al.  Is it worth it? Linking perceived high-performance work systems and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of job demands and job resources , 2020 .

[18]  Chris Fournier,et al.  What do Young Employees Dream of? Quality of Work, Career Aspirations and Desire for Mobility Among the Under 30s , 2020, Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics.

[19]  E. Pagán-Castaño,et al.  Wellbeing in work environments , 2020 .

[20]  J. Peiró,et al.  Editorial to special issue “Personality and individual differences and healthy organizations” , 2020, Personality and Individual Differences.

[21]  J. Alegre,et al.  The challenge of increasing employees' well‐being and performance: How human resource management practices and engaging leadership work together toward reaching this goal , 2020, Human Resource Management.

[22]  Honglei Wang,et al.  Do high performance work systems generate negative effects? How and when? , 2020 .

[23]  B. Kuvaas,et al.  Human resource management systems, employee well‐being, and firm performance from the mutual gains and critical perspectives: The well‐being paradox , 2020, Human Resource Management.

[24]  Roberto Luna-Arocas,et al.  Does Positive Wellbeing Predict Job Performance Three Months Later? , 2020 .

[25]  Osman M. Karatepe,et al.  Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes of work-life balance among hotel employees: The mediating role of psychological contract breach , 2020 .

[26]  J. Roldán,et al.  Job performance as a mediator between affective states and job satisfaction: A multigroup analysis based on gender in an academic environment , 2020 .

[27]  Francesco Sarracino,et al.  Happiness Matters: Productivity Gains from Subjective Well-Being , 2019, Journal of Happiness Studies.

[28]  Malgorzata W. Kozusznik,et al.  Happy-Productive Teams and Work Units: A Systematic Review of the ‘Happy-Productive Worker Thesis’ , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[29]  F. Jaotombo Le fonctionnement optimal psychologique : apports conceptuels et méthodologiques , 2019 .

[30]  Russell A. Matthews,et al.  A Psychometric Assessment of OCB: Clarifying the Distinction Between OCB and CWB and Developing a Revised OCB Measure , 2019, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[31]  H. Bruch,et al.  Mutual Gains? Health‐Related HRM, Collective Well‐Being and Organizational Performance , 2019, Journal of Management Studies.

[32]  A. Coutts,et al.  A shorter working week for everyone: How much paid work is needed for mental health and well-being? , 2019, Social science & medicine.

[33]  J. Stewart,et al.  The paradox of employee psychological well-being practices: an integrative literature review and new directions for research , 2019 .

[34]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Illuminating the ‘Face’ of Justice: A Meta‐Analytic Examination of Leadership and Organizational Justice , 2018, Journal of Management Studies.

[35]  K. Sanders,et al.  Performance‐based rewards and innovative behaviors , 2018 .

[36]  T. Lomas,et al.  Mindfulness-based interventions in the workplace: An inclusive systematic review and meta-analysis of their impact upon wellbeing , 2018, The Journal of Positive Psychology.

[37]  M. Salanova,et al.  Mindfulness Can Make You Happy-and-Productive: A Mindfulness Controlled Trial and Its Effects on Happiness, Work Engagement and Performance , 2018 .

[38]  S. Page,et al.  The dark side of high performance human resource practices in the visitor economy , 2018, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[39]  Julia Mundy,et al.  Attribution theories in Human Resource Management research: a review and research agenda , 2018 .

[40]  Annamaria Di Fabio Positive Healthy Organizations: Promoting Well-Being, Meaningfulness, and Sustainability in Organizations , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[41]  P. Jiménez,et al.  Creating a healthy working environment with leadership: the concept of health-promoting leadership , 2017 .

[42]  Lamar Pierce,et al.  Doing Well by Making Well: The Impact of Corporate Wellness Programs on Employee Productivity , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[43]  E. Demerouti,et al.  Decision-Making Processes in the Workplace: How Exhaustion, Lack of Resources and Job Demands Impair Them and Affect Performance , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[44]  F. Luthans,et al.  Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach , 2017 .

[45]  A. Burton,et al.  How Effective are Mindfulness‐Based Interventions for Reducing Stress Among Healthcare Professionals? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2017, Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress.

[46]  J. James,et al.  Manager attitudes concerning flexible work arrangements: fixed or changeable? , 2017 .

[47]  Victor V. Claar,et al.  Are Servant Leaders Born or Made? , 2016 .

[48]  Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben,et al.  Getting to the “COR” , 2014 .

[49]  Katherine E. Masyn,et al.  Latent Class Analysis and Finite Mixture Modeling , 2013 .

[50]  Jaap Paauwe,et al.  Employee Well‐Being and the HRM - Organizational Performance Relationship: A Review of Quantitative Studies , 2012 .

[51]  A. J. van der Beek,et al.  Development of an individual work performance questionnaire , 2012 .

[52]  P. Warr How to Think About and Measure Psychological Well-Being , 2012 .

[53]  S. J. Motowidlo,et al.  5 Job Performance , 2012 .

[54]  J. Peiró,et al.  Occupational Safety and Health , 2012 .

[55]  Christine L. Porath,et al.  Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement , 2012 .

[56]  Mitchell J. Neubert,et al.  Introduction: The Value of Virtue to Management and Organizational Theory and Practice , 2011 .

[57]  Allard J van der Beek,et al.  Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: A Systematic Review , 2011, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[58]  Gulumser Kublay,et al.  Transformational leadership training programme for charge nurses. , 2011, Journal of advanced nursing.

[59]  S. Hobfoll Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings , 2011 .

[60]  David P. Lepak,et al.  EMPLOYEE ATTRIBUTIONS OF THE “WHY” OF HR PRACTICES: THEIR EFFECTS ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS, AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION , 2008 .

[61]  Debra L. Nelson,et al.  Advances in Occupational Health: From a Stressful Beginning to a Positive Future † , 2007 .

[62]  A. Bakker,et al.  The job demands-resources model : state of the art , 2007 .

[63]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[64]  Kim S. Cameron,et al.  Exploring the Relationships between Organizational Virtuousness and Performance , 2004 .

[65]  C. Keyes,et al.  The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. , 2002, Journal of health and social behavior.

[66]  S. Lyubomirsky,et al.  Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[67]  E. Deci,et al.  On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[68]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Subjective Weil-Being: Three Decades of Progress , 2004 .

[69]  S. Hobfoll Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[70]  Goitom Tesfom,et al.  The “Great Resignation”: Causes, Consequences, and Creative HR Management Strategies , 2022, Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies.

[71]  F. Cooke,et al.  Well-being-oriented human resource management practices and employee performance in the Chinese banking sector: the role of social climate and resilience , 2019 .

[72]  D. Guest Human resource management and employee well-being: towards a new analytic framework , 2017 .

[73]  B. Singer,et al.  Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being , 2008 .

[74]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Positive psychology. An introduction. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[75]  T. Meijman Psychological Aspects of Workload , 1998 .

[76]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .